General Patterns and Conclusions

Stefan Schaltegger; Dorli  Harms

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06227-3_15

General Patterns and Conclusions

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review

Standard

General Patterns and Conclusions. / Schaltegger, Stefan ; Harms, Dorli.
Corporate Sustainability in International Comparison: State of Practice, Opportunities and Challenges. ed. / Stefan Schaltegger; Sarah Elena Windolph; Dorli Harms; Jacob Hörisch. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG, 2014. p. 241-252 (Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science; Vol. 31).

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Schaltegger, S & Harms, D 2014, General Patterns and Conclusions. in S Schaltegger, SE Windolph, D Harms & J Hörisch (eds), Corporate Sustainability in International Comparison: State of Practice, Opportunities and Challenges. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol. 31, Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, pp. 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06227-3_15

APA

Schaltegger, S., & Harms, D. (2014). General Patterns and Conclusions. In S. Schaltegger, S. E. Windolph, D. Harms, & J. Hörisch (Eds.), Corporate Sustainability in International Comparison: State of Practice, Opportunities and Challenges (pp. 241-252). (Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science; Vol. 31). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06227-3_15

Vancouver

Schaltegger S , Harms D. General Patterns and Conclusions. In Schaltegger S, Windolph SE, Harms D, Hörisch J, editors, Corporate Sustainability in International Comparison: State of Practice, Opportunities and Challenges. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. 2014. p. 241-252. (Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-06227-3_15

Bibtex

@inbook{4fc1b82dd1e94afeab50ab8806ae8b60,

title = "General Patterns and Conclusions",

abstract = "Do global patterns of corporate sustainability management exist or are national differences reflected in substantially different corporate practices? This chapter reviews the literature supporting these two lines of argumentation. By taking a {\textquoteleft}bird{\textquoteright}s view{\textquoteright} of the overall patterns of sustainability management, we examine whether similarities or differences are predominant on the basis of the International Corporate Sustainability Barometer data. The key findings are that similarities predominate for the overall pattern but some national differences are found when examining the results in detail.",

keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, Corporate Social Responsibility, Intensity Level, Sustainability Management, Large Company, Uncertainty Avoidance",

author = "Stefan Schaltegger and Dorli Harms",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-06227-3_15",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-319-06226-6",

series = "Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science",

publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",

pages = "241--252",

editor = "Schaltegger, {Stefan } and Windolph, {Sarah Elena} and Dorli Harms and Jacob H{\"o}risch",

booktitle = "Corporate Sustainability in International Comparison",

address = "Switzerland",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - General Patterns and Conclusions

AU - Schaltegger, Stefan

AU - Harms, Dorli

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Do global patterns of corporate sustainability management exist or are national differences reflected in substantially different corporate practices? This chapter reviews the literature supporting these two lines of argumentation. By taking a ‘bird’s view’ of the overall patterns of sustainability management, we examine whether similarities or differences are predominant on the basis of the International Corporate Sustainability Barometer data. The key findings are that similarities predominate for the overall pattern but some national differences are found when examining the results in detail.

AB - Do global patterns of corporate sustainability management exist or are national differences reflected in substantially different corporate practices? This chapter reviews the literature supporting these two lines of argumentation. By taking a ‘bird’s view’ of the overall patterns of sustainability management, we examine whether similarities or differences are predominant on the basis of the International Corporate Sustainability Barometer data. The key findings are that similarities predominate for the overall pattern but some national differences are found when examining the results in detail.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - Corporate Social Responsibility

KW - Intensity Level

KW - Sustainability Management

KW - Large Company

KW - Uncertainty Avoidance

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-06227-3_15

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-06227-3_15

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 978-3-319-06226-6

T3 - Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science

SP - 241

EP - 252

BT - Corporate Sustainability in International Comparison

A2 - Schaltegger, Stefan

A2 - Windolph, Sarah Elena

A2 - Harms, Dorli

A2 - Hörisch, Jacob

PB - Springer International Publishing AG

CY - Cham

ER -

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06227-3_15
Final published version

General Patterns and Conclusions

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

RIS

Other publications by the same author(s)

Corporate change agents for sustainability: Transforming organizations from the inside out

From rebound to reinforcement effects. The role of analyzing underlying mechanisms for accounting

Mainstreaming regenerative dynamics for sustainability

Unternehmerisches Pandemiecontrolling: Damit “nach der Krise” nicht “vor der Krise” wird

Welche Dienstleistungen benötigt die (große) Nachhaltigkeitstransformation

DOI