Measuring Effective Democracy: A Defense

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Standard

Measuring Effective Democracy : A Defense. / Alexander, Amy Catherine; Inglehart, Ronald; Welzel, Christian.

World Values Survey Association, 2011. p. 1-40 (World Values Research; Vol. 4, No. 1).

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Harvard

Alexander, AC, Inglehart, R & Welzel, C 2011 'Measuring Effective Democracy: A Defense' World Values Research, no. 1, vol. 4, World Values Survey Association, pp. 1-40. <http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSPublicationsPapers.jsp>

APA

Alexander, A. C., Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2011). Measuring Effective Democracy: A Defense. (pp. 1-40). (World Values Research; Vol. 4, No. 1). World Values Survey Association. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSPublicationsPapers.jsp

Vancouver

Alexander AC, Inglehart R, Welzel C. Measuring Effective Democracy: A Defense. World Values Survey Association. 2011, p. 1-40. (World Values Research; 1).

Bibtex

@techreport{2248420165c7456ca2473b5f92f5ba13,
title = "Measuring Effective Democracy: A Defense",
abstract = "Against recent criticism, this article demonstrates that the Index of Effective Democracy (EDI) has scale properties that are fully consistent with the normative premises of the indexes construction logic. Empirically, it is shown that the EDI deviates from all other indices of democracy in a perfectly intended way that incorporates substantiating qualities of democracy which the other indices neglect. As a result, the EDI outperforms all other democracy indices in its associative strength with key theoretical correlates of democracy, conditional and consequential. From a substantive point of view, the EDI is the most reliable and valid index of democracy that is currently available.",
keywords = "Politics, Gender and Diversity",
author = "Alexander, {Amy Catherine} and Ronald Inglehart and Christian Welzel",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
series = "World Values Research",
publisher = "World Values Survey Association",
number = "1",
pages = "1--40",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "World Values Survey Association",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Measuring Effective Democracy

T2 - A Defense

AU - Alexander, Amy Catherine

AU - Inglehart, Ronald

AU - Welzel, Christian

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Against recent criticism, this article demonstrates that the Index of Effective Democracy (EDI) has scale properties that are fully consistent with the normative premises of the indexes construction logic. Empirically, it is shown that the EDI deviates from all other indices of democracy in a perfectly intended way that incorporates substantiating qualities of democracy which the other indices neglect. As a result, the EDI outperforms all other democracy indices in its associative strength with key theoretical correlates of democracy, conditional and consequential. From a substantive point of view, the EDI is the most reliable and valid index of democracy that is currently available.

AB - Against recent criticism, this article demonstrates that the Index of Effective Democracy (EDI) has scale properties that are fully consistent with the normative premises of the indexes construction logic. Empirically, it is shown that the EDI deviates from all other indices of democracy in a perfectly intended way that incorporates substantiating qualities of democracy which the other indices neglect. As a result, the EDI outperforms all other democracy indices in its associative strength with key theoretical correlates of democracy, conditional and consequential. From a substantive point of view, the EDI is the most reliable and valid index of democracy that is currently available.

KW - Politics

KW - Gender and Diversity

M3 - Working papers

T3 - World Values Research

SP - 1

EP - 40

BT - Measuring Effective Democracy

PB - World Values Survey Association

ER -

Documents

Links