Oscar Chinn case
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research
Standard
Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. ed. / Rudiger Wolfrum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Oscar Chinn case
AU - Tams, Christian J.
PY - 2007/1
Y1 - 2007/1
N2 - The Oscar Chinn Case (United Kingdom v Belgium) is a seemingly petty case that raised fundamental legal issues and gave rise to deep divisions among the judges called upon to decide it. The majority judgment of 12 December 1934 remains important as a pronouncement, by the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ), on the legality of regulatory interference in trade protected by international treaties. In addition, a brief statement by Judge Schücking has come to be seen as a precursor to modern debates about the ius cogens concept.2 In early 1929,
AB - The Oscar Chinn Case (United Kingdom v Belgium) is a seemingly petty case that raised fundamental legal issues and gave rise to deep divisions among the judges called upon to decide it. The majority judgment of 12 December 1934 remains important as a pronouncement, by the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ), on the legality of regulatory interference in trade protected by international treaties. In addition, a brief statement by Judge Schücking has come to be seen as a precursor to modern debates about the ius cogens concept.2 In early 1929,
KW - Law
UR - https://www.mpfpr.de/publications/mpepil/
M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies
SN - 978-0199689651
SN - 0199689652
BT - Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law
A2 - Wolfrum, Rudiger
PB - Oxford University Press
CY - Oxford
ER -