Management of 'technology push' development projects

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Management of 'technology push' development projects. / Herstatt, Cornelius; Lettl, Christopher.
In: International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 27, No. 2-3, 2004, p. 155-175.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a2e3ebddda4041a1891462f35ee8ebe0,
title = "Management of 'technology push' development projects",
abstract = "Discussion of 'market pull' versus 'technology push' approaches in the field of business innovation research has followed a certain trend. The empirical research undertaken until now has been concerned in particular with the question of how each of these approaches differently influences the subsequent success of the innovation. We do not wish to continue this discussion in our paper, rather we assume that both approaches are justified depending upon the importance of the relevant innovation source, the desired degree of innovation and the respective characteristics of the industry in question. We concern ourselves with the characteristics that result in the 'technology push' for the management of innovation projects and what implications can be derived from practical project management organisation. In doing so, we concentrate upon all market-related activities, in particular the identification and verification of application areas for new technology. After contrasting the various characteristics of the 'technology push' and 'market pull' approaches, the market-related characteristics of 'technology push' projects are outlined. In this context, current instruments and methods of qualitative market research are introduced and their usefulness discussed. In addition, organisational-structural aspects as well as strategic and operative aspects of 'technology push' project management will be highlighted.",
keywords = "Marketing, Project management, Technology push, Management studies",
author = "Cornelius Herstatt and Christopher Lettl",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1504/ijtm.2004.003950",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "155--175",
journal = "International Journal of Technology Management",
issn = "0267-5730",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd",
number = "2-3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of 'technology push' development projects

AU - Herstatt, Cornelius

AU - Lettl, Christopher

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Discussion of 'market pull' versus 'technology push' approaches in the field of business innovation research has followed a certain trend. The empirical research undertaken until now has been concerned in particular with the question of how each of these approaches differently influences the subsequent success of the innovation. We do not wish to continue this discussion in our paper, rather we assume that both approaches are justified depending upon the importance of the relevant innovation source, the desired degree of innovation and the respective characteristics of the industry in question. We concern ourselves with the characteristics that result in the 'technology push' for the management of innovation projects and what implications can be derived from practical project management organisation. In doing so, we concentrate upon all market-related activities, in particular the identification and verification of application areas for new technology. After contrasting the various characteristics of the 'technology push' and 'market pull' approaches, the market-related characteristics of 'technology push' projects are outlined. In this context, current instruments and methods of qualitative market research are introduced and their usefulness discussed. In addition, organisational-structural aspects as well as strategic and operative aspects of 'technology push' project management will be highlighted.

AB - Discussion of 'market pull' versus 'technology push' approaches in the field of business innovation research has followed a certain trend. The empirical research undertaken until now has been concerned in particular with the question of how each of these approaches differently influences the subsequent success of the innovation. We do not wish to continue this discussion in our paper, rather we assume that both approaches are justified depending upon the importance of the relevant innovation source, the desired degree of innovation and the respective characteristics of the industry in question. We concern ourselves with the characteristics that result in the 'technology push' for the management of innovation projects and what implications can be derived from practical project management organisation. In doing so, we concentrate upon all market-related activities, in particular the identification and verification of application areas for new technology. After contrasting the various characteristics of the 'technology push' and 'market pull' approaches, the market-related characteristics of 'technology push' projects are outlined. In this context, current instruments and methods of qualitative market research are introduced and their usefulness discussed. In addition, organisational-structural aspects as well as strategic and operative aspects of 'technology push' project management will be highlighted.

KW - Marketing

KW - Project management

KW - Technology push

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542345694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1504/ijtm.2004.003950

DO - 10.1504/ijtm.2004.003950

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:1542345694

VL - 27

SP - 155

EP - 175

JO - International Journal of Technology Management

JF - International Journal of Technology Management

SN - 0267-5730

IS - 2-3

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Wiebke Keller

Publications

  1. Developing innovations based on analogies
  2. Guest Editorial
  3. Optically stimulated luminescence dating of young fluvial deposits of the Middle Elbe River Flood Plains using different age models
  4. Management of 'technology push' development projects
  5. Monopsonistic Labour Markets
  6. Looking for a Needle in a Haystack
  7. Reviewing the Field of External Knowledge Search for Innovation
  8. Das Land ist ruhig – noch! Notizen zu einer Durchquerung
  9. Evidence that non-social autism traits in the general population are correlated with spatial processing of biological motion
  10. Microfoundations of open innovation in schools: overcoming teachers’ not-invented-here syndrome with transformational leadership and leader-member-exchange
  11. THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF THE CHEMISTRY FIELD IN BRAZIL.
  12. Polizeigewalt
  13. Toward a better understanding of corporate accelerator models
  14. Barriers to user innovation
  15. Free revealing in open innovation
  16. Glue Embolization of Gastroesophageal Varices during Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Improves Survival Compared to Coil-only Embolization—A Single-Center Retrospective Study
  17. Práticas integrativas e complementares no sistema único de saúde do brasil
  18. Thinking with Laughter: Notes on Walter Benjamin’s Humour
  19. Über die allmähliche Verfertigung des Selbst beim Schreiben
  20. Structuring success: How issue-packaging agendas foster better joint outcomes in multi-issue negotiations
  21. How to use analogies for breakthrough innovations
  22. Investigating Learning Assistance by Demonstration for Robotic Wheelchairs
  23. The freedom-fighters
  24. The iceberg of science identity
  25. The teaching area
  26. The vegan trend and the microfoundations of institutional change
  27. Entrepreneurial Members in Online Innovation Communities Blessing or Curse?
  28. Market research for radical innovations - lessons from a lead user project in the field of medical products
  29. Staatliche Gewalt
  30. From a Multicultural to Multinatural Science Education
  31. Gender diversity in academic publishing—comment on Galak and Kahn (2021)
  32. Digitale Transformation gestalten