How much can we learn about voluntary climate action from behavior in public goods games?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Evidence from public goods game experiments holds the promise of informing climate change policies. To fulfill this promise, such evidence needs to demonstrate generalizability to this specific policy context. This paper examines whether and under which conditions behavior in public goods games generalizes to decisions about voluntary climate actions. We observe each participant in two different decision tasks: a real giving task in which contributions are used to directly reduce CO2 emissions and an abstract public goods game. Through treatment variations in this within-subjects design, we explore two factors that are candidates for affecting generalizability: the structural resemblance of contribution incentives between the tasks and the role of the subject pool, students and non-students. Our findings suggest that cooperation in public goods games is only weakly linked to voluntary climate actions and not in a uniform way. For a standard set of parameters, behavior in both tasks is uncorrelated. Greater structural resemblance of the public goods game with the context of climate change mitigation produces more sizable correlations, especially for student subjects.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106591
JournalEcological Economics
Volume171
Number of pages13
ISSN0921-8009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 05.2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under grant 01UV1012. Furthermore, we would like to thank the audiences at ESA New York, ESA Cologne, AURÖ Bern, ZEW Mannheim, WCERE Istanbul, and the IfW Kiel for their valuable comments.

Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under grant 01UV1012 . Furthermore, we would like to thank the audiences at ESA New York, ESA Cologne, AURÖ Bern, ZEW Mannheim, WCERE Istanbul, and the IfW Kiel for their valuable comments.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.

    Research areas

  • Climate change mitigation, Generalizability, Lab experiments, Public goods game, Voluntary cooperation
  • Economics

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Energy-aware system design for autonomous wireless sensor nodes
  2. Foundation of digital badges and micro-credentials
  3. Structure and Organization of Product Development Projects
  4. Development of environmental fate models for engineered nanoparticles--a case study of TiO2 nanoparticles in the Rhine River
  5. Manufacturing, control, and performance evaluation of a Gecko-inspired soft robot
  6. Shared mobility business models
  7. Embodiment of Science in Science Slams.
  8. EU decision-making in asylum policy
  9. From 'one right way' to 'one ruinous way'? Discursive shifts in 'There is no alternative'
  10. Gas-Kampf oder Gas-Krampf
  11. Next generation wireless energy aware sensors for internet of things
  12. Integrated curvature sensing of soft bending actuators using inertial measurement units
  13. Connected Text Reading and Differences in Text Reading Fluency in Adult Readers
  14. Patterns of International Organization
  15. Powers of Abstraction
  16. Influence of clouds on the photochemical degradation in aqueous phase - II
  17. Forecasting Government Bond Yields with Neural Networks Considering Cointegration
  18. No need for new natural gas pipelines and LNG terminalsin Europe
  19. Implementing inquiry-based science education to foster emotional engagement of special-needs students
  20. Learning with summaries
  21. Diffusion of tax policies in the European Union
  22. Income inequality, status decline and support for the radical right
  23. Klimapaket
  24. Temporary organizing and acceleration
  25. IGH
  26. Das fossile Imperium schlägt zurück
  27. Discovering cooperation
  28. Ice clamping system in manufacturing systems as a cyber-physical system towards Industry 4.0
  29. Using the learner-generated drawing strategy
  30. Utilising learning analytics for study success
  31. “Happy, happy, happy …”
  32. Gewalt oder Macht
  33. A Note on Smoking Behavior and Health Risk Taking
  34. Implementing the No Harm Principle in International Economic Law
  35. Using the Internet for Alcohol and Drug Prevention
  36. Green sample preparation focusing on organic analytes in complex matrices
  37. The Boundary Objects Concept: Theorizing Film and Media.
  38. Generative Bildarbeit