Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: From forests to rangelands

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: From forests to rangelands. / Dougill, Andrew J.; Stringer, Lindsay C.; Leventon, Julia et al.
In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 367, No. 1606, 19.11.2012, p. 3178-3190.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dougill AJ, Stringer LC, Leventon J, Riddell M, Rueff H, Spracklen DV et al. Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: From forests to rangelands. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012 Nov 19;367(1606):3178-3190. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0418

Bibtex

@article{d022d46aa5474011804519353b2b4b12,
title = "Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: From forests to rangelands",
abstract = "Climate finance investments and international policy are driving new community-based projects incorporating payments for ecosystem services (PES) to simultaneously store carbon and generate livelihood benefits. Most community-based PES (CB-PES) research focuses on forest areas. Rangelands, which store globally significant quantities of carbon and support many of the world's poor, have seen little CB-PES research attention, despite benefitting from several decades of community- based natural resource management (CBNRM) projects. Lessons from CBNRM suggest institutional considerations are vital in underpinning the design and implementation of successful community projects. This study uses documentary analysis to explore the institutional characteristics of three African community-based forest projects that seek to deliver carbon-storage and povertyreduction benefits. Strong existing local institutions, clear land tenure, community control over land management decision-making and up-front, flexible payment schemes are found to be vital. Additionally, we undertake a global review of rangeland CBNRM literature and identify that alongside the lessons learned from forest projects, rangeland CB-PES project design requires specific consideration of project boundaries, benefit distribution, capacity building for community monitoring of carbon storage together with awareness-raising using decision-support tools to display the benefits of carbon-friendly land management. We highlight that institutional analyses must be undertaken alongside improved scientific studies of the carbon cycle to enable links to payment schemes, and for them to contribute to poverty alleviation in rangelands.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, CBNRM, Climate finance, Dryland africa, Institutions, Plan vivo, Voluntary carbon market",
author = "Dougill, {Andrew J.} and Stringer, {Lindsay C.} and Julia Leventon and Mike Riddell and Henri Rueff and Spracklen, {Dominick V.} and Edward Butt",
year = "2012",
month = nov,
day = "19",
doi = "10.1098/rstb.2011.0418",
language = "English",
volume = "367",
pages = "3178--3190",
journal = "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8436",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "1606",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes

T2 - From forests to rangelands

AU - Dougill, Andrew J.

AU - Stringer, Lindsay C.

AU - Leventon, Julia

AU - Riddell, Mike

AU - Rueff, Henri

AU - Spracklen, Dominick V.

AU - Butt, Edward

PY - 2012/11/19

Y1 - 2012/11/19

N2 - Climate finance investments and international policy are driving new community-based projects incorporating payments for ecosystem services (PES) to simultaneously store carbon and generate livelihood benefits. Most community-based PES (CB-PES) research focuses on forest areas. Rangelands, which store globally significant quantities of carbon and support many of the world's poor, have seen little CB-PES research attention, despite benefitting from several decades of community- based natural resource management (CBNRM) projects. Lessons from CBNRM suggest institutional considerations are vital in underpinning the design and implementation of successful community projects. This study uses documentary analysis to explore the institutional characteristics of three African community-based forest projects that seek to deliver carbon-storage and povertyreduction benefits. Strong existing local institutions, clear land tenure, community control over land management decision-making and up-front, flexible payment schemes are found to be vital. Additionally, we undertake a global review of rangeland CBNRM literature and identify that alongside the lessons learned from forest projects, rangeland CB-PES project design requires specific consideration of project boundaries, benefit distribution, capacity building for community monitoring of carbon storage together with awareness-raising using decision-support tools to display the benefits of carbon-friendly land management. We highlight that institutional analyses must be undertaken alongside improved scientific studies of the carbon cycle to enable links to payment schemes, and for them to contribute to poverty alleviation in rangelands.

AB - Climate finance investments and international policy are driving new community-based projects incorporating payments for ecosystem services (PES) to simultaneously store carbon and generate livelihood benefits. Most community-based PES (CB-PES) research focuses on forest areas. Rangelands, which store globally significant quantities of carbon and support many of the world's poor, have seen little CB-PES research attention, despite benefitting from several decades of community- based natural resource management (CBNRM) projects. Lessons from CBNRM suggest institutional considerations are vital in underpinning the design and implementation of successful community projects. This study uses documentary analysis to explore the institutional characteristics of three African community-based forest projects that seek to deliver carbon-storage and povertyreduction benefits. Strong existing local institutions, clear land tenure, community control over land management decision-making and up-front, flexible payment schemes are found to be vital. Additionally, we undertake a global review of rangeland CBNRM literature and identify that alongside the lessons learned from forest projects, rangeland CB-PES project design requires specific consideration of project boundaries, benefit distribution, capacity building for community monitoring of carbon storage together with awareness-raising using decision-support tools to display the benefits of carbon-friendly land management. We highlight that institutional analyses must be undertaken alongside improved scientific studies of the carbon cycle to enable links to payment schemes, and for them to contribute to poverty alleviation in rangelands.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - CBNRM

KW - Climate finance

KW - Dryland africa

KW - Institutions

KW - Plan vivo

KW - Voluntary carbon market

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867172293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/7504f492-d21e-3d2b-9510-1b1288884cac/

U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2011.0418

DO - 10.1098/rstb.2011.0418

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 23045714

AN - SCOPUS:84867172293

VL - 367

SP - 3178

EP - 3190

JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8436

IS - 1606

ER -

DOI