Migrant struggles and moral economies of subversion: mimicry and opacity

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Migrant struggles and moral economies of subversion: mimicry and opacity. / Scheel, Stephan.
In: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 51, No. 10, 05.2025, p. 2648-2667.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{660a8a8a059c4ff4a96921ee8fb5e66c,
title = "Migrant struggles and moral economies of subversion: mimicry and opacity",
abstract = "Border regimes are pervaded by moral economies that justify practices of regulation and control. This article attends to the moral economies that animate migrants{\textquoteright} struggles and related practices of subversion. Based on a reading of moral economies close to E.P Thompson{\textquoteright}s original formulation of the concept, it investigates the norms and beliefs that are carried by migrants{\textquoteright} practices of appropriation. By showing that these practices are, from migrants{\textquoteright} viewpoint, just and legitimate insofar as they defend or restore traditional rights, customs and entitlements, the analysis destabilizes dominant framings of migrants as cunning tricksters. Moreover, the analysis of the moral economies of migrants{\textquoteright} border struggles allows to distinguish between two different logics of appropriation. To this end, I mobilize two figures of thought from postcolonial theory. First, Homi Bhabha{\textquoteright}s notion of mimicry captures the logic of practices that repurpose mechanisms of control in ways that allow migrants to obtain a visa, asylum, or a residency title (subversion through documentation). Second, Eduard Glissant{\textquoteright}s work on opacity enables us in turn to theorize practices of appropriation that rely on the creation of ambiguity and multiplicity to counteract authorities{\textquoteright} attempts to assign migrants a unique stable identity by means of biometrics (subversion of documentation).",
keywords = "Autonomy of migration, biometrics, colonialism, identification, resistance, Sociology",
author = "Stephan Scheel",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2025",
month = may,
doi = "10.1080/1369183X.2025.2461355",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "2648--2667",
journal = "Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies",
issn = "1369-183X",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Migrant struggles and moral economies of subversion

T2 - mimicry and opacity

AU - Scheel, Stephan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2025/5

Y1 - 2025/5

N2 - Border regimes are pervaded by moral economies that justify practices of regulation and control. This article attends to the moral economies that animate migrants’ struggles and related practices of subversion. Based on a reading of moral economies close to E.P Thompson’s original formulation of the concept, it investigates the norms and beliefs that are carried by migrants’ practices of appropriation. By showing that these practices are, from migrants’ viewpoint, just and legitimate insofar as they defend or restore traditional rights, customs and entitlements, the analysis destabilizes dominant framings of migrants as cunning tricksters. Moreover, the analysis of the moral economies of migrants’ border struggles allows to distinguish between two different logics of appropriation. To this end, I mobilize two figures of thought from postcolonial theory. First, Homi Bhabha’s notion of mimicry captures the logic of practices that repurpose mechanisms of control in ways that allow migrants to obtain a visa, asylum, or a residency title (subversion through documentation). Second, Eduard Glissant’s work on opacity enables us in turn to theorize practices of appropriation that rely on the creation of ambiguity and multiplicity to counteract authorities’ attempts to assign migrants a unique stable identity by means of biometrics (subversion of documentation).

AB - Border regimes are pervaded by moral economies that justify practices of regulation and control. This article attends to the moral economies that animate migrants’ struggles and related practices of subversion. Based on a reading of moral economies close to E.P Thompson’s original formulation of the concept, it investigates the norms and beliefs that are carried by migrants’ practices of appropriation. By showing that these practices are, from migrants’ viewpoint, just and legitimate insofar as they defend or restore traditional rights, customs and entitlements, the analysis destabilizes dominant framings of migrants as cunning tricksters. Moreover, the analysis of the moral economies of migrants’ border struggles allows to distinguish between two different logics of appropriation. To this end, I mobilize two figures of thought from postcolonial theory. First, Homi Bhabha’s notion of mimicry captures the logic of practices that repurpose mechanisms of control in ways that allow migrants to obtain a visa, asylum, or a residency title (subversion through documentation). Second, Eduard Glissant’s work on opacity enables us in turn to theorize practices of appropriation that rely on the creation of ambiguity and multiplicity to counteract authorities’ attempts to assign migrants a unique stable identity by means of biometrics (subversion of documentation).

KW - Autonomy of migration

KW - biometrics

KW - colonialism

KW - identification

KW - resistance

KW - Sociology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=86000448093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1369183X.2025.2461355

DO - 10.1080/1369183X.2025.2461355

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:86000448093

VL - 51

SP - 2648

EP - 2667

JO - Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

JF - Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

SN - 1369-183X

IS - 10

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Act it out! Drama teaching methods
  2. Collaboration for a more sustainable agriculture – when does it work?
  3. Seeing polycentrically
  4. A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation
  5. Digital technology and global mobility
  6. Forestry contributed to warming of forest ecosystems in northern Germany during the extreme summers of 2018 and 2019
  7. Towards gender equality in the Ukrainian society
  8. Does Training Improve the Business Performance of Small-Scale Entrepreneurs?
  9. Portfolio
  10. Musikbegriff, erweiterter
  11. Vom Wert des Wertbegriffs
  12. TRADITION OF EDUCATION AND INTROSPECTION OF THE MODERN ERA
  13. Autochthone Mehrsprachigkeiten
  14. Defining value in sustainable business models
  15. Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy
  16. A Soft Piezo Mechanical Hydraulic Actuator with its Liquid Stiffness Identification and its Control
  17. Effective Strategies for Research Integrity Training—a Meta-analysis
  18. Internetgestützte Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung
  19. OpenCitations Meta
  20. Adventures of Anti-Dialectic
  21. Hot tearing susceptibility of binary Mg-Y alloy castings
  22. Regulierung des Irregulären
  23. Alles der Reihe nach!
  24. Die documenta – ein Konflikt-Feld
  25. Path dependence and the stabilization of strategic premises
  26. Corrigendum to: Pathways to Implementation: Evidence on How Participation in Environmental Governance Impacts on Environmental Outcomes
  27. Atkinson, Anthony B. Inequality. What Can Be Done? Cambridge/Massachusetts. Harvard University Press 2015
  28. Article 75 CISG
  29. Entrepreneurial remixing
  30. Ins Netz und hin zu gesellschaftlich gewünschten Medien