Human-carnivore coexistence in a traditional rural landscape

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Human-carnivore coexistence in a traditional rural landscape. / Dorresteijn, Ine; Hanspach, Jan; Kecskés, Attila et al.

In: Landscape Ecology, Vol. 29, No. 7, 08.2014, p. 1145-1155.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dorresteijn I, Hanspach J, Kecskés A, Latková H, Mezey Z, Sugár S et al. Human-carnivore coexistence in a traditional rural landscape. Landscape Ecology. 2014 Aug;29(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0048-5

Bibtex

@article{2f3b38827e6549d9b23a771461401fb0,
title = "Human-carnivore coexistence in a traditional rural landscape",
abstract = "Facilitating human-carnivore coexistence is a major conservation concern in human-dominated landscapes worldwide. Useful insights could be gained by studying and understanding the dynamics of human-carnivore coexistence in landscapes in which carnivores and humans have coexisted for a long time. We used a two-pronged approach combining ecological and social data to study coexistence of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) and humans in Transylvania, Romania. First, we surveyed 554 km of walking transects to estimate activity via a bear sign index, namely the proportion of anthills disturbed by bears, and used spatially explicit predictive models to test which biophysical and anthropogenic variables influenced bear activity. Second, we interviewed 86 shepherds and 359 villagers and community representatives to assess conflicts with bears and attitudes of shepherds towards bears. Our interdisciplinary study showed that bears and humans coexisted relatively peacefully despite occasional conflicts. Coexistence appeared to be facilitated by: (1) the availability of large forest blocks that are connected to the source population of bears in the Carpathian Mountains; (2) the use of traditional livestock management to minimize damage from bears; and (3) some tolerance among shepherds to occasional conflict with bears. In contrast, bear activity was unrelated to human settlements, and compensation for livestock losses did not influence people's attitudes toward bears. Our study shows that coexistence of humans and carnivores is possible, even without direct economic incentives. A key challenge for settings with a discontinuous history of human-carnivore coexistence is to reinstate both practices and attitudes that facilitate coexistence.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Carnivore conservation, Eastern Europe, Human-carnivore coexistence, Human-dominated landscapes, Ursus arctos, Wildlife conflicts",
author = "Ine Dorresteijn and Jan Hanspach and Attila Kecsk{\'e}s and Hana Latkov{\'a} and Zs{\'o}fia Mezey and Szil{\'a}rd Sug{\'a}r and {von Wehrden}, Henrik and Joern Fischer",
year = "2014",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1007/s10980-014-0048-5",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1145--1155",
journal = "Landscape Ecology",
issn = "0921-2973",
publisher = "SPB Academic Publishing",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human-carnivore coexistence in a traditional rural landscape

AU - Dorresteijn, Ine

AU - Hanspach, Jan

AU - Kecskés, Attila

AU - Latková, Hana

AU - Mezey, Zsófia

AU - Sugár, Szilárd

AU - von Wehrden, Henrik

AU - Fischer, Joern

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - Facilitating human-carnivore coexistence is a major conservation concern in human-dominated landscapes worldwide. Useful insights could be gained by studying and understanding the dynamics of human-carnivore coexistence in landscapes in which carnivores and humans have coexisted for a long time. We used a two-pronged approach combining ecological and social data to study coexistence of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) and humans in Transylvania, Romania. First, we surveyed 554 km of walking transects to estimate activity via a bear sign index, namely the proportion of anthills disturbed by bears, and used spatially explicit predictive models to test which biophysical and anthropogenic variables influenced bear activity. Second, we interviewed 86 shepherds and 359 villagers and community representatives to assess conflicts with bears and attitudes of shepherds towards bears. Our interdisciplinary study showed that bears and humans coexisted relatively peacefully despite occasional conflicts. Coexistence appeared to be facilitated by: (1) the availability of large forest blocks that are connected to the source population of bears in the Carpathian Mountains; (2) the use of traditional livestock management to minimize damage from bears; and (3) some tolerance among shepherds to occasional conflict with bears. In contrast, bear activity was unrelated to human settlements, and compensation for livestock losses did not influence people's attitudes toward bears. Our study shows that coexistence of humans and carnivores is possible, even without direct economic incentives. A key challenge for settings with a discontinuous history of human-carnivore coexistence is to reinstate both practices and attitudes that facilitate coexistence.

AB - Facilitating human-carnivore coexistence is a major conservation concern in human-dominated landscapes worldwide. Useful insights could be gained by studying and understanding the dynamics of human-carnivore coexistence in landscapes in which carnivores and humans have coexisted for a long time. We used a two-pronged approach combining ecological and social data to study coexistence of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) and humans in Transylvania, Romania. First, we surveyed 554 km of walking transects to estimate activity via a bear sign index, namely the proportion of anthills disturbed by bears, and used spatially explicit predictive models to test which biophysical and anthropogenic variables influenced bear activity. Second, we interviewed 86 shepherds and 359 villagers and community representatives to assess conflicts with bears and attitudes of shepherds towards bears. Our interdisciplinary study showed that bears and humans coexisted relatively peacefully despite occasional conflicts. Coexistence appeared to be facilitated by: (1) the availability of large forest blocks that are connected to the source population of bears in the Carpathian Mountains; (2) the use of traditional livestock management to minimize damage from bears; and (3) some tolerance among shepherds to occasional conflict with bears. In contrast, bear activity was unrelated to human settlements, and compensation for livestock losses did not influence people's attitudes toward bears. Our study shows that coexistence of humans and carnivores is possible, even without direct economic incentives. A key challenge for settings with a discontinuous history of human-carnivore coexistence is to reinstate both practices and attitudes that facilitate coexistence.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Carnivore conservation

KW - Eastern Europe

KW - Human-carnivore coexistence

KW - Human-dominated landscapes

KW - Ursus arctos

KW - Wildlife conflicts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904987822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10980-014-0048-5

DO - 10.1007/s10980-014-0048-5

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84904987822

VL - 29

SP - 1145

EP - 1155

JO - Landscape Ecology

JF - Landscape Ecology

SN - 0921-2973

IS - 7

ER -