Just another buzzword?: A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science

Cristina I. Apetrei; Guido Caniglia; Henrik von Wehrden; Daniel J. Lang

doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222

Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Standard

Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science. / Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik et al.
In: Global Environmental Change, Vol. 68, 102222, 01.05.2021.

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Bibtex

@article{5413f28acba64e17ad1ae9699999e41f,

title = "Just another buzzword?: A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science",

abstract = "Knowledge is a vital resource for both understanding and addressing pressing social–ecological challenges of our time. Sustainability scientists have thus increasingly turned their attention to the role and relevance of knowledge for societal change. However, as identified in this study, the research landscape is very broad and fragmented, with little convergence on definitions between scholarly communities. We comprehensively map knowledge-related concepts and their uses in sustainability science, while eliciting points of agreement and controversy across bodies of literature. Clarifying terminology is a first step towards better empirical science and theory building, and ultimately enhances our ability to leverage knowledge for action and decision–making. Our analysis also suggests five entry points to thinking about knowledge in sustainability science: (1) knowledge as system; (2) as entity, or (3) as process; (4) knowledge for and through learning; and (5) knowledge at interfaces. We discuss how, taken together, these perspectives can contribute to a better understanding of the multiple ways in which knowledge can serve sustainability.",

keywords = "Action, Knowledge, Sustainability science, Sustainability Science, Transdisciplinary studies",

author = "Apetrei, {Cristina I.} and Guido Caniglia and {von Wehrden}, Henrik and Lang, {Daniel J.}",

year = "2021",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222",

language = "English",

volume = "68",

journal = "Global Environmental Change",

issn = "0959-3780",

publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Just another buzzword?

T2 - A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science

AU - Apetrei, Cristina I.

AU - Caniglia, Guido

AU - von Wehrden, Henrik

AU - Lang, Daniel J.

PY - 2021/5/1

Y1 - 2021/5/1

N2 - Knowledge is a vital resource for both understanding and addressing pressing social–ecological challenges of our time. Sustainability scientists have thus increasingly turned their attention to the role and relevance of knowledge for societal change. However, as identified in this study, the research landscape is very broad and fragmented, with little convergence on definitions between scholarly communities. We comprehensively map knowledge-related concepts and their uses in sustainability science, while eliciting points of agreement and controversy across bodies of literature. Clarifying terminology is a first step towards better empirical science and theory building, and ultimately enhances our ability to leverage knowledge for action and decision–making. Our analysis also suggests five entry points to thinking about knowledge in sustainability science: (1) knowledge as system; (2) as entity, or (3) as process; (4) knowledge for and through learning; and (5) knowledge at interfaces. We discuss how, taken together, these perspectives can contribute to a better understanding of the multiple ways in which knowledge can serve sustainability.

AB - Knowledge is a vital resource for both understanding and addressing pressing social–ecological challenges of our time. Sustainability scientists have thus increasingly turned their attention to the role and relevance of knowledge for societal change. However, as identified in this study, the research landscape is very broad and fragmented, with little convergence on definitions between scholarly communities. We comprehensively map knowledge-related concepts and their uses in sustainability science, while eliciting points of agreement and controversy across bodies of literature. Clarifying terminology is a first step towards better empirical science and theory building, and ultimately enhances our ability to leverage knowledge for action and decision–making. Our analysis also suggests five entry points to thinking about knowledge in sustainability science: (1) knowledge as system; (2) as entity, or (3) as process; (4) knowledge for and through learning; and (5) knowledge at interfaces. We discuss how, taken together, these perspectives can contribute to a better understanding of the multiple ways in which knowledge can serve sustainability.

KW - Action

KW - Knowledge

KW - Sustainability science

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Transdisciplinary studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103617891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/103c43b6-72f5-3f1a-897b-ca76aae7bb93/

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222

DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:85103617891

VL - 68

JO - Global Environmental Change

JF - Global Environmental Change

SN - 0959-3780

M1 - 102222

ER -

Related by journal

Applying the Three Horizons approach in local and regional scenarios to support policy coherence in SDG implementation: Insights from arid Spain

López-Rodríguez, M. D., Jiménez-Aceituno, A., Quintas-Soriano, C., Miguel Requena-Mullor, J., Garau, E., Alba-Patiño, D., Otamendi-Urroz, I., Aguiar, A. P. D., Cortés-Calderón, S. & Castro, A. J., 01.12.2024, In: Global Environmental Change. 89, 16 p., 102922.