Linking Prefunding Venture Structure and Venture Capital Exit Performance

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Linking Prefunding Venture Structure and Venture Capital Exit Performance. / Streletzki, Jan-Georg.
In: International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Vol. 5, No. 4, 09.12.2013, p. 345-368.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1c6a731799574e909f481bb85fbb698c,
title = "Linking Prefunding Venture Structure and Venture Capital Exit Performance",
abstract = "This study investigates the state of the art on venture capital (VC) success prediction and compares it to the findings on general start up performance, and new technology-based venture (NTBV) performance in particular. It is still generally believed that the factors responsible for general venture performance also drive VC performance. This study argues that there is a need for differentiation: VCs and founders pursue different goals, and VC funded ventures grow under different conditions than their non-funded counterparts. Results of a structured literature review show, while team-related predictors have a comparatively lower impact, market related predictors have a higher impact on exit performance than on NTBV performance. Also, VC-specific predictors like timing and distance are shown to have an influence on exit performance.",
keywords = "Entrepreneurship, Assets, Exit Performance, Industry, Location, Prefunding, Success factors, Success predictors, Team, Time, VC, Venture capital, Management studies, Entrepreneurship",
author = "Jan-Georg Streletzki",
year = "2013",
month = dec,
day = "9",
doi = "10.1504/IJEV.2013.058166",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "345--368",
journal = "International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing",
issn = "1742-5360",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linking Prefunding Venture Structure and Venture Capital Exit Performance

AU - Streletzki, Jan-Georg

PY - 2013/12/9

Y1 - 2013/12/9

N2 - This study investigates the state of the art on venture capital (VC) success prediction and compares it to the findings on general start up performance, and new technology-based venture (NTBV) performance in particular. It is still generally believed that the factors responsible for general venture performance also drive VC performance. This study argues that there is a need for differentiation: VCs and founders pursue different goals, and VC funded ventures grow under different conditions than their non-funded counterparts. Results of a structured literature review show, while team-related predictors have a comparatively lower impact, market related predictors have a higher impact on exit performance than on NTBV performance. Also, VC-specific predictors like timing and distance are shown to have an influence on exit performance.

AB - This study investigates the state of the art on venture capital (VC) success prediction and compares it to the findings on general start up performance, and new technology-based venture (NTBV) performance in particular. It is still generally believed that the factors responsible for general venture performance also drive VC performance. This study argues that there is a need for differentiation: VCs and founders pursue different goals, and VC funded ventures grow under different conditions than their non-funded counterparts. Results of a structured literature review show, while team-related predictors have a comparatively lower impact, market related predictors have a higher impact on exit performance than on NTBV performance. Also, VC-specific predictors like timing and distance are shown to have an influence on exit performance.

KW - Entrepreneurship

KW - Assets

KW - Exit Performance

KW - Industry

KW - Location

KW - Prefunding

KW - Success factors

KW - Success predictors

KW - Team

KW - Time

KW - VC

KW - Venture capital

KW - Management studies

KW - Entrepreneurship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890519887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1504/IJEV.2013.058166

DO - 10.1504/IJEV.2013.058166

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 5

SP - 345

EP - 368

JO - International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing

JF - International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing

SN - 1742-5360

IS - 4

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Future-Proofing Fuel Cells
  2. Provocative Alloys
  3. Log in and breathe out: efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an online sleep training for teachers affected by work-related strain
  4. Workshop: 20 years health promotion research in and on settings
  5. Comment on "nomenclature, Chemical Abstracts Service Numbers, Isomer Enumeration, Ring Strain, and Stereochemistry
  6. Monitoring mental stressors at work with the work health audit instrument factors
  7. Was tun, Herr Luhmann?
  8. Volunteering in retirement motivation and design of use of Senior Expert Services
  9. Magnús eiríksson
  10. A Longitudinal Study of Great Ape Cognition
  11. Two types of ‘enough’
  12. Toward a Kaleidoscopic Understanding of Anonymity
  13. Fremdfinanzierung junger Unternehmen
  14. Digital guided self-help for eating disorders
  15. Collisionless Spectral Kinetic Simulation of Ideal Multipole Resonance Probe
  16. Fallstudie
  17. Strategies to Induce Non-cooperating Countries to Join a Climate-policy Coalition
  18. Modeling the C(o)urse of Privacy-critical Location-based Services
  19. Weblogs und Wikis, [1]
  20. What Do We Know About Modernization Today?
  21. Addressing social representations in socio-technical transitions with the case of shale gas
  22. Are Levels of Democracy Influenced by Mass Attitudes
  23. The role of self-evaluation in predicting attitudes toward supporters of COVID-19-related conspiracy theories
  24. Trust in government regarding COVID-19 and its associations with preventive health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the pandemic
  25. Self-efficacy in classroom management, classroom disturbances, and emotional exhaustion
  26. Effekte inter-organisationaler Balanced Scorecards
  27. Dynamic capabilities?
  28. Decision Support System
  29. Benchmarking nesting aids for cavity-nesting bees and wasps
  30. § 328: Beschränkung der Rechte