On cosmotechnics: For a renewed relaton between technology and nature in the anthropocene
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 2-3, 2017, p. 319-341.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - On cosmotechnics
T2 - For a renewed relaton between technology and nature in the anthropocene
AU - Hui, Yuk
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - This article aims to bring forward a critical reflection on a renewed relation between nature and technology in the Anthropocene, by contextualizing the question around the recent debates on the "ontological turn" in Anthropology, which attempts to go beyond the nature and culture dualism analysed as the crisis of modernity. The "politics of ontologies" associated with this movement in anthropology opens up the question of participation of non-humans. This article contrasts this anthropological attempt with the work of the philosopher Gilbert Simondon, who wants to overcome the antagonism between culture and technics. According to Simondon, this antagonism results from the technological rupture of modernity at the end of the eighteenth century. This paper analyses the differences of the oppositions presenting their work: culture vs. nature, culture vs. technics, to show that a dialogue between anthropology of nature (illustrated through the work of Philippe Descola) and philosophy of technology (illustrated through the work of Simondon) will be fruitful to conceptualize a renewed relation between nature and technology. One way to initiate such a conversation as well as to think about the reconciliation between nature and technology, this article tries to show, is to develop the concept of cosmotechnics as the denominator of these two trends of thinking.
AB - This article aims to bring forward a critical reflection on a renewed relation between nature and technology in the Anthropocene, by contextualizing the question around the recent debates on the "ontological turn" in Anthropology, which attempts to go beyond the nature and culture dualism analysed as the crisis of modernity. The "politics of ontologies" associated with this movement in anthropology opens up the question of participation of non-humans. This article contrasts this anthropological attempt with the work of the philosopher Gilbert Simondon, who wants to overcome the antagonism between culture and technics. According to Simondon, this antagonism results from the technological rupture of modernity at the end of the eighteenth century. This paper analyses the differences of the oppositions presenting their work: culture vs. nature, culture vs. technics, to show that a dialogue between anthropology of nature (illustrated through the work of Philippe Descola) and philosophy of technology (illustrated through the work of Simondon) will be fruitful to conceptualize a renewed relation between nature and technology. One way to initiate such a conversation as well as to think about the reconciliation between nature and technology, this article tries to show, is to develop the concept of cosmotechnics as the denominator of these two trends of thinking.
KW - Cosmotechnics
KW - Gilbert simondon
KW - Modernity
KW - Ontological turn
KW - Philippe descola
KW - Philosophy
KW - Cultural studies
KW - Digital media
KW - Cultural Informatics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049095056&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5840/techne201711876
DO - 10.5840/techne201711876
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85049095056
VL - 21
SP - 319
EP - 341
JO - Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology
JF - Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology
SN - 1091-8264
IS - 2-3
ER -