Impact of an Acceptance Facilitating Intervention on Patients’ Acceptance of Internet-based Pain Interventions: A randomized controlled trial

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Impact of an Acceptance Facilitating Intervention on Patients’ Acceptance of Internet-based Pain Interventions: A randomized controlled trial. / Baumeister, Harald; Seifferth, Holger; Lin, Jiaxi et al.
In: The Clinical Journal of Pain, Vol. 31, No. 6, 06.2015, p. 528 - 535.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{212f567af6fd49c89d9c273b8c07230b,
title = "Impact of an Acceptance Facilitating Intervention on Patients{\textquoteright} Acceptance of Internet-based Pain Interventions: A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Objective: Results from clinical trials indicate that Internet-based psychological pain interventions are effective in treating chronic pain. However, little is known about patients' acceptance of these programs and how to positively influence patients' intention to engage in them. Therefore, the present study aimed (1) to assess patients' acceptance of Internet-based interventions, and (2) to examine whether patients' acceptance can be increased by an acceptance facilitating intervention. Methods: A total of 104 patients with chronic pain from 2 pain units were randomly allocated to an intervention group (IG) and a no-intervention control group (CG). The IG was shown a short informational video about Internet-based psychological pain interventions before receiving a questionnaire on patients' acceptance of Internet-based psychological pain interventions and predictors of acceptance (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, Internet usage, and Internet anxiety). The CG filled out the questionnaire immediately. Patients' acceptance was measured with a 4-item scale (sum score ranging from 4 to 20). Results: Baseline acceptance of Internet-based interventions was reported as low (sum-score:4-9) by 53.8%, moderate (10 to 15) by 42.3%, and high (16 to 20) by 3.9% of the patients with chronic pain in the CG. The IG showed a significantly higher acceptance (M=12.17, SD=4.22) than the CG (M=8.94, SD=3.71) with a standardized mean difference of d=0.81 (95% CI, 0.41, 1.21). All predictor variables were significantly improved in the IG compared with the CG, except for Internet usage. Conclusions: Patients with chronic pain display a relatively low acceptance of Internet-based psychological pain interventions, which can be substantially increased by a short informational video.",
keywords = "Health sciences, acceptance, e-health, chronic pain, RCT, Psychology, psychological intervention",
author = "Harald Baumeister and Holger Seifferth and Jiaxi Lin and Lisa Nowoczin and Marianne L{\"u}king and Ebert, {David Daniel}",
year = "2015",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1097/AJP.0000000000000118",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "528 -- 535",
journal = "The Clinical Journal of Pain",
issn = "1536-5409",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of an Acceptance Facilitating Intervention on Patients’ Acceptance of Internet-based Pain Interventions

T2 - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Baumeister, Harald

AU - Seifferth, Holger

AU - Lin, Jiaxi

AU - Nowoczin, Lisa

AU - Lüking, Marianne

AU - Ebert, David Daniel

PY - 2015/6

Y1 - 2015/6

N2 - Objective: Results from clinical trials indicate that Internet-based psychological pain interventions are effective in treating chronic pain. However, little is known about patients' acceptance of these programs and how to positively influence patients' intention to engage in them. Therefore, the present study aimed (1) to assess patients' acceptance of Internet-based interventions, and (2) to examine whether patients' acceptance can be increased by an acceptance facilitating intervention. Methods: A total of 104 patients with chronic pain from 2 pain units were randomly allocated to an intervention group (IG) and a no-intervention control group (CG). The IG was shown a short informational video about Internet-based psychological pain interventions before receiving a questionnaire on patients' acceptance of Internet-based psychological pain interventions and predictors of acceptance (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, Internet usage, and Internet anxiety). The CG filled out the questionnaire immediately. Patients' acceptance was measured with a 4-item scale (sum score ranging from 4 to 20). Results: Baseline acceptance of Internet-based interventions was reported as low (sum-score:4-9) by 53.8%, moderate (10 to 15) by 42.3%, and high (16 to 20) by 3.9% of the patients with chronic pain in the CG. The IG showed a significantly higher acceptance (M=12.17, SD=4.22) than the CG (M=8.94, SD=3.71) with a standardized mean difference of d=0.81 (95% CI, 0.41, 1.21). All predictor variables were significantly improved in the IG compared with the CG, except for Internet usage. Conclusions: Patients with chronic pain display a relatively low acceptance of Internet-based psychological pain interventions, which can be substantially increased by a short informational video.

AB - Objective: Results from clinical trials indicate that Internet-based psychological pain interventions are effective in treating chronic pain. However, little is known about patients' acceptance of these programs and how to positively influence patients' intention to engage in them. Therefore, the present study aimed (1) to assess patients' acceptance of Internet-based interventions, and (2) to examine whether patients' acceptance can be increased by an acceptance facilitating intervention. Methods: A total of 104 patients with chronic pain from 2 pain units were randomly allocated to an intervention group (IG) and a no-intervention control group (CG). The IG was shown a short informational video about Internet-based psychological pain interventions before receiving a questionnaire on patients' acceptance of Internet-based psychological pain interventions and predictors of acceptance (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, Internet usage, and Internet anxiety). The CG filled out the questionnaire immediately. Patients' acceptance was measured with a 4-item scale (sum score ranging from 4 to 20). Results: Baseline acceptance of Internet-based interventions was reported as low (sum-score:4-9) by 53.8%, moderate (10 to 15) by 42.3%, and high (16 to 20) by 3.9% of the patients with chronic pain in the CG. The IG showed a significantly higher acceptance (M=12.17, SD=4.22) than the CG (M=8.94, SD=3.71) with a standardized mean difference of d=0.81 (95% CI, 0.41, 1.21). All predictor variables were significantly improved in the IG compared with the CG, except for Internet usage. Conclusions: Patients with chronic pain display a relatively low acceptance of Internet-based psychological pain interventions, which can be substantially increased by a short informational video.

KW - Health sciences

KW - acceptance

KW - e-health

KW - chronic pain

KW - RCT

KW - Psychology

KW - psychological intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929518637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000118

DO - 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000118

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 24866854

VL - 31

SP - 528

EP - 535

JO - The Clinical Journal of Pain

JF - The Clinical Journal of Pain

SN - 1536-5409

IS - 6

ER -