Life-protecting neoliberalism: Hayek and the biopolitics of abortion in Chile
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Economy and Society, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2020, p. 596-618.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Life-protecting neoliberalism
T2 - Hayek and the biopolitics of abortion in Chile
AU - Martinez Mateo, Marina
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - ‘The law protects the life of those about to be born. The death penalty is only applied in [determined] cases of crimes’–says the Constitution of Chile, which was developed and implemented by Augusto Pinochet’s military regime. Why must unborn life be protected while the lives of single persons can be exposed in the death penalty? And why was this regime, famously known for expansive economic liberalization, so concerned with protecting unborn life? These questions are addressed on the basis of two assumptions: (1) Life-protection may become a crucial element of neoliberal functioning; and (2) This protection requires an authoritarian state that acts against living subjects and represses reproductive rights. These assumptions are pursued through an analysis of the discussions on the right to life in the Constituent Commission, taking Hayek’s theory of the social as a theoretic background. In this way, the constellation in Chile contributes to a deeper understanding of authoritarian neoliberalism in its current forms.
AB - ‘The law protects the life of those about to be born. The death penalty is only applied in [determined] cases of crimes’–says the Constitution of Chile, which was developed and implemented by Augusto Pinochet’s military regime. Why must unborn life be protected while the lives of single persons can be exposed in the death penalty? And why was this regime, famously known for expansive economic liberalization, so concerned with protecting unborn life? These questions are addressed on the basis of two assumptions: (1) Life-protection may become a crucial element of neoliberal functioning; and (2) This protection requires an authoritarian state that acts against living subjects and represses reproductive rights. These assumptions are pursued through an analysis of the discussions on the right to life in the Constituent Commission, taking Hayek’s theory of the social as a theoretic background. In this way, the constellation in Chile contributes to a deeper understanding of authoritarian neoliberalism in its current forms.
KW - abortion
KW - authoritarian liberalism and neoliberalism
KW - Chile
KW - Foucault
KW - Hayek
KW - right to life
KW - Philosophy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096581598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03085147.2020.1789366
DO - 10.1080/03085147.2020.1789366
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85096581598
VL - 49
SP - 596
EP - 618
JO - Economy and Society
JF - Economy and Society
SN - 0308-5147
IS - 4
ER -