"I don't know anything about soccer" how personalweaknesses and strengths guide inferences aboutwomen's qualification in sex-typed jobs
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Swiss Journal of Psychology, Vol. 70, No. 3, 09.2011, p. 149-154.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - "I don't know anything about soccer" how personalweaknesses and strengths guide inferences aboutwomen's qualification in sex-typed jobs
AU - Reinhard, Marc André
AU - Schindler, Simon
AU - Stahlberg, Dagmar
AU - Messner, Matthias
AU - Mucha, Nadine
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - A great deal of research has been dedicated to the difficulties women face in business management domains because they lack the required "masculinity" in terms of masculine skills and traits. Previous work has shown that when males are judged, failures in typical feminine tasks can signal high masculinity and can therefore become an asset in terms of attributed occupational success in a typical masculine job (i.e., manager position). However, jobs at lower levels of organizational hierarchies differ in their trait requirements, with some jobs requiring mostly typical feminine traits and others mostly typical masculine traits. The present study therefore tested and found support for the hypothesis that personal weaknesses and strengths in a feminine or masculine domain guide recruiters' inferences about a candidate's gender prototypicality. These inferences, in turn, predict job-suitability ratings for sex-typed jobs. It is shown that for women, too, stating weaknesses can sometimes be more advantageous than stating strengths.
AB - A great deal of research has been dedicated to the difficulties women face in business management domains because they lack the required "masculinity" in terms of masculine skills and traits. Previous work has shown that when males are judged, failures in typical feminine tasks can signal high masculinity and can therefore become an asset in terms of attributed occupational success in a typical masculine job (i.e., manager position). However, jobs at lower levels of organizational hierarchies differ in their trait requirements, with some jobs requiring mostly typical feminine traits and others mostly typical masculine traits. The present study therefore tested and found support for the hypothesis that personal weaknesses and strengths in a feminine or masculine domain guide recruiters' inferences about a candidate's gender prototypicality. These inferences, in turn, predict job-suitability ratings for sex-typed jobs. It is shown that for women, too, stating weaknesses can sometimes be more advantageous than stating strengths.
KW - Gender typicality
KW - Job suitability
KW - Personal weaknesses and strengths
KW - Sex-typed jobs
KW - Stereotypes
KW - Psychology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855653606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1024/1421-0185/a000050
DO - 10.1024/1421-0185/a000050
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:84855653606
VL - 70
SP - 149
EP - 154
JO - Swiss Journal of Psychology
JF - Swiss Journal of Psychology
SN - 1421-0185
IS - 3
ER -