Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - Ecosystem service management

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - Ecosystem service management. / Tscharntke, Teja; Klein, Alexandra-Maria; Kruess, Andreas et al.
In: Ecology Letters, Vol. 8, No. 8, 01.08.2005, p. 857-874.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - Ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters. 2005 Aug 1;8(8):857-874. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x

Bibtex

@article{a5962a1b812648e6bf773afb44d08671,
title = "Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - Ecosystem service management",
abstract = "Understanding the negative and positive effects of agricultural land use for the conservation of biodiversity, and its relation to ecosystem services, needs a landscape perspective. Agriculture can contribute to the conservation of high-diversity systems, which may provide important ecosystem services such as pollination and biological control via complementarity and sampling effects. Land-use management is often focused on few species and local processes, but in dynamic, agricultural landscapes, only a diversity of insurance species may guarantee resilience (the capacity to reorganize after disturbance). Interacting species experience their surrounding landscape at different spatial scales, which influences trophic interactions. Structurally complex landscapes enhance local diversity in agroecosystems, which may compensate for local high-intensity management. Organisms with high-dispersal abilities appear to drive these biodiversity patterns and ecosystem services, because of their recolonization ability and larger resources experienced. Agri-environment schemes (incentives for farmers to benefit the environment) need to broaden their perspective and to take the different responses to schemes in simple (high impact) and complex (low impact) agricultural landscapes into account. In simple landscapes, local allocation of habitat is more important than in complex landscapes, which are in total at risk. However, little knowledge of the relative importance of local and landscape management for biodiversity and its relation to ecosystem services make reliable recommendations difficult.",
keywords = "Biology, Ecosystems Research, agri-environment schemes, Biological control, dispersal, ecosystem fuctioning, land-use systems, pollination, resilience, spatial, sustainability, trophic interactions",
author = "Teja Tscharntke and Alexandra-Maria Klein and Andreas Kruess and Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter and Carsten Thies",
year = "2005",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "857--874",
journal = "Ecology Letters",
issn = "1461-023X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - Ecosystem service management

AU - Tscharntke, Teja

AU - Klein, Alexandra-Maria

AU - Kruess, Andreas

AU - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf

AU - Thies, Carsten

PY - 2005/8/1

Y1 - 2005/8/1

N2 - Understanding the negative and positive effects of agricultural land use for the conservation of biodiversity, and its relation to ecosystem services, needs a landscape perspective. Agriculture can contribute to the conservation of high-diversity systems, which may provide important ecosystem services such as pollination and biological control via complementarity and sampling effects. Land-use management is often focused on few species and local processes, but in dynamic, agricultural landscapes, only a diversity of insurance species may guarantee resilience (the capacity to reorganize after disturbance). Interacting species experience their surrounding landscape at different spatial scales, which influences trophic interactions. Structurally complex landscapes enhance local diversity in agroecosystems, which may compensate for local high-intensity management. Organisms with high-dispersal abilities appear to drive these biodiversity patterns and ecosystem services, because of their recolonization ability and larger resources experienced. Agri-environment schemes (incentives for farmers to benefit the environment) need to broaden their perspective and to take the different responses to schemes in simple (high impact) and complex (low impact) agricultural landscapes into account. In simple landscapes, local allocation of habitat is more important than in complex landscapes, which are in total at risk. However, little knowledge of the relative importance of local and landscape management for biodiversity and its relation to ecosystem services make reliable recommendations difficult.

AB - Understanding the negative and positive effects of agricultural land use for the conservation of biodiversity, and its relation to ecosystem services, needs a landscape perspective. Agriculture can contribute to the conservation of high-diversity systems, which may provide important ecosystem services such as pollination and biological control via complementarity and sampling effects. Land-use management is often focused on few species and local processes, but in dynamic, agricultural landscapes, only a diversity of insurance species may guarantee resilience (the capacity to reorganize after disturbance). Interacting species experience their surrounding landscape at different spatial scales, which influences trophic interactions. Structurally complex landscapes enhance local diversity in agroecosystems, which may compensate for local high-intensity management. Organisms with high-dispersal abilities appear to drive these biodiversity patterns and ecosystem services, because of their recolonization ability and larger resources experienced. Agri-environment schemes (incentives for farmers to benefit the environment) need to broaden their perspective and to take the different responses to schemes in simple (high impact) and complex (low impact) agricultural landscapes into account. In simple landscapes, local allocation of habitat is more important than in complex landscapes, which are in total at risk. However, little knowledge of the relative importance of local and landscape management for biodiversity and its relation to ecosystem services make reliable recommendations difficult.

KW - Biology

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - agri-environment schemes

KW - Biological control

KW - dispersal

KW - ecosystem fuctioning

KW - land-use systems

KW - pollination

KW - resilience

KW - spatial

KW - sustainability

KW - trophic interactions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22544487542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e535147d-6fac-38bb-b121-01f10182a048/

U2 - 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:22544487542

VL - 8

SP - 857

EP - 874

JO - Ecology Letters

JF - Ecology Letters

SN - 1461-023X

IS - 8

ER -