Performance of the Chemcatcher ® passive sampler when used to monitor 10 polar and semi-polar pesticides in 16 Central European streams, and comparison with two other sampling methods

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Performance of the Chemcatcher ® passive sampler when used to monitor 10 polar and semi-polar pesticides in 16 Central European streams, and comparison with two other sampling methods. / Paschke, Albrecht; Vrana, Branislav; Mueller, Ralf et al.
In: Water Research, Vol. 42, No. 10-11, 01.05.2008, p. 2707-2717.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{3b2ab134e8ea4b7aa02d7dbb3a2bab65,
title = "Performance of the Chemcatcher {\textregistered} passive sampler when used to monitor 10 polar and semi-polar pesticides in 16 Central European streams, and comparison with two other sampling methods",
abstract = "We investigated the performance of the Chemcatcher {\textregistered}, an aquatic passive sampling device consisting of a sampler body and an Empore {\textregistered} disk as receiving phase, when used to monitor acetochlor, alachlor, carbofuran, chlorfenvinphos, α-endosulfan, fenpropidin, linuron, oxadiazon, pirimicarb and tebuconazole in 16 Central European streams. The Chemcatcher {\textregistered}, equipped with an SDB-XC Empore {\textregistered} disk, detected seven of the aforementioned pesticides with a total of 54 detections. The time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations reached up to 1 μg/L for acetochlor and alachlor. Toxic units derived from these concentrations explained reasonably well the observed ecological effects of pesticide stress, measured with the SPEAR index. In a follow-up analysis, we compared the Chemcatcher {\textregistered} performance with those of two other sampling systems. The results obtained with the Chemcatcher {\textregistered} closely matched those of the event-driven water sampler. By contrast, the TWA concentrations were not significantly correlated with concentrations on suspended particles. We conclude that the Chemcatcher {\textregistered} is suitable for the monitoring of polar organic toxicants and presents an alternative to conventional spot sampling in the monitoring of episodically occurring pollutants.",
keywords = "Chemistry, Chemcatcher, Monitoring, Passive sampling, Pesticides, Pollution",
author = "Albrecht Paschke and Branislav Vrana and Ralf Mueller and Matthias Liess and Sch{\"a}fer, {Ralf B.}",
year = "2008",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.watres.2008.01.023",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "2707--2717",
journal = "Water Research",
issn = "0043-1354",
publisher = "IWA Publishing",
number = "10-11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance of the Chemcatcher ® passive sampler when used to monitor 10 polar and semi-polar pesticides in 16 Central European streams, and comparison with two other sampling methods

AU - Paschke, Albrecht

AU - Vrana, Branislav

AU - Mueller, Ralf

AU - Liess, Matthias

AU - Schäfer, Ralf B.

PY - 2008/5/1

Y1 - 2008/5/1

N2 - We investigated the performance of the Chemcatcher ®, an aquatic passive sampling device consisting of a sampler body and an Empore ® disk as receiving phase, when used to monitor acetochlor, alachlor, carbofuran, chlorfenvinphos, α-endosulfan, fenpropidin, linuron, oxadiazon, pirimicarb and tebuconazole in 16 Central European streams. The Chemcatcher ®, equipped with an SDB-XC Empore ® disk, detected seven of the aforementioned pesticides with a total of 54 detections. The time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations reached up to 1 μg/L for acetochlor and alachlor. Toxic units derived from these concentrations explained reasonably well the observed ecological effects of pesticide stress, measured with the SPEAR index. In a follow-up analysis, we compared the Chemcatcher ® performance with those of two other sampling systems. The results obtained with the Chemcatcher ® closely matched those of the event-driven water sampler. By contrast, the TWA concentrations were not significantly correlated with concentrations on suspended particles. We conclude that the Chemcatcher ® is suitable for the monitoring of polar organic toxicants and presents an alternative to conventional spot sampling in the monitoring of episodically occurring pollutants.

AB - We investigated the performance of the Chemcatcher ®, an aquatic passive sampling device consisting of a sampler body and an Empore ® disk as receiving phase, when used to monitor acetochlor, alachlor, carbofuran, chlorfenvinphos, α-endosulfan, fenpropidin, linuron, oxadiazon, pirimicarb and tebuconazole in 16 Central European streams. The Chemcatcher ®, equipped with an SDB-XC Empore ® disk, detected seven of the aforementioned pesticides with a total of 54 detections. The time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations reached up to 1 μg/L for acetochlor and alachlor. Toxic units derived from these concentrations explained reasonably well the observed ecological effects of pesticide stress, measured with the SPEAR index. In a follow-up analysis, we compared the Chemcatcher ® performance with those of two other sampling systems. The results obtained with the Chemcatcher ® closely matched those of the event-driven water sampler. By contrast, the TWA concentrations were not significantly correlated with concentrations on suspended particles. We conclude that the Chemcatcher ® is suitable for the monitoring of polar organic toxicants and presents an alternative to conventional spot sampling in the monitoring of episodically occurring pollutants.

KW - Chemistry

KW - Chemcatcher

KW - Monitoring

KW - Passive sampling

KW - Pesticides

KW - Pollution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43049122044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.watres.2008.01.023

DO - 10.1016/j.watres.2008.01.023

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 18313096

VL - 42

SP - 2707

EP - 2717

JO - Water Research

JF - Water Research

SN - 0043-1354

IS - 10-11

ER -