How Differences in Ratings of Odors and Odor Labels Are Associated with Identification Mechanisms

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Kathrin Kaeppler

Introduction: Odor perception is biased by verbal–semantic processes when cues on an odor’s source are readily available from the context. At the same time, olfaction has been characterized as basically sensation driven when this information is absent. In the present study, we examined whether language effects occur when verbal cues are absent and how expectations about an odor’s identity shape odor evaluations. Methods: A total of 56 subjects were asked to rate 20 unlabeled odor samples on perceptual dimensions as well as quality attributes and to eventually provide an odor source name. In a subsequent session, they performed the same rating tasks on a set of written odor labels that was compiled individually for each participant. It included both the 20 correct odor names (true labels) and in any case of incorrect odor naming in the first session, the self–generated labels (identified labels). Results: We compared odor ratings to ratings of both types of labels to test whether differences between odor and odor label evaluations were rooted in identification mechanisms. In cases of false identifications, we found higher consistencies between the evaluation of an odor and its identified label than between the description of an odor and its true (yet not associated) label. Conclusions: These results indicate that odor evaluations are strongly affected by the mental image of an odor rather than the actual sensory codes and that this mental image is built spontaneously. Our findings imply that odors and odor labels are evaluated similarly for identical objects and that the differences found in similar studies may have been rooted in different mental representations being evaluated. Implications: Odor sensations provoke odor naming without explicit demand. These self–generated hypotheses about an odor’s source exert a considerable semantic impact on odor perceptual processing, regardless of their accuracy.

Original languageEnglish
JournalChemosensory Perception
Volume12
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)18-31
Number of pages14
ISSN1936-5802
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15.04.2019

    Research areas

  • Language, Odor evaluation, Odor identification, Olfaction, Perceptual processing, Semantic processing
  • Business psychology

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Exploring the processes of emergent leadership in a netball team
  2. Determination of the construction and the material identity values of outside building components with the help of in-situ measuring procedures and FEM-simulation calculations
  3. Sliding Mode Control for a Vertical Dynamics in the Presence of Nonlinear Friction
  4. archiDART: an R package for the automated computation of plant root architectural traits
  5. Evaluating A Teaching-Learning Sequence (TLS) About Acid-Base Reactions In Upper Secondary School
  6. Energy-aware system design for autonomous wireless sensor nodes
  7. Scientific and local ecological knowledge, shaping perceptions towards protected areas and related ecosystem services
  8. Fulfillment of Heterogeneous Customer Delivery Times through Decoupling the Production and Accelerating Production Orders
  9. Using an adaptive memory strategy to improve a multistart heuristic for sequencing by hybridization
  10. Manufacturing of irregular shapes through force control in incremental sheet forming with active medium
  11. The Effect of Implicit Moral Attitudes on Managerial Decision-Making
  12. Plant traits alone are poor predictors of ecosystem properties and long-term ecosystem functioning
  13. The role of plant biodiversity in modifying the structure and functioning of higher tropic Levels in species-rich forests
  14. A Systematic Literature Review Of Machine Learning Approaches For The Prediction Of Delivery Dates
  15. Pathways and mechanisms for catalyzing social impact through Orchestration: Insights from an open social innovation project
  16. Steering of land use in the context of sustainable development
  17. Learning from Safe-by-Design for Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design
  18. The emergence of selection rules and their encounter with group theory, 1913-1927
  19. Organizational Practices for the Aging Workforce
  20. Recognizing Guarantees and Assurances of Non-Repetition
  21. Tree-tree interactions and crown complementarity
  22. Crop rotation modelling
  23. The Use of Anti-Windup Techniques in Didactic Level Systems
  24. Analysis of life cycle datasets for the material gold
  25. Degrees of Integration
  26. Design of a Real Time Path of Motion Control for Manufacturing Applications
  27. Plural valuation in space: mapping values of grasslands and their ecosystem services
  28. Studying embodied encounters
  29. Wer wird subventioniert?
  30. Comparison of Panel Cointegration Tests
  31. Relativity in Social Cognition: Basic processes and novel applications of social comparisons
  32. A panel cointegrating rank test with structural breaks and cross-sectional dependence
  33. Levels of indicator development for education for sustainable development
  34. Co-EM Support Vector learning
  35. Smart cities, smart borders. Sensing networks and security in the urban space
  36. Scaffolding im Rahmen von Inquiry-based Learning.
  37. Managing and accounting for corporate biodiversity contributions mapping the field
  38. Factors shaping European rabbit abundance in continuous and fragmented populations of central Spain
  39. BBS futur 2.0
  40. Towards a Relational Materialism
  41. Farmers’ perceptions and knowledge of natural enemies as providers of biological control in cider apple orchards
  42. Georeferencing System for Maneuvering of Autonomous Truck in Mining Environment
  43. An Adaptive Lyapunovs Internal PID Regulator in Automotive Applications
  44. Index und Irritation