Legal and political arguments on aquatic ecosystem services and hydropower development – A case study on Kemi River basin, Finland

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Legal and political arguments on aquatic ecosystem services and hydropower development – A case study on Kemi River basin, Finland. / Albrecht, Eerika ; Isaac, Roman; Räsänen, Aleksi.
In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 67, 101623, 01.06.2024.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{24a78f20cf3d49639565151a316569e5,
title = "Legal and political arguments on aquatic ecosystem services and hydropower development – A case study on Kemi River basin, Finland",
abstract = "The co-production of ecosystem services (ES) is an intertwined social-ecological process in which natural and anthropogenic contributions together produce a specific ES. Despite multiple studies in which ES trade-offs have been assessed, few empirical studies on arguments for biodiversity and ES exist, in which ES co-production function as a theoretical framework. In this paper, we study the co-production of aquatic ES and analyse political and legal arguments on biodiversity and ES in a long-standing dispute over hydropower and reservoir construction in the Kemi River basin, Finland. Specifically, we investigate what kinds of representations of ES co-production can be identified from stakeholder argumentation and in legal ruling. Our data consists of 26 semi-structured interviews conducted in 2017 and again 2019 to 2020, 144 news articles, and 4 administrative court resolutions. The results show that the arguments used by the stakeholders aim at maintaining the existing hydrological regime and expanding the use of natural resources, establishing river basin management that considers the multiple uses of river, including recreation, or protecting the last untouched stretches of the river and riparian ecosystems. The analysis also reveals that what is considered a valid and effective argument for specific audiences differs for political and legal audiences. The results of this study show that ES co-production concept set emphasis on the diversity of arguments, including the arguments on biodiversity and sociocultural values, which can contribute to governance and management interactions.",
keywords = "Ecosystems Research, Ecosystem services co-production, Aquatic ecosystem services, Arguments, Hydropower, Nature{\textquoteright}s contributions to people, Ecosystem services co-production, Aquatic ecosystem services, Arguments, Hydropower, Nature{\textquoteright}s contributions to people",
author = "Eerika Albrecht and Roman Isaac and Aleksi R{\"a}s{\"a}nen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s)",
year = "2024",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101623",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal and political arguments on aquatic ecosystem services and hydropower development – A case study on Kemi River basin, Finland

AU - Albrecht, Eerika

AU - Isaac, Roman

AU - Räsänen, Aleksi

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)

PY - 2024/6/1

Y1 - 2024/6/1

N2 - The co-production of ecosystem services (ES) is an intertwined social-ecological process in which natural and anthropogenic contributions together produce a specific ES. Despite multiple studies in which ES trade-offs have been assessed, few empirical studies on arguments for biodiversity and ES exist, in which ES co-production function as a theoretical framework. In this paper, we study the co-production of aquatic ES and analyse political and legal arguments on biodiversity and ES in a long-standing dispute over hydropower and reservoir construction in the Kemi River basin, Finland. Specifically, we investigate what kinds of representations of ES co-production can be identified from stakeholder argumentation and in legal ruling. Our data consists of 26 semi-structured interviews conducted in 2017 and again 2019 to 2020, 144 news articles, and 4 administrative court resolutions. The results show that the arguments used by the stakeholders aim at maintaining the existing hydrological regime and expanding the use of natural resources, establishing river basin management that considers the multiple uses of river, including recreation, or protecting the last untouched stretches of the river and riparian ecosystems. The analysis also reveals that what is considered a valid and effective argument for specific audiences differs for political and legal audiences. The results of this study show that ES co-production concept set emphasis on the diversity of arguments, including the arguments on biodiversity and sociocultural values, which can contribute to governance and management interactions.

AB - The co-production of ecosystem services (ES) is an intertwined social-ecological process in which natural and anthropogenic contributions together produce a specific ES. Despite multiple studies in which ES trade-offs have been assessed, few empirical studies on arguments for biodiversity and ES exist, in which ES co-production function as a theoretical framework. In this paper, we study the co-production of aquatic ES and analyse political and legal arguments on biodiversity and ES in a long-standing dispute over hydropower and reservoir construction in the Kemi River basin, Finland. Specifically, we investigate what kinds of representations of ES co-production can be identified from stakeholder argumentation and in legal ruling. Our data consists of 26 semi-structured interviews conducted in 2017 and again 2019 to 2020, 144 news articles, and 4 administrative court resolutions. The results show that the arguments used by the stakeholders aim at maintaining the existing hydrological regime and expanding the use of natural resources, establishing river basin management that considers the multiple uses of river, including recreation, or protecting the last untouched stretches of the river and riparian ecosystems. The analysis also reveals that what is considered a valid and effective argument for specific audiences differs for political and legal audiences. The results of this study show that ES co-production concept set emphasis on the diversity of arguments, including the arguments on biodiversity and sociocultural values, which can contribute to governance and management interactions.

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Ecosystem services co-production

KW - Aquatic ecosystem services

KW - Arguments

KW - Hydropower

KW - Nature’s contributions to people

KW - Ecosystem services co-production

KW - Aquatic ecosystem services

KW - Arguments

KW - Hydropower

KW - Nature’s contributions to people

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190772433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/32d253a7-39aa-3f5e-9f48-f730a289189a/

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101623

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101623

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 67

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

M1 - 101623

ER -