How to estimate carabid biomass?—an evaluation of size-weight models for ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and perspectives for further improvement

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

How to estimate carabid biomass?—an evaluation of size-weight models for ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and perspectives for further improvement. / Weiss, Fabio; Linde, Andreas.
In: Journal of Insect Conservation, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.08.2022, p. 537-548.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ef7d2c8b55564c509d33a35bf50daae3,
title = "How to estimate carabid biomass?—an evaluation of size-weight models for ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and perspectives for further improvement",
abstract = "Biomass is an important metric for monitoring carabid populations and serves as an ecological indicator. Models that predict carabid weight based on body size represent a simple and straightforward method to estimate biomass and are therefore commonly used. However, such models are rarely evaluated against independent validation data. In this study, we evaluated the two widely used size-weight models by Szyszko (1983) and Booij et al. (1994) drawing on previously published independent data. Additionally, we developed and tested four new models to also evaluate the potential effect of taxonomic parameters; and compared model predictions with actual measurements of biomass using relative deviation graphs and observed versus predicted from regression. We show that the two models by Szyszko (1983) and Booij et al. (1994) contain systematic bias towards larger and smaller carabids, respectively, suggesting restricted applicability of such models. Additional taxonomic parameters improved weight predictions, indicating one possible solution to the issue of restricted applicability. We discuss further relevant limitations of size-weight models and their application and recommend a combined use of the models of Szyszko (1983) and Booij et al. (1994) for carabids ≥ 11.8 mm and < 11.8 mm, respectively. Implications for insect conservation: Size-weight models are a suitable and simple method to estimate the biomass of carabids and have great potential to be used in monitoring schemes, the investigation of long-term trends and ecological studies. It is, however, essential that researchers pay special attention to potential restrictions in their applicability and methodological limitations.",
keywords = "Ecological modelling, Insect biomass, Insect decline, Insect monitoring, Model validation, Size weight equation, Biology",
author = "Fabio Weiss and Andreas Linde",
note = "This research was funded through the Biosphere Reserves Institute and the Innovation and Career Center “ProBio-LaB” by the Ministry of Science, Research and Culture of the federal state of Brandenburg (MWFK). ",
year = "2022",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10841-022-00391-6",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "537--548",
journal = "Journal of Insect Conservation",
issn = "1366-638X",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to estimate carabid biomass?—an evaluation of size-weight models for ground beetles (Coleoptera

T2 - Carabidae) and perspectives for further improvement

AU - Weiss, Fabio

AU - Linde, Andreas

N1 - This research was funded through the Biosphere Reserves Institute and the Innovation and Career Center “ProBio-LaB” by the Ministry of Science, Research and Culture of the federal state of Brandenburg (MWFK).

PY - 2022/8/1

Y1 - 2022/8/1

N2 - Biomass is an important metric for monitoring carabid populations and serves as an ecological indicator. Models that predict carabid weight based on body size represent a simple and straightforward method to estimate biomass and are therefore commonly used. However, such models are rarely evaluated against independent validation data. In this study, we evaluated the two widely used size-weight models by Szyszko (1983) and Booij et al. (1994) drawing on previously published independent data. Additionally, we developed and tested four new models to also evaluate the potential effect of taxonomic parameters; and compared model predictions with actual measurements of biomass using relative deviation graphs and observed versus predicted from regression. We show that the two models by Szyszko (1983) and Booij et al. (1994) contain systematic bias towards larger and smaller carabids, respectively, suggesting restricted applicability of such models. Additional taxonomic parameters improved weight predictions, indicating one possible solution to the issue of restricted applicability. We discuss further relevant limitations of size-weight models and their application and recommend a combined use of the models of Szyszko (1983) and Booij et al. (1994) for carabids ≥ 11.8 mm and < 11.8 mm, respectively. Implications for insect conservation: Size-weight models are a suitable and simple method to estimate the biomass of carabids and have great potential to be used in monitoring schemes, the investigation of long-term trends and ecological studies. It is, however, essential that researchers pay special attention to potential restrictions in their applicability and methodological limitations.

AB - Biomass is an important metric for monitoring carabid populations and serves as an ecological indicator. Models that predict carabid weight based on body size represent a simple and straightforward method to estimate biomass and are therefore commonly used. However, such models are rarely evaluated against independent validation data. In this study, we evaluated the two widely used size-weight models by Szyszko (1983) and Booij et al. (1994) drawing on previously published independent data. Additionally, we developed and tested four new models to also evaluate the potential effect of taxonomic parameters; and compared model predictions with actual measurements of biomass using relative deviation graphs and observed versus predicted from regression. We show that the two models by Szyszko (1983) and Booij et al. (1994) contain systematic bias towards larger and smaller carabids, respectively, suggesting restricted applicability of such models. Additional taxonomic parameters improved weight predictions, indicating one possible solution to the issue of restricted applicability. We discuss further relevant limitations of size-weight models and their application and recommend a combined use of the models of Szyszko (1983) and Booij et al. (1994) for carabids ≥ 11.8 mm and < 11.8 mm, respectively. Implications for insect conservation: Size-weight models are a suitable and simple method to estimate the biomass of carabids and have great potential to be used in monitoring schemes, the investigation of long-term trends and ecological studies. It is, however, essential that researchers pay special attention to potential restrictions in their applicability and methodological limitations.

KW - Ecological modelling

KW - Insect biomass

KW - Insect decline

KW - Insect monitoring

KW - Model validation

KW - Size weight equation

KW - Biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128164048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/42cd1e95-d3ac-3cb0-821e-2bcf6df1b3dc/

U2 - 10.1007/s10841-022-00391-6

DO - 10.1007/s10841-022-00391-6

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85128164048

VL - 26

SP - 537

EP - 548

JO - Journal of Insect Conservation

JF - Journal of Insect Conservation

SN - 1366-638X

IS - 4

ER -

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Horst Kowalewski

Publications

  1. Wende zur Nachhaltigkeit
  2. What lures cross-border venture capital inflows?
  3. Worldwide distribution of Persistent Organic Pollutants in air, including results of air monitoring by passive air sampling in five continents
  4. Neue deutsche Härte
  5. Epilog - Und wo sind wir?
  6. Between political protest and tourism gentrification
  7. Physical Attractiveness, Employment, and Wages
  8. Materialities of the Performative
  9. Aerobic Biodegradability of the Calcium Channel Antagonist Verapamil and Identification of a Microbial Dead-End Transformation Product Studied by LC-MS/MS
  10. Sources of Individual Differences in L2 Narrative Production
  11. Regionale Unterschiede der Netznutzungsentgelte
  12. Is there monopsonistic discrimination against immigrants?
  13. Catalysing Change in Higher Education for Sustainable Development
  14. Coplanar micro-strips/electrospun sensor system to measure the electronics properties of the polyethylene oxide (PEO) electrospun
  15. Großprojektmanagement
  16. Appreciation of multilingual teaching activities by secondary school students in Germany: findings from a quasi-experimental intervention study on teaching French
  17. Die Camera Obscura der Identität
  18. Overcoming the crisis
  19. Einleitung
  20. Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression
  21. "Do Green Parties matter"
  22. Die "Sustainable University" als informeller Lernkontext
  23. Commodity Studies with Polanyi
  24. How to estimate carabid biomass?—an evaluation of size-weight models for ground beetles (Coleoptera
  25. Studying Organizational Creativity as Process