Heat and light: Understanding bioenergy siting controversy
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review
Standard
Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation. ed. / Patrick Devine-Wright. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2013. p. 289-300.
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Heat and light
T2 - Understanding bioenergy siting controversy
AU - Upham, Paul
PY - 2013/1/1
Y1 - 2013/1/1
N2 - This chapter draws together some of the insights from an interdisciplinaryresearch programme that has investigated public and stakeholder attitudes to thecultivation and use of biomass for energy in the UK. The key empirical focus hereis a bioenergy siting controversy involving a nationally significant advancedbioenergy gasifier, which serves to illustrate the very real tensions betweennational level energy targets and local expectations of democratic decision-making. While suggestions are made for mitigating these tensions, they areunlikely to be fully resolved, given the pressure of energy and climate changetargets (BERR, 2008a). The chapter suggests that the politics and psychology ofobjection, particularly place attachment, are interconnected. Attitudes are in partcontingent on their context: if national energy and climate targets are to be met,rural and coastal communities will need to be convinced that additional energyinfrastructure is part of a serious national and international drive to mitigateclimate change and that they are not being asked to unilaterally accept changes tothe local environment without others also playing their part in emissions reduc-tion
AB - This chapter draws together some of the insights from an interdisciplinaryresearch programme that has investigated public and stakeholder attitudes to thecultivation and use of biomass for energy in the UK. The key empirical focus hereis a bioenergy siting controversy involving a nationally significant advancedbioenergy gasifier, which serves to illustrate the very real tensions betweennational level energy targets and local expectations of democratic decision-making. While suggestions are made for mitigating these tensions, they areunlikely to be fully resolved, given the pressure of energy and climate changetargets (BERR, 2008a). The chapter suggests that the politics and psychology ofobjection, particularly place attachment, are interconnected. Attitudes are in partcontingent on their context: if national energy and climate targets are to be met,rural and coastal communities will need to be convinced that additional energyinfrastructure is part of a serious national and international drive to mitigateclimate change and that they are not being asked to unilaterally accept changes tothe local environment without others also playing their part in emissions reduc-tion
KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920997595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4324/9781849776707
DO - 10.4324/9781849776707
M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies
AN - SCOPUS:84920997595
SN - 9781844078639
SP - 289
EP - 300
BT - Renewable Energy and the Public
A2 - Devine-Wright, Patrick
PB - Routledge Taylor & Francis Group
ER -