Life-protecting neoliberalism: Hayek and the biopolitics of abortion in Chile

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Life-protecting neoliberalism: Hayek and the biopolitics of abortion in Chile. / Martinez Mateo, Marina.
In: Economy and Society, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2020, p. 596-618.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Martinez Mateo M. Life-protecting neoliberalism: Hayek and the biopolitics of abortion in Chile. Economy and Society. 2020;49(4):596-618. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2020.1789366

Bibtex

@article{b8f1591c7dc74a0798c625ea8e33c9a5,
title = "Life-protecting neoliberalism: Hayek and the biopolitics of abortion in Chile",
abstract = "{\textquoteleft}The law protects the life of those about to be born. The death penalty is only applied in [determined] cases of crimes{\textquoteright}–says the Constitution of Chile, which was developed and implemented by Augusto Pinochet{\textquoteright}s military regime. Why must unborn life be protected while the lives of single persons can be exposed in the death penalty? And why was this regime, famously known for expansive economic liberalization, so concerned with protecting unborn life? These questions are addressed on the basis of two assumptions: (1) Life-protection may become a crucial element of neoliberal functioning; and (2) This protection requires an authoritarian state that acts against living subjects and represses reproductive rights. These assumptions are pursued through an analysis of the discussions on the right to life in the Constituent Commission, taking Hayek{\textquoteright}s theory of the social as a theoretic background. In this way, the constellation in Chile contributes to a deeper understanding of authoritarian neoliberalism in its current forms.",
keywords = "abortion, authoritarian liberalism and neoliberalism, Chile, Foucault, Hayek, right to life, Philosophy",
author = "{Martinez Mateo}, Marina",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1080/03085147.2020.1789366",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "596--618",
journal = "Economy and Society",
issn = "0308-5147",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Life-protecting neoliberalism

T2 - Hayek and the biopolitics of abortion in Chile

AU - Martinez Mateo, Marina

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - ‘The law protects the life of those about to be born. The death penalty is only applied in [determined] cases of crimes’–says the Constitution of Chile, which was developed and implemented by Augusto Pinochet’s military regime. Why must unborn life be protected while the lives of single persons can be exposed in the death penalty? And why was this regime, famously known for expansive economic liberalization, so concerned with protecting unborn life? These questions are addressed on the basis of two assumptions: (1) Life-protection may become a crucial element of neoliberal functioning; and (2) This protection requires an authoritarian state that acts against living subjects and represses reproductive rights. These assumptions are pursued through an analysis of the discussions on the right to life in the Constituent Commission, taking Hayek’s theory of the social as a theoretic background. In this way, the constellation in Chile contributes to a deeper understanding of authoritarian neoliberalism in its current forms.

AB - ‘The law protects the life of those about to be born. The death penalty is only applied in [determined] cases of crimes’–says the Constitution of Chile, which was developed and implemented by Augusto Pinochet’s military regime. Why must unborn life be protected while the lives of single persons can be exposed in the death penalty? And why was this regime, famously known for expansive economic liberalization, so concerned with protecting unborn life? These questions are addressed on the basis of two assumptions: (1) Life-protection may become a crucial element of neoliberal functioning; and (2) This protection requires an authoritarian state that acts against living subjects and represses reproductive rights. These assumptions are pursued through an analysis of the discussions on the right to life in the Constituent Commission, taking Hayek’s theory of the social as a theoretic background. In this way, the constellation in Chile contributes to a deeper understanding of authoritarian neoliberalism in its current forms.

KW - abortion

KW - authoritarian liberalism and neoliberalism

KW - Chile

KW - Foucault

KW - Hayek

KW - right to life

KW - Philosophy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096581598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03085147.2020.1789366

DO - 10.1080/03085147.2020.1789366

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85096581598

VL - 49

SP - 596

EP - 618

JO - Economy and Society

JF - Economy and Society

SN - 0308-5147

IS - 4

ER -

Recently viewed