Linking modes of research to their scientific and societal outcomes. Evidence from 81 sustainability-oriented research projects

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{919ffc40df39486897dba59b3c56e940,
title = "Linking modes of research to their scientific and societal outcomes. Evidence from 81 sustainability-oriented research projects",
abstract = "Sustainability-oriented research has increasingly adopted “new” modes of research promoted under labels such as {\textquoteleft}post-normal science{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}mode 2 knowledge production{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}transdisciplinarity{\textquoteright}, aiming to address societally relevant problems and to produce {\textquoteleft}socially robust{\textquoteright} knowledge by involving relevant scientific disciplines and non-academic actors into the research.We present the results of a comparative quantitative analysis of 81 completed sustainability-oriented research projects, coupled with an in-depth study of six projects, to empirically investigate the assumed connections between research modes and societal and academic project outcomes.Statistical analysis suggests that contributions from practitioners in early phases of research projects positively influence certain societal and practice-relevant outcomes. By contrast, including non-academic actors and practitioner knowledge into research negatively impacts academic outputs and citations, indicating a trade-off between academic and societal impacts. Yet projects which apply structured methods of knowledge integration score generally higher on academic outputs and citations. Moreover, the funding context affects both research mode and research outcomes. Finally, practitioner involvement negatively affects completing of PhD projects.Findings from the in-depth study reinforce a trade-off between the societal and academic impact of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary sustainability-oriented research. We find that projects which had a double research objective on academic and societal outcomes but which did not specify how to realize both, neglected either the academic or the societal impact during the research process. Moreover, we find that a well-designed combination of disciplinary as well as inter- and transdisciplinary project phases helped projects to meet both demands.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, transdisciplinarity, research evaluation, sustainability, impact assessment, mixed-methods approach, Sustainability, impact assessment, Transdisciplinary studies, Transdisciplinarity, Mixed-Methods approach, Research evaluation",
author = "Jens Newig and Jahn, {Stephanie Verena} and Lang, {Daniel J.} and Judith Kahle and Matthias Bergmann",
note = "Funding Information: In this study, we combined comparative analysis of 81completed sustainability-oriented research projects (large-N study) with six in-depth case studies (in-depth study) to empirically investigate the assumed connections between research modes and societal and academic project outcomes. The sample comprises projects with a substantial social science share funded by the two major German research funding institutions. These are the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Studied projects cover a wide spectrum of research modes, ranging from basic research that is barely interdisciplinary to highly inter- and transdisciplinary projects including a variety of extra-academic actors in different project phases. Funding Information: The performed t-test shows with a significance level of p = 0.06 no differences in the mean of Goal_achievement between projects in the mission-oriented funding context (BMBF) and bottom-up funded projects (DFG). Funding Information: We would like to thank the members of our advisory group, Antonietta di Giulio, Rico Defila, Michael Pregernig, Arnim Wiek and Michael Stauffacher, for their constructive and valuable feedback in early stages of this research; the German Research Foundation for providing the funding for the research project “Modes of sustainability-related research in comparison (MONA): Modes of research and their impact on scientific and societal project outcomes” under grant numbers NE1207/4-1 to Jens Newig and LA3024/1-1 to Daniel J. Lang; staff from the German Research Foundation and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research for their support in preparing the data collection; project heads, researchers and practitioners involved in the investigated sustainability-oriented research projects for providing us with project documents, as well as for participating in a survey and semi-structured interviews; our student assistants Marie Josefine Hintz, Marie Wei{\ss}, Marion Blome, Sophia Sch{\"o}nig, Maria Br{\"u}ck, Silke B{\"o}lts, Alina Langkau, Franziska Steinbr{\"u}gge, Jakob Wondra and Inga Melchior for their long-term and outstanding support with regard to data collection and data editing in preparation for this article. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 The Authors",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.008",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "147--155",
journal = "Environmental Science & Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linking modes of research to their scientific and societal outcomes. Evidence from 81 sustainability-oriented research projects

AU - Newig, Jens

AU - Jahn, Stephanie Verena

AU - Lang, Daniel J.

AU - Kahle, Judith

AU - Bergmann, Matthias

N1 - Funding Information: In this study, we combined comparative analysis of 81completed sustainability-oriented research projects (large-N study) with six in-depth case studies (in-depth study) to empirically investigate the assumed connections between research modes and societal and academic project outcomes. The sample comprises projects with a substantial social science share funded by the two major German research funding institutions. These are the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Studied projects cover a wide spectrum of research modes, ranging from basic research that is barely interdisciplinary to highly inter- and transdisciplinary projects including a variety of extra-academic actors in different project phases. Funding Information: The performed t-test shows with a significance level of p = 0.06 no differences in the mean of Goal_achievement between projects in the mission-oriented funding context (BMBF) and bottom-up funded projects (DFG). Funding Information: We would like to thank the members of our advisory group, Antonietta di Giulio, Rico Defila, Michael Pregernig, Arnim Wiek and Michael Stauffacher, for their constructive and valuable feedback in early stages of this research; the German Research Foundation for providing the funding for the research project “Modes of sustainability-related research in comparison (MONA): Modes of research and their impact on scientific and societal project outcomes” under grant numbers NE1207/4-1 to Jens Newig and LA3024/1-1 to Daniel J. Lang; staff from the German Research Foundation and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research for their support in preparing the data collection; project heads, researchers and practitioners involved in the investigated sustainability-oriented research projects for providing us with project documents, as well as for participating in a survey and semi-structured interviews; our student assistants Marie Josefine Hintz, Marie Weiß, Marion Blome, Sophia Schönig, Maria Brück, Silke Bölts, Alina Langkau, Franziska Steinbrügge, Jakob Wondra and Inga Melchior for their long-term and outstanding support with regard to data collection and data editing in preparation for this article. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 The Authors

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Sustainability-oriented research has increasingly adopted “new” modes of research promoted under labels such as ‘post-normal science’, ‘mode 2 knowledge production’ or ‘transdisciplinarity’, aiming to address societally relevant problems and to produce ‘socially robust’ knowledge by involving relevant scientific disciplines and non-academic actors into the research.We present the results of a comparative quantitative analysis of 81 completed sustainability-oriented research projects, coupled with an in-depth study of six projects, to empirically investigate the assumed connections between research modes and societal and academic project outcomes.Statistical analysis suggests that contributions from practitioners in early phases of research projects positively influence certain societal and practice-relevant outcomes. By contrast, including non-academic actors and practitioner knowledge into research negatively impacts academic outputs and citations, indicating a trade-off between academic and societal impacts. Yet projects which apply structured methods of knowledge integration score generally higher on academic outputs and citations. Moreover, the funding context affects both research mode and research outcomes. Finally, practitioner involvement negatively affects completing of PhD projects.Findings from the in-depth study reinforce a trade-off between the societal and academic impact of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary sustainability-oriented research. We find that projects which had a double research objective on academic and societal outcomes but which did not specify how to realize both, neglected either the academic or the societal impact during the research process. Moreover, we find that a well-designed combination of disciplinary as well as inter- and transdisciplinary project phases helped projects to meet both demands.

AB - Sustainability-oriented research has increasingly adopted “new” modes of research promoted under labels such as ‘post-normal science’, ‘mode 2 knowledge production’ or ‘transdisciplinarity’, aiming to address societally relevant problems and to produce ‘socially robust’ knowledge by involving relevant scientific disciplines and non-academic actors into the research.We present the results of a comparative quantitative analysis of 81 completed sustainability-oriented research projects, coupled with an in-depth study of six projects, to empirically investigate the assumed connections between research modes and societal and academic project outcomes.Statistical analysis suggests that contributions from practitioners in early phases of research projects positively influence certain societal and practice-relevant outcomes. By contrast, including non-academic actors and practitioner knowledge into research negatively impacts academic outputs and citations, indicating a trade-off between academic and societal impacts. Yet projects which apply structured methods of knowledge integration score generally higher on academic outputs and citations. Moreover, the funding context affects both research mode and research outcomes. Finally, practitioner involvement negatively affects completing of PhD projects.Findings from the in-depth study reinforce a trade-off between the societal and academic impact of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary sustainability-oriented research. We find that projects which had a double research objective on academic and societal outcomes but which did not specify how to realize both, neglected either the academic or the societal impact during the research process. Moreover, we find that a well-designed combination of disciplinary as well as inter- and transdisciplinary project phases helped projects to meet both demands.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - transdisciplinarity

KW - research evaluation

KW - sustainability

KW - impact assessment

KW - mixed-methods approach

KW - Sustainability

KW - impact assessment

KW - Transdisciplinary studies

KW - Transdisciplinarity

KW - Mixed-Methods approach

KW - Research evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071078716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f761d0eb-a2f7-3704-81c2-31159e0d1965/

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.008

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 101

SP - 147

EP - 155

JO - Environmental Science & Policy

JF - Environmental Science & Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Calibration of a simple method for determining ammonia volatilization in the field - Comparative measurements in Henan Province, China
  2. Inner loop model predictive control and outer loop PI reference governor for PMSMs with input and state saturation for torque control
  3. The impact of the 2004 EU-enlargement on enterprise performance and exports of service enterprises in the German eastern border region
  4. A PD regulator to minimize noise effect using a minimal variance method for soft landing control of an electromagnetic valve actuator
  5. Zum Einfluss des Lösungsglühens und Aushärtens auf die Mikrostruktur von ZK40-Legierungen, modifiziert durch Zugaben von Ca, Gd, Nd und Y
  6. Reading Comprehension as Embodied Action: Exploratory Findings on Nonlinear Eye Movement Dynamics and Comprehension of Scientific Texts
  7. Leading indicators for the US housing market: New empirical evidence and thoughts about implications for risk managers and ESG investors
  8. Resilient Privacy Preservation Through a Presumed Secrecy Mechanism for Mobility and Localization in Intelligent Transportation Systems
  9. Associations between the financial and industry expertise of audit committee members and Key Audit Matters within related audit reports
  10. Working group on dry grasslands in the nordic and baltic region - Outline of the project and first results for the class Festuco-Brometea
  11. Ammonia volatilization and yield response of energy crops after fertilization with biogas residues in a coastal marsh of Northern Germany
  12. Eemian landscape response to climatic shifts and evidence for northerly Neanderthal occupation at a palaeolake margin in northern Germany
  13. The role of supervisor support for dealing with customer verbal aggression. Differences between ethnic minority and ethnic majority workers
  14. Does it pay to be active on many foreign markets? profitability in german multi-market exporters and importers from manufacturing industries
  15. Institutional ownership and board governance. A structured literature review on the heterogeneous monitoring role of institutional investors
  16. Effect of overlapping audit and compensation committee memberships on the readability of management compensation reports in the German HDAX
  17. New evidence for vegetation development and timing of Upper Middle Pleistocene interglacials in Northern Germany and tentative correlations
  18. A New Framework for Production Planning and Control to Support the Positioning in Fields of Tension Created by Opposing Logistic Objectives
  19. Enhancement of the mechanical properties of semi-stationary bobbin tool friction stir welded joints in AA2219 through post-weld heat treatment
  20. Long-term health-related quality of life after decompressive hemicraniectomy in stroke patients with life-threatening space-occupying brain edema
  21. Using a Bivariate Polynomial in an EKF for State and Inductance Estimations in the Presence of Saturation Effects to Adaptively Control a PMSM
  22. Kosten-Effektivitäts-Analyse eines Online Programmes zur Reduktion von depressiven Beschwerden bei Personen mit Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 und Typ 2
  23. Entwicklung und erste Validierung eines Situational-Judgement-Instruments zur Erfassung von Kompetenzen im Bereich des Ressourcenmanagements (ReMI)
  24. Effects of introspective vs. extraspective instruction in scaling of hedonic properties of flavouring ingredients by Chinese and German subjects
  25. Zusammenhänge zwischen einem gemeinsamen Unterricht und kognitiven und non-kognitiven Outcomes von Kindern ohne sonderpädagogischen Förderbedarf
  26. Effects of different video- or text-based reflection stimuli on pre-service teachers’ emotions, immersion, cognitive load and knowledge-based reasoning
  27. Perspektive Nachhaltigkeit: Zur beruflichen Zufriedenheit und Belastung von psychiatrischen Fachärzten in der ambulanten Versorgung in der Schweiz
  28. Die Bedeutung des pädagogisch-psychologischen Wissens für die Qualität der Klassenführung und den Lernzuwachs der Schüler/innen im Physikunterricht
  29. Valuing regulating services (climate regulation) from UK terrestrial ecosystems, Report to the Economics Team of the UK National Ecosystem Assessment
  30. An IAD framework analysis of minigrid institutions for sustainable rural electrification in East Africa
  31. Die Implementierung von Prüfungsausschüssen/Audit Committees des Aufsichts-rats/Board of Directors mit unabhängigen und finanzkompetenten Mitgliedern
  32. Vom Betrieb in die Domäne – Partizipative Entwicklung nachhaltigkeitsorientierter Lernaufgaben für die Berufsausbildung in der Lebensmittelindustrie
  33. Zusammenhänge der Klassenkomposition an Förderschulen und allgemeinen Schulen mit schulischen Kompetenzen, akademischem Selbstkonzept und Interesse
  34. Netzwerkbasierte Betrachtung von ko-konstruktiven Interaktionsprozessen im Unterricht – Ein Ansatz zur Beschreibung und Analyse von Angebot und Nutzung
  35. Comparing self-reported and O*NET-based assessments of job control as predictors of self-rated health for non-Hispanic whites and racial/ethnic minorities
  36. The effect of extrusion ratio and material flow on the mechanical properties of aluminum profiles solid state recycled from 6060 aluminum alloy chips
  37. Zum Einfluss des pädagogisch-psychologischen Professionswissens auf die Unterrichtsqualität und das situationale Interesse der Schülerinnen und Schüler.