Light treatment of a complex problem: The law of self-defence in the wall case

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Light treatment of a complex problem: The law of self-defence in the wall case. / Tams, Christian J.
In: European Journal of International Law, Vol. 16, No. 5, 01.11.2005, p. 963-978.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e8d9d659763241f0a6bd55107eebc849,
title = "Light treatment of a complex problem: The law of self-defence in the wall case",
abstract = "In its recent Wall Opinion, the International Court of Justice gave rather short shrift to Israel's claims that the construction of the wall could be justified as an act of self-defence in the sense of Article 51 United Nations Charter. This article assesses the Court's approach and places it in the broader context of ICJ pronouncements on the use of force. It suggests that the Court failed to appreciate the complex legal problems to which Israel's claim gave rise, in particular the problem of self-defence against attacks by non-state actors. It shows that the Court's restrictive understanding of self-defence, while following the 1986 merits judgment in the Nicaragua case, is difficult to bring in line with modern state practice, and increases the pressure to admit other, non-written, exceptions to Article 2(4) of the UN Charter. {\textcopyright} EJIL 2006; all rights reserved.",
keywords = "Law",
author = "Tams, {Christian J.}",
year = "2005",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ejil/chi152",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "963--978",
journal = "European Journal of International Law",
issn = "0938-5428",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Light treatment of a complex problem

T2 - The law of self-defence in the wall case

AU - Tams, Christian J.

PY - 2005/11/1

Y1 - 2005/11/1

N2 - In its recent Wall Opinion, the International Court of Justice gave rather short shrift to Israel's claims that the construction of the wall could be justified as an act of self-defence in the sense of Article 51 United Nations Charter. This article assesses the Court's approach and places it in the broader context of ICJ pronouncements on the use of force. It suggests that the Court failed to appreciate the complex legal problems to which Israel's claim gave rise, in particular the problem of self-defence against attacks by non-state actors. It shows that the Court's restrictive understanding of self-defence, while following the 1986 merits judgment in the Nicaragua case, is difficult to bring in line with modern state practice, and increases the pressure to admit other, non-written, exceptions to Article 2(4) of the UN Charter. © EJIL 2006; all rights reserved.

AB - In its recent Wall Opinion, the International Court of Justice gave rather short shrift to Israel's claims that the construction of the wall could be justified as an act of self-defence in the sense of Article 51 United Nations Charter. This article assesses the Court's approach and places it in the broader context of ICJ pronouncements on the use of force. It suggests that the Court failed to appreciate the complex legal problems to which Israel's claim gave rise, in particular the problem of self-defence against attacks by non-state actors. It shows that the Court's restrictive understanding of self-defence, while following the 1986 merits judgment in the Nicaragua case, is difficult to bring in line with modern state practice, and increases the pressure to admit other, non-written, exceptions to Article 2(4) of the UN Charter. © EJIL 2006; all rights reserved.

KW - Law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31444437541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9813e1dc-601a-340d-a9d9-347073028eed/

U2 - 10.1093/ejil/chi152

DO - 10.1093/ejil/chi152

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:31444437541

VL - 16

SP - 963

EP - 978

JO - European Journal of International Law

JF - European Journal of International Law

SN - 0938-5428

IS - 5

ER -

Links

DOI