Germination performance of native and non-native Ulmus pumila populations

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Germination is a crucial step for invasive plants to extend their distribution under different environmental conditions in a new range. Therefore, information on germination characteristics of invasive plant species provides invaluable knowledge about the factors which might contribute to the invasion success. Moreover, intra-specific comparisons under controlled conditions will show if different responses between non-native and native populations are caused by evolutionary changes or by phenotypic plasticity towards different environmental influences. This paper focuses on the germination of native and non-native Ulmus pumila populations. We expected that non-native populations would be characterized by their higher final germination percentage and enhanced germination rate, which might indicate an influence due to corresponding climatic conditions. Germination experiments with a moderate and a warm temperature treatment did not reveal significant differences in final germination percentage. However, seeds from the North American non-native range germinated significantly faster than native seeds (p < 0.001). Additionally, mean time to germination in both ranges was significantly negatively correlated with annual precipitation (p = 0.022). At the same time, this relationship is stronger in the native range whereas mean time to germination in non-native populations seems to be less influenced by climatic conditions. Different germination responses of the North American populations could be caused by a fast evolutionary change mediating a higher tolerance to current climatic conditions in the non-native range. However, our findings could also be caused by artificial selection during the introduction process and extensive planting of Ulmus pumila in its non-native range. Nevertheless, we assume that the faster germination rate of non-native populations is one potential explanation for the invasion success of Ulmus pumila in its new range since it might provide a competitive advantage during colonization of new sites.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNeoBiota
Volume15
Issue number15
Pages (from-to)53-68
Number of pages16
ISSN1619-0033
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14.12.2012

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Peter Leonhard

Publications

  1. MindMatters
  2. Overyielding in experimental grassland communities - Irrespective of species pool or spatial scale
  3. An InfoSpace Paradigm for Local and ad hoc Peer-to-Peer Communication
  4. Tree cover mediates the effect on rapeseed leaf damage of excluding predatory arthropods, but in an unexpected way
  5. Exploring Affective Human-Robot Interaction with Movie Scenes
  6. Interplay of formative assessment and instructional quality—interactive effects on students’ mathematics achievement
  7. Using Large N Longitudinal Comparison to Explain Political Recruitment in Changing Democracies
  8. Where are we with? A dialectical theory on innovation
  9. Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors for Track Applications
  10. Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment
  11. Søren Kierkegaard in deutscher Sprache
  12. Can management-sponsored non-binding remuneration votes shape the executive compensation structure?
  13. Enforcement concepts and strategies in the EU
  14. Diffusion of the Balanced Scorecard
  15. Perceptions of Organizational Downsizing
  16. Proceedings SMC 2016
  17. A new and benign hegemon on the horizon?
  18. Formative Assessment in Mathematics Instruction
  19. Use of lignins from sugarcane bagasse for assembling microparticles loaded with Azadirachta indica extracts for use as neem-based organic insecticides
  20. What is normal?
  21. Small-scale soil patterns drive sharp boundaries between succulent "dwarf" biomes (or habitats) in the arid Succulent Karoo, South Africa
  22. ETL ensembles for chunking, NER and SRL
  23. Ensuring tests of conservation interventions build on existing literature
  24. Preference and willingness to pay for meat substitutes based on micro-algae
  25. What has gone wrong with application development? Who is the culprit?
  26. Design It!
  27. Can isometric testing substitute for the one repetition maximum squat test?

Press / Media

  1. Die da oben?