Livelihood strategies, capital assets, and food security in rural Southwest Ethiopia

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Livelihood strategies, capital assets, and food security in rural Southwest Ethiopia. / Manlosa, Aisa O.; Hanspach, Jan; Schultner, Jannik et al.
In: Food Security, Vol. 11, No. 1, 15.02.2019, p. 167-181.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Manlosa AO, Hanspach J, Schultner J, Dorresteijn I, Fischer J. Livelihood strategies, capital assets, and food security in rural Southwest Ethiopia. Food Security. 2019 Feb 15;11(1):167-181. doi: 10.1007/s12571-018-00883-x

Bibtex

@article{91d1b2157ed84d90bf5d9eed0a4569da,
title = "Livelihood strategies, capital assets, and food security in rural Southwest Ethiopia",
abstract = "Households combine capital assets in a process involving human agency and resourcefulness to construct livelihood strategies and generate well-being outcomes. Here, we (1) characterized types of livelihood strategies; (2) determined how different capital assets are associated with different livelihood strategies; and (3) determined how livelihood strategies differed in food security outcomes. We conducted a survey in southwestern Ethiopia and used principal component and cluster analyses. Five types of livelihood strategies, which differed mainly in food and cash crops comprising the strategy, were identified. These were, in order of decreasing food security: {\textquoteleft}three food crops, coffee and khat{\textquoteright}, n = 68; {\textquoteleft}three food crops and khat{\textquoteright}, n = 59; {\textquoteleft}two food crops, coffee and khat{\textquoteright}, n = 78; {\textquoteleft}two food crops and khat{\textquoteright}, n = 88; and {\textquoteleft}one food crop, coffee and khat{\textquoteright}, n = 44. The livelihood strategy {\textquoteleft}three food crops, coffee and khat{\textquoteright} was associated with a wide range of capital assets, particularly having larger aggregate farm field size and learning from other farmers. A generalized linear model showed that livelihood strategies were significantly associated with food security outcomes. Particularly, a high number of food crops in a strategy was linked with relatively high food security. In this context, diversified livelihood strategies primarily through having a mix of food crops for subsistence, in combination with cash crops for income, are important for food security. This suggests a need to rethink dominant policy narratives, which have a narrow focus on increasing productivity and commercialization as the primary pathway to food security.",
keywords = "Agriculture, Diversification, Ethiopia, Food policies, Livelihood strategies, Smallholder farming, Sustainability Science, Environmental planning",
author = "Manlosa, {Aisa O.} and Jan Hanspach and Jannik Schultner and Ine Dorresteijn and J{\"o}rn Fischer",
note = "Funding Information: Funding This research work received funding from the European Research Council under the EU{\textquoteright}s 7th Framework Programme with project ID 614278. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019, The Author(s).",
year = "2019",
month = feb,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s12571-018-00883-x",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "167--181",
journal = "Food Security",
issn = "1876-4517",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Livelihood strategies, capital assets, and food security in rural Southwest Ethiopia

AU - Manlosa, Aisa O.

AU - Hanspach, Jan

AU - Schultner, Jannik

AU - Dorresteijn, Ine

AU - Fischer, Jörn

N1 - Funding Information: Funding This research work received funding from the European Research Council under the EU’s 7th Framework Programme with project ID 614278. Publisher Copyright: © 2019, The Author(s).

PY - 2019/2/15

Y1 - 2019/2/15

N2 - Households combine capital assets in a process involving human agency and resourcefulness to construct livelihood strategies and generate well-being outcomes. Here, we (1) characterized types of livelihood strategies; (2) determined how different capital assets are associated with different livelihood strategies; and (3) determined how livelihood strategies differed in food security outcomes. We conducted a survey in southwestern Ethiopia and used principal component and cluster analyses. Five types of livelihood strategies, which differed mainly in food and cash crops comprising the strategy, were identified. These were, in order of decreasing food security: ‘three food crops, coffee and khat’, n = 68; ‘three food crops and khat’, n = 59; ‘two food crops, coffee and khat’, n = 78; ‘two food crops and khat’, n = 88; and ‘one food crop, coffee and khat’, n = 44. The livelihood strategy ‘three food crops, coffee and khat’ was associated with a wide range of capital assets, particularly having larger aggregate farm field size and learning from other farmers. A generalized linear model showed that livelihood strategies were significantly associated with food security outcomes. Particularly, a high number of food crops in a strategy was linked with relatively high food security. In this context, diversified livelihood strategies primarily through having a mix of food crops for subsistence, in combination with cash crops for income, are important for food security. This suggests a need to rethink dominant policy narratives, which have a narrow focus on increasing productivity and commercialization as the primary pathway to food security.

AB - Households combine capital assets in a process involving human agency and resourcefulness to construct livelihood strategies and generate well-being outcomes. Here, we (1) characterized types of livelihood strategies; (2) determined how different capital assets are associated with different livelihood strategies; and (3) determined how livelihood strategies differed in food security outcomes. We conducted a survey in southwestern Ethiopia and used principal component and cluster analyses. Five types of livelihood strategies, which differed mainly in food and cash crops comprising the strategy, were identified. These were, in order of decreasing food security: ‘three food crops, coffee and khat’, n = 68; ‘three food crops and khat’, n = 59; ‘two food crops, coffee and khat’, n = 78; ‘two food crops and khat’, n = 88; and ‘one food crop, coffee and khat’, n = 44. The livelihood strategy ‘three food crops, coffee and khat’ was associated with a wide range of capital assets, particularly having larger aggregate farm field size and learning from other farmers. A generalized linear model showed that livelihood strategies were significantly associated with food security outcomes. Particularly, a high number of food crops in a strategy was linked with relatively high food security. In this context, diversified livelihood strategies primarily through having a mix of food crops for subsistence, in combination with cash crops for income, are important for food security. This suggests a need to rethink dominant policy narratives, which have a narrow focus on increasing productivity and commercialization as the primary pathway to food security.

KW - Agriculture

KW - Diversification

KW - Ethiopia

KW - Food policies

KW - Livelihood strategies

KW - Smallholder farming

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Environmental planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060635427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12571-018-00883-x

DO - 10.1007/s12571-018-00883-x

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 30931047

AN - SCOPUS:85060635427

VL - 11

SP - 167

EP - 181

JO - Food Security

JF - Food Security

SN - 1876-4517

IS - 1

ER -

Documents

DOI