Jus ad bellum: Crossing borders to wage war against individuals

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapterpeer-review

Standard

Jus ad bellum: Crossing borders to wage war against individuals. / Tams, Christian J.; Devaney, James G.
Legitimacy and Drones: Investigating the Legality, Morality and Efficacy of UCAVs. ed. / Steven J. Barela. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd., 2016. p. 25-48.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapterpeer-review

Harvard

Tams, CJ & Devaney, JG 2016, Jus ad bellum: Crossing borders to wage war against individuals. in SJ Barela (ed.), Legitimacy and Drones: Investigating the Legality, Morality and Efficacy of UCAVs. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, pp. 25-48. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315592152

APA

Tams, C. J., & Devaney, J. G. (2016). Jus ad bellum: Crossing borders to wage war against individuals. In S. J. Barela (Ed.), Legitimacy and Drones: Investigating the Legality, Morality and Efficacy of UCAVs (pp. 25-48). Taylor and Francis Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315592152

Vancouver

Tams CJ, Devaney JG. Jus ad bellum: Crossing borders to wage war against individuals. In Barela SJ, editor, Legitimacy and Drones: Investigating the Legality, Morality and Efficacy of UCAVs. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2016. p. 25-48 doi: 10.4324/9781315592152

Bibtex

@inbook{15763197e9694fb28223bd290704de86,
title = "Jus ad bellum: Crossing borders to wage war against individuals",
abstract = "Drone strikes have become an everyday reality in the war on terror. Hailed by supporters as an effective and targeted tool, drones require us to rethink questions of legitimate warfare. Legal analysis is part of that inquiry; and one would hope a relevant part. As the debate of the last decade suggests, drone strikes do not neatly fit established patterns of legal argument. In a report issued in 2010, the UN{\textquoteright}s Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary and Arbitrary Executions at the time, Professor Philip Alston, indicated that targeted killing by drones had led to a “highly problematic blurring … of the boundaries of the applicable legal frameworks” the result of which “has been the displacement of clear legal standards with a vaguely defined licence to kill.”",
keywords = "Law",
author = "Tams, {Christian J.} and Devaney, {James G.}",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
day = "9",
doi = "10.4324/9781315592152",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781472446879",
pages = "25--48",
editor = "Barela, {Steven J.}",
booktitle = "Legitimacy and Drones",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Jus ad bellum

T2 - Crossing borders to wage war against individuals

AU - Tams, Christian J.

AU - Devaney, James G.

PY - 2016/3/9

Y1 - 2016/3/9

N2 - Drone strikes have become an everyday reality in the war on terror. Hailed by supporters as an effective and targeted tool, drones require us to rethink questions of legitimate warfare. Legal analysis is part of that inquiry; and one would hope a relevant part. As the debate of the last decade suggests, drone strikes do not neatly fit established patterns of legal argument. In a report issued in 2010, the UN’s Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary and Arbitrary Executions at the time, Professor Philip Alston, indicated that targeted killing by drones had led to a “highly problematic blurring … of the boundaries of the applicable legal frameworks” the result of which “has been the displacement of clear legal standards with a vaguely defined licence to kill.”

AB - Drone strikes have become an everyday reality in the war on terror. Hailed by supporters as an effective and targeted tool, drones require us to rethink questions of legitimate warfare. Legal analysis is part of that inquiry; and one would hope a relevant part. As the debate of the last decade suggests, drone strikes do not neatly fit established patterns of legal argument. In a report issued in 2010, the UN’s Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary and Arbitrary Executions at the time, Professor Philip Alston, indicated that targeted killing by drones had led to a “highly problematic blurring … of the boundaries of the applicable legal frameworks” the result of which “has been the displacement of clear legal standards with a vaguely defined licence to kill.”

KW - Law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062006507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/bd32a4e6-5d77-31fe-bf15-66dfd57a3691/

U2 - 10.4324/9781315592152

DO - 10.4324/9781315592152

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85062006507

SN - 9781472446879

SN - 9781138086937

SP - 25

EP - 48

BT - Legitimacy and Drones

A2 - Barela, Steven J.

PB - Taylor and Francis Ltd.

CY - London

ER -

DOI