1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publications
  5. Manipulating Belief in Free Will and Its...
  6. Output formats
  7. //

Manipulating Belief in Free Will and Its Downstream Consequences: A Meta-Analysis

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Standard

Manipulating Belief in Free Will and Its Downstream Consequences: A Meta-Analysis. / Genschow, Oliver; Cracco, Emiel; Schneider, Jana et al.
In: Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, 02.2023, p. 52-82.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Genschow, O, Cracco, E, Schneider, J, Protzko, J, Wisniewski, D, Brass, M & Schooler, JW 2023, 'Manipulating Belief in Free Will and Its Downstream Consequences: A Meta-Analysis', Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 52-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221087527

APA

Genschow, O., Cracco, E., Schneider, J., Protzko, J., Wisniewski, D., Brass, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2023). Manipulating Belief in Free Will and Its Downstream Consequences: A Meta-Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(1), 52-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221087527

Vancouver

Genschow O, Cracco E, Schneider J, Protzko J, Wisniewski D, Brass M et al. Manipulating Belief in Free Will and Its Downstream Consequences: A Meta-Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2023 Feb;27(1):52-82. doi: 10.1177/10888683221087527

Bibtex

@article{395986d725584ff5b0749832e803ca1c,
title = "Manipulating Belief in Free Will and Its Downstream Consequences: A Meta-Analysis",
abstract = "Ever since some scientists and popular media put forward the idea that free will is an illusion, the question has risen what would happen if people stopped believing in free will. Psychological research has investigated this question by testing the consequences of experimentally weakening people{\textquoteright}s free will beliefs. The results of these investigations have been mixed, with successful experiments and unsuccessful replications. This raises two fundamental questions: Can free will beliefs be manipulated, and do such manipulations have downstream consequences? In a meta-analysis including 145 experiments (95 unpublished), we show that exposing individuals to anti–free will manipulations decreases belief in free will and increases belief in determinism. However, we could not find evidence for downstream consequences. Our findings have important theoretical implications for research on free will beliefs and contribute to the discussion of whether reducing people{\textquoteright}s belief in free will has societal consequences.",
keywords = "belief, cheating, determinism, free will, meta-analysis, morality, punishment, social behavior, Business psychology",
author = "Oliver Genschow and Emiel Cracco and Jana Schneider and John Protzko and David Wisniewski and Marcel Brass and Schooler, {Jonathan W.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.",
year = "2023",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1177/10888683221087527",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "52--82",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Review",
issn = "1088-8683",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Manipulating Belief in Free Will and Its Downstream Consequences

T2 - A Meta-Analysis

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Cracco, Emiel

AU - Schneider, Jana

AU - Protzko, John

AU - Wisniewski, David

AU - Brass, Marcel

AU - Schooler, Jonathan W.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

PY - 2023/2

Y1 - 2023/2

N2 - Ever since some scientists and popular media put forward the idea that free will is an illusion, the question has risen what would happen if people stopped believing in free will. Psychological research has investigated this question by testing the consequences of experimentally weakening people’s free will beliefs. The results of these investigations have been mixed, with successful experiments and unsuccessful replications. This raises two fundamental questions: Can free will beliefs be manipulated, and do such manipulations have downstream consequences? In a meta-analysis including 145 experiments (95 unpublished), we show that exposing individuals to anti–free will manipulations decreases belief in free will and increases belief in determinism. However, we could not find evidence for downstream consequences. Our findings have important theoretical implications for research on free will beliefs and contribute to the discussion of whether reducing people’s belief in free will has societal consequences.

AB - Ever since some scientists and popular media put forward the idea that free will is an illusion, the question has risen what would happen if people stopped believing in free will. Psychological research has investigated this question by testing the consequences of experimentally weakening people’s free will beliefs. The results of these investigations have been mixed, with successful experiments and unsuccessful replications. This raises two fundamental questions: Can free will beliefs be manipulated, and do such manipulations have downstream consequences? In a meta-analysis including 145 experiments (95 unpublished), we show that exposing individuals to anti–free will manipulations decreases belief in free will and increases belief in determinism. However, we could not find evidence for downstream consequences. Our findings have important theoretical implications for research on free will beliefs and contribute to the discussion of whether reducing people’s belief in free will has societal consequences.

KW - belief

KW - cheating

KW - determinism

KW - free will

KW - meta-analysis

KW - morality

KW - punishment

KW - social behavior

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131726561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f41b093b-d49e-3539-8fca-12ba4dec1917/

U2 - 10.1177/10888683221087527

DO - 10.1177/10888683221087527

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 35676864

AN - SCOPUS:85131726561

VL - 27

SP - 52

EP - 82

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Review

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Review

SN - 1088-8683

IS - 1

ER -

Related by journal

Do salient social norms moderate mortality salience effects? A (challenging) meta-analysis of terror management studies

Schindler, S., Hilgard, J., Fritsche, I., Burke, B. & Pfattheicher, S., 05.2023, In: Personality and Social Psychology Review. 27, 2, p. 195-225 31 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups

Radke, H. R. M., Kutlaca, M., Siem, B., Wright, S. C. & Becker, J. C., 01.11.2020, In: Personality and Social Psychology Review. 24, 4, p. 291-315 25 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Is Ego Depletion Real? An Analysis of Arguments

Friese, M., Loschelder, D. D., Gieseler, K., Frankenbach, J. & Inzlicht, M., 01.05.2019, In: Personality and Social Psychology Review. 23, 2, p. 107-131 25 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Other publications by the same author(s)

Automatic Imitation

Genschow, O. & Cracco, E., 2025, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Research output: Books and anthologies › Book

Introduction to Automatic Imitation

Genschow, O. & Cracco, E., 2025, Automatic Imitation. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, p. 1-7

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review

Social Modulation of Imitative Behavior

Genschow, O. & Cracco, E., 2025, Automatic Imitation. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, p. 219–239

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review

Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Vlasceanu, M., Doell, K. C., Bak-Coleman, J. B., Todorova, B., Berkebile-Weinberg, M. M., Grayson, S. J., Patel, Y., Goldwert, D., Pei, Y., Chakroff, A., Pronizius, E., Broek, K. L. V. D., Vlasceanu, D., Constantino, S., Morais, M. J., Schumann, P., Rathje, S., Fang, K., Aglioti, S. M., Alfano, M., Alvarado-Yepez, A. J., Andersen, A., Anseel, F., Apps, M. A. J., Asadli, C., Awuor, F. J., Azevedo, F., Basaglia, P., Bélanger, J. J., Berger, S., Bertin, P., Białek, M., Bialobrzeska, O., Blaya-Burgo, M., Bleize, D. N. M., Bø, S., Boecker, L., Boggio, P. S., Borau, S., Bos, B., Bouguettaya, A., Brauer, M., Brick, C., Brik, T., Briker, R., Brosch, T., Buchel, O., Buonauro, D., Butalia, R., Carvacho, H., Chamberlain, S. A. E., Chan, H-Y., Chow, D., Chung, D., Cian, L., Cohen-Eick, N., Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Contu, D., Cristea, V., Cutler, J., D'Ottone, S., Keersmaecker, J. D., Delcourt, S., Delouvée, S., Diel, K., Douglas, B. D., Drupp, M. A., Dubey, S., Ekmanis, J., Elbaek, C. T., Elsherif, M., Engelhard, I. M., Escher, Y. A., Etienne, T. W., Farage, L., Farias, A. R., Feuerriegel, S., Findor, A., Freira, L., Friese, M., Gains, N. P., Gallyamova, A., Geiger, S. J., Genschow, O., Gjoneska, B., Gkinopoulos, T., Goldberg, B., Goldenberg, A., Gradidge, S., Grassini, S., Gray, K., Grelle, S., Griffin, S. M., Grigoryan, L., Grigoryan, A., Grigoryev, D., Gruber, J., Guilaran, J., Hadar, B., Hahnel, U. J. J., Halperin, E., Harvey, A. J., Haugestad, C. A. P., Herman, A. M., Hershfield, H. E., Himichi, T., Hine, D. W., Hofmann, W., Howe, L., Huaman-Chulluncuy, E. T., Huang, G., Ishii, T., Ito, A., Jia, F., Jost, J. T., Jovanović, V., Jurgiel, D., Kácha, O., Kankaanpää, R., Kantorowicz, J., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Mintz, K. K., Kaya, I., Kaya, O., Khachatryan, N., Klas, A., Klein, C., Klöckner, C. A., Koppel, L., Kosachenko, A. I., Kothe, E. J., Krebs, R., Krosch, A. R., Krouwel, A. P. M., Kyrychenko, Y., Lagomarsino, M., Lamm, C., Lange, F., Cunningham, J. L., Lees, J., Leung, T. Y., Levy, N., Lockwood, P. L., Longoni, C., Ortega, A. L., Loschelder, D. D., Lu, J. G., Luo, Y., Luomba, J., Lutz, A. E., Majer, J. M., Markowitz, E., Marsh, A. A., Mascarenhas, K. L., Mbilingi, B., Mbungu, W., McHugh, C., Meijers, M. H. C., Mercier, H., Mhagama, F. L., Michalakis, K., Mikus, N., Milliron, S., Mitkidis, P., Monge-Rodríguez, F. S., Mora, Y. L., Moreau, D., Motoki, K., Moyano, M., Mus, M., Navajas, J., Nguyen, T. L., Nguyen, D. M., Nguyen, T., Niemi, L., Nijssen, S. R. R., Nilsonne, G., Nitschke, J. P., Nockur, L., Okura, R., Öner, S., Özdoğru, A. A., Palumbo, H., Panagopoulos, C., Panasiti, M. S., Pärnamets, P., Paruzel-Czachura, M., Pavlov, Y. G., Payán-Gómez, C., Pearson, A. R., Costa, L. P. D., Petrowsky, H. M., Pfattheicher, S., Pham, N. T., Ponizovskiy, V., Pretus, C., Rêgo, G. G., Reimann, R., Rhoads, S. A., Riano-Moreno, J., Richter, I., Röer, J. P., Rosa-Sullivan, J., Ross, R. M., Sabherwal, A., Saito, T., Sarrasin, O., Say, N., Schmid, K., Schmitt, M. T., Schoenegger, P., Scholz, C., Schug, M. G., Schulreich, S., Shreedhar, G., Shuman, E., Sivan, S., Sjåstad, H., Soliman, M., Soud, K., Spampatti, T., Sparkman, G., Spasovski, O., Stanley, S. K., Stern, J. A., Strahm, N., Suko, Y., Sul, S., Syropoulos, S., Taylor, N. C., Tedaldi, E., Tinghög, G., Huynh, L. D. T., Travaglino, G. A., Tsakiris, M., Tüter, İ., Tyrala, M., Uluğ, Ö. M., Urbanek, A., Valko, D., Linden, S. V. D., Schie, K. V., Stekelenburg, A. V., Vanags, E., Västfjäll, D., Vesely, S., Vintr, J., Vranka, M., Wanguche, P. O., Willer, R., Wojcik, A. D., Xu, R., Yadav, A., Zawisza, M., Zhao, X., Zhao, J., Żuk, D. & Bavel, J. J. V., 09.02.2024, In: Science Advances. 10, 6, 19 p., eadj5778.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Correction: The Open Anchoring Quest Dataset: Anchored Estimates from 96 Studies on Anchoring Effects (Journal of Open Psychology Data, (2022), 10, 1, (16), 10.5334/jopd.67)

Röseler, L., Weber, L., Helgerth, K., Stich, E., Günther, M., Tegethoff, P., Wagner, F. S., Ambrus, E., Antunovic, M., Barrera-Lemarchand, F., Halali, E., Ioannidis, K., Genschow, O., McKay, R., Milstein, N., Molden, D. C., Papenmeier, F., Pavlovic, Z., Rinn, R., Schreiter, M. L., Zimdahl, M. F., Allen, E., Bahník, Š., Bermeitinger, C., Blower, F. B. N., Bögler, H. L., Burgmer, P., Cheek, N. N., Dorsch, L., Fels, S. A., Frech, M. L., Freira, L., Harris, A. J. L., Hartig, B., Häusser, J. A., Hedgebeth, M. V., Henkel, M., Horvath, D., Imhoff, R., Intelmann, P., Klamar, A., Knappe, E., Köppel, L-M. A., Krueger, S. M., Lagator, S., Bóo, F. L., Navajas, J., Norem, J. K., Novak, J., Onuki, Y., Page, E., Pearton, J., Ponader, S., Rebholz, T. R., Rostekova, A., Sartorio, M., Schindler, S., Seida, C., Shanks, D. R., Siems, M. C., Speekenbrink, M., Stäglich, P., Starkulla, M., Stitz, M., Straube, T., Thies, K., Thum, E., Ueda, K., Undorf, M., Urlichich, D., Vadillo, M. A., Wolf, A. H., Zhou, A. & Schütz, A., 23.08.2024, In: Journal of Open Psychology Data. 12, 1, 3 p., 8.

Research output: Journal contributions › Comments / Debate / Reports › Research

DOI