Integrating ecosystem services and disservices: insights from plant invasions
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Standard
In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 23, 01.02.2017, p. 94-107.
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrating ecosystem services and disservices
T2 - insights from plant invasions
AU - Vaz, Ana S.
AU - Kueffer, Christoph
AU - Kull, Christian A.
AU - Richardson, David M.
AU - Vicente, Joana R.
AU - Kühn, Ingolf
AU - Schröter, Matthias
AU - Hauck, Jennifer
AU - Bonn, Aletta
AU - Honrado, João P.
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - There is growing interest in ecosystem disservices, i.e. the negative effects of ecosystems on humans. The focus on disservices has been controversial because of the lack of clarity on how to disentangle ecosystem services and disservices related to human wellbeing. A perspective that considers both services and disservices is needed to inform objective decision-making. We propose a comprehensive typology of ecosystem disservices, and present a framework for integrating ecosystem services and disservices for human wellbeing linked to ecosystem functioning. Our treatment is underpinned by three key assumptions: (1) ecosystem attributes and functions are value-free; (2) the perception of benefits or nuisances are however dependent on societal context, and preferences and actions by societal actors may trigger, enhance or alleviate benefits or nuisances derived from ecosystems; and (3) the notion of disservices must account for the role of human management in assessments of ecosystem values, i.e. the social and technological measures that identify, protect, promote or restore desirable levels of services, and concurrently minimise, mitigate or adapt to disservices. We illustrate our ideas with examples from plant invasions as a complex social-ecological phenomenon.
AB - There is growing interest in ecosystem disservices, i.e. the negative effects of ecosystems on humans. The focus on disservices has been controversial because of the lack of clarity on how to disentangle ecosystem services and disservices related to human wellbeing. A perspective that considers both services and disservices is needed to inform objective decision-making. We propose a comprehensive typology of ecosystem disservices, and present a framework for integrating ecosystem services and disservices for human wellbeing linked to ecosystem functioning. Our treatment is underpinned by three key assumptions: (1) ecosystem attributes and functions are value-free; (2) the perception of benefits or nuisances are however dependent on societal context, and preferences and actions by societal actors may trigger, enhance or alleviate benefits or nuisances derived from ecosystems; and (3) the notion of disservices must account for the role of human management in assessments of ecosystem values, i.e. the social and technological measures that identify, protect, promote or restore desirable levels of services, and concurrently minimise, mitigate or adapt to disservices. We illustrate our ideas with examples from plant invasions as a complex social-ecological phenomenon.
KW - Biological invasions
KW - Ecosystem function
KW - Human valuation
KW - Invasive species
KW - Social-ecological management
KW - Ecosystems Research
KW - Environmental planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002542652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.017
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.017
M3 - Scientific review articles
AN - SCOPUS:85002542652
VL - 23
SP - 94
EP - 107
JO - Ecosystem Services
JF - Ecosystem Services
SN - 2212-0416
ER -