Pesticide and Greenhouse Gas Externalities from US Agriculture: The Impact of their Internalization and Climate Change
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Climate Change Economics, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1350008 , 01.08.2013.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Pesticide and Greenhouse Gas Externalities from US Agriculture
T2 - The Impact of their Internalization and Climate Change
AU - Shakhramanyan, Dr. Nikolinka G.
AU - Schneider, Uwe A.
AU - McCarl, Bruce A.
PY - 2013/8/1
Y1 - 2013/8/1
N2 - Climate change may affect the use of pesticides and their associated environmental and human health impacts. This study employs and modifies a partial equilibrium model of the US agricultural sector to examine the effects of alternative regulations of the pesticide and greenhouse gas emission externality. Simulation results indicate that without pesticide externality regulations and low greenhouse gas emission mitigation strategy, climate change benefits from increased agricultural production in the US are more than offset by increased environmental costs. Although the combined regulation of pesticide and greenhouse gas emission externalities increases farmers' production costs, their net income effects are positive because of price adjustments and associated welfare shifts from consumers to producers. The results also show heterogeneous impacts on preferred pest management intensities across major crops. While pesticide externality regulations lead to substantial increases in total water use, climate policies induce the opposite effect.
AB - Climate change may affect the use of pesticides and their associated environmental and human health impacts. This study employs and modifies a partial equilibrium model of the US agricultural sector to examine the effects of alternative regulations of the pesticide and greenhouse gas emission externality. Simulation results indicate that without pesticide externality regulations and low greenhouse gas emission mitigation strategy, climate change benefits from increased agricultural production in the US are more than offset by increased environmental costs. Although the combined regulation of pesticide and greenhouse gas emission externalities increases farmers' production costs, their net income effects are positive because of price adjustments and associated welfare shifts from consumers to producers. The results also show heterogeneous impacts on preferred pest management intensities across major crops. While pesticide externality regulations lead to substantial increases in total water use, climate policies induce the opposite effect.
KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics
KW - Climate change impacts
KW - pesticide externality
KW - farm management adaptation
KW - agricultural sector model
KW - welfare maximization
KW - environmental policy analysis
KW - water resource
KW - mathematical programming
KW - Climate change impacts; pesticide externality; farm management adaptation; agricultural sector model; welfare maximization; environmental policy analysis; water resource; mathematical programming
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015488440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1142/S2010007813500085
DO - 10.1142/S2010007813500085
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 4
JO - Climate Change Economics
JF - Climate Change Economics
SN - 2010-0078
IS - 3
M1 - 1350008
ER -