Governing anthropogenic assets for nature’s contributions to people in forests: a policy document analysis

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Governing anthropogenic assets for nature’s contributions to people in forests: a policy document analysis. / Isaac, Roman; Hofmann, Johanna; Koegst, Jana et al.
In: Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 152, 103657, 01.02.2024.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Isaac R, Hofmann J, Koegst J, Schleyer C, Martín-López B. Governing anthropogenic assets for nature’s contributions to people in forests: a policy document analysis. Environmental Science & Policy. 2024 Feb 1;152:103657. Epub 2023 Dec 21. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103657

Bibtex

@article{35096a0e67904bc2b652dff2416b4602,
title = "Governing anthropogenic assets for nature{\textquoteright}s contributions to people in forests: a policy document analysis",
abstract = "Forests support human wellbeing by providing multiple nature{\textquoteright}s contributions to people (NCP). These are derived from an interplay of both natural and anthropogenic assets, which is a process known as NCP co-production. Like forests and NCP, anthropogenic assets are subject to modes of governance operating across multiple levels, in which policies are a central tool for executing formal governance. Here, we conduct a policy document analysis to investigate how policies refer to both the anthropogenic assets involved in NCP co-production and the modes of governance affecting these, i.e., hierarchical, scientific-technical, (adaptive)-collaborative governance, and the governing of strategic behaviour. The policy document analysis focuses on forestry and biodiversity conservation policies spanning across multiple governance levels, from the local level – two Biosphere Reserves and one National Park in Germany – to the supra-national level of the European Union. We find that policies predominantly address material and regulating NCP and refer to hierarchical and scientific-technical governance. Based on a redundancy analysis, we identify six archetypes of governance of NCP and the anthropogenic assets underpinning their co-production: (1) the governing of strategic behaviour for regulating NCP, (2) governing habitat management for experiences in nature, (3) governing habitat management for pest control, (4) collaborative governance for timber, (5) local governance for experiences in nature, and (6) promoting knowledge for habitat protection. Our analysis thereby unveils how policies intend to govern anthropogenic capitals related to the co-production of specific forest NCP. The findings, including the six archetypes, can support policymakers in designing policies across governance levels.",
keywords = "Archetypes, Institutions, Anthropogenic assets, Coproduction, Ecosystem services, Multi-level governance, Ecosystems Research, Biology",
author = "Roman Isaac and Johanna Hofmann and Jana Koegst and Christian Schleyer and Berta Mart{\'i}n-L{\'o}pez",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 Elsevier Ltd",
year = "2024",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103657",
language = "English",
volume = "152",
journal = "Environmental Science & Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governing anthropogenic assets for nature’s contributions to people in forests

T2 - a policy document analysis

AU - Isaac, Roman

AU - Hofmann, Johanna

AU - Koegst, Jana

AU - Schleyer, Christian

AU - Martín-López, Berta

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2024/2/1

Y1 - 2024/2/1

N2 - Forests support human wellbeing by providing multiple nature’s contributions to people (NCP). These are derived from an interplay of both natural and anthropogenic assets, which is a process known as NCP co-production. Like forests and NCP, anthropogenic assets are subject to modes of governance operating across multiple levels, in which policies are a central tool for executing formal governance. Here, we conduct a policy document analysis to investigate how policies refer to both the anthropogenic assets involved in NCP co-production and the modes of governance affecting these, i.e., hierarchical, scientific-technical, (adaptive)-collaborative governance, and the governing of strategic behaviour. The policy document analysis focuses on forestry and biodiversity conservation policies spanning across multiple governance levels, from the local level – two Biosphere Reserves and one National Park in Germany – to the supra-national level of the European Union. We find that policies predominantly address material and regulating NCP and refer to hierarchical and scientific-technical governance. Based on a redundancy analysis, we identify six archetypes of governance of NCP and the anthropogenic assets underpinning their co-production: (1) the governing of strategic behaviour for regulating NCP, (2) governing habitat management for experiences in nature, (3) governing habitat management for pest control, (4) collaborative governance for timber, (5) local governance for experiences in nature, and (6) promoting knowledge for habitat protection. Our analysis thereby unveils how policies intend to govern anthropogenic capitals related to the co-production of specific forest NCP. The findings, including the six archetypes, can support policymakers in designing policies across governance levels.

AB - Forests support human wellbeing by providing multiple nature’s contributions to people (NCP). These are derived from an interplay of both natural and anthropogenic assets, which is a process known as NCP co-production. Like forests and NCP, anthropogenic assets are subject to modes of governance operating across multiple levels, in which policies are a central tool for executing formal governance. Here, we conduct a policy document analysis to investigate how policies refer to both the anthropogenic assets involved in NCP co-production and the modes of governance affecting these, i.e., hierarchical, scientific-technical, (adaptive)-collaborative governance, and the governing of strategic behaviour. The policy document analysis focuses on forestry and biodiversity conservation policies spanning across multiple governance levels, from the local level – two Biosphere Reserves and one National Park in Germany – to the supra-national level of the European Union. We find that policies predominantly address material and regulating NCP and refer to hierarchical and scientific-technical governance. Based on a redundancy analysis, we identify six archetypes of governance of NCP and the anthropogenic assets underpinning their co-production: (1) the governing of strategic behaviour for regulating NCP, (2) governing habitat management for experiences in nature, (3) governing habitat management for pest control, (4) collaborative governance for timber, (5) local governance for experiences in nature, and (6) promoting knowledge for habitat protection. Our analysis thereby unveils how policies intend to govern anthropogenic capitals related to the co-production of specific forest NCP. The findings, including the six archetypes, can support policymakers in designing policies across governance levels.

KW - Archetypes

KW - Institutions

KW - Anthropogenic assets

KW - Coproduction

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Multi-level governance

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180561554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8268c61f-f36e-328c-97fd-72e2d9e33151/

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103657

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103657

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 152

JO - Environmental Science & Policy

JF - Environmental Science & Policy

SN - 1462-9011

M1 - 103657

ER -