Functional domains of business incubators for refugee entrepreneurs

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Functional domains of business incubators for refugee entrepreneurs. / Harima, Aki; Freudenberg, Julia; Halberstadt, Jantje.
In: Journal of Enterprising Communities, Vol. 14, No. 5, 10.12.2020, p. 687-711.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Harima A, Freudenberg J, Halberstadt J. Functional domains of business incubators for refugee entrepreneurs. Journal of Enterprising Communities. 2020 Dec 10;14(5):687-711. Epub 2019 Mar 18. doi: 10.1108/JEC-11-2018-0081

Bibtex

@article{31dde64c7b9e4c34b57b73c2ab5eb3f2,
title = "Functional domains of business incubators for refugee entrepreneurs",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize business incubators and their support for entrepreneurial refugees. While the number of initiatives supporting refugees{\textquoteright} entrepreneurial activities has increased in recent years, we still know little about how they differ from other types of business incubators. Design/methodology/approach: This case study investigates a business incubator in Hamburg, Germany, targeting enterprising refugees. For this paper, 14 in-depth interviews with program participants and incubation managers were conducted. Findings: This paper inductively derives five functional domains of refugee business incubators: providing structured entrepreneurial knowledge; alleviating anxiety related to institutional differences; guiding through the process at the incubator and motivating participants; understanding and tapping into social capital in the host country; and providing soft support concerning personal matters. The findings show that business incubators could and possibly should address specific needs of refugees and that there is much room for improvement. This study suggests that the five domains listed above represent key characteristics that distinguish refugee business incubators from traditional business incubators. Practical implications: This paper offers valuable practical insights for refugee business incubators, which need to consider and develop functional domains listed above. Because these kinds of incubators are a fairly recent phenomenon, there is a general lack of and need for blueprints. The findings of this paper suggest that business incubators could integrate and support entrepreneurial refugees provided that they consider the five functional domains identified here. The findings also provide evidence that entrepreneurship can be a possible means of vocational integration for refugees and one way of institutions and policy-makers in host country seeking to support refugees{\textquoteright} entrepreneurial activities, for example, by developing or subsidizing business incubators targeting refugees. Originality/value: This paper{\textquoteright}s contributions are twofold. First, this paper addresses a gap in the literature on refugee entrepreneurship by providing insights concerning the important role of support institutions. Second, this paper conceptualizes business incubators for enterprising refugees as a distinctive type of business incubators. This paper has, however, some limitations. Because it only considered a relatively small number of refugee entrepreneurs, it is difficult to generalize the findings. The cross-cultural setting of the empirical study, with its potential for linguistic and cultural misunderstandings, may have affected the results.",
keywords = "Entrepreneurial support, Institutional barriers, Non-profit business incubators, Refugee entrepreneurs, Entrepreneurship, Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics",
author = "Aki Harima and Julia Freudenberg and Jantje Halberstadt",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1108/JEC-11-2018-0081",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "687--711",
journal = "Journal of Enterprising Communities",
issn = "1750-6204",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional domains of business incubators for refugee entrepreneurs

AU - Harima, Aki

AU - Freudenberg, Julia

AU - Halberstadt, Jantje

PY - 2020/12/10

Y1 - 2020/12/10

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize business incubators and their support for entrepreneurial refugees. While the number of initiatives supporting refugees’ entrepreneurial activities has increased in recent years, we still know little about how they differ from other types of business incubators. Design/methodology/approach: This case study investigates a business incubator in Hamburg, Germany, targeting enterprising refugees. For this paper, 14 in-depth interviews with program participants and incubation managers were conducted. Findings: This paper inductively derives five functional domains of refugee business incubators: providing structured entrepreneurial knowledge; alleviating anxiety related to institutional differences; guiding through the process at the incubator and motivating participants; understanding and tapping into social capital in the host country; and providing soft support concerning personal matters. The findings show that business incubators could and possibly should address specific needs of refugees and that there is much room for improvement. This study suggests that the five domains listed above represent key characteristics that distinguish refugee business incubators from traditional business incubators. Practical implications: This paper offers valuable practical insights for refugee business incubators, which need to consider and develop functional domains listed above. Because these kinds of incubators are a fairly recent phenomenon, there is a general lack of and need for blueprints. The findings of this paper suggest that business incubators could integrate and support entrepreneurial refugees provided that they consider the five functional domains identified here. The findings also provide evidence that entrepreneurship can be a possible means of vocational integration for refugees and one way of institutions and policy-makers in host country seeking to support refugees’ entrepreneurial activities, for example, by developing or subsidizing business incubators targeting refugees. Originality/value: This paper’s contributions are twofold. First, this paper addresses a gap in the literature on refugee entrepreneurship by providing insights concerning the important role of support institutions. Second, this paper conceptualizes business incubators for enterprising refugees as a distinctive type of business incubators. This paper has, however, some limitations. Because it only considered a relatively small number of refugee entrepreneurs, it is difficult to generalize the findings. The cross-cultural setting of the empirical study, with its potential for linguistic and cultural misunderstandings, may have affected the results.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize business incubators and their support for entrepreneurial refugees. While the number of initiatives supporting refugees’ entrepreneurial activities has increased in recent years, we still know little about how they differ from other types of business incubators. Design/methodology/approach: This case study investigates a business incubator in Hamburg, Germany, targeting enterprising refugees. For this paper, 14 in-depth interviews with program participants and incubation managers were conducted. Findings: This paper inductively derives five functional domains of refugee business incubators: providing structured entrepreneurial knowledge; alleviating anxiety related to institutional differences; guiding through the process at the incubator and motivating participants; understanding and tapping into social capital in the host country; and providing soft support concerning personal matters. The findings show that business incubators could and possibly should address specific needs of refugees and that there is much room for improvement. This study suggests that the five domains listed above represent key characteristics that distinguish refugee business incubators from traditional business incubators. Practical implications: This paper offers valuable practical insights for refugee business incubators, which need to consider and develop functional domains listed above. Because these kinds of incubators are a fairly recent phenomenon, there is a general lack of and need for blueprints. The findings of this paper suggest that business incubators could integrate and support entrepreneurial refugees provided that they consider the five functional domains identified here. The findings also provide evidence that entrepreneurship can be a possible means of vocational integration for refugees and one way of institutions and policy-makers in host country seeking to support refugees’ entrepreneurial activities, for example, by developing or subsidizing business incubators targeting refugees. Originality/value: This paper’s contributions are twofold. First, this paper addresses a gap in the literature on refugee entrepreneurship by providing insights concerning the important role of support institutions. Second, this paper conceptualizes business incubators for enterprising refugees as a distinctive type of business incubators. This paper has, however, some limitations. Because it only considered a relatively small number of refugee entrepreneurs, it is difficult to generalize the findings. The cross-cultural setting of the empirical study, with its potential for linguistic and cultural misunderstandings, may have affected the results.

KW - Entrepreneurial support

KW - Institutional barriers

KW - Non-profit business incubators

KW - Refugee entrepreneurs

KW - Entrepreneurship

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

U2 - 10.1108/JEC-11-2018-0081

DO - 10.1108/JEC-11-2018-0081

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85063590704

VL - 14

SP - 687

EP - 711

JO - Journal of Enterprising Communities

JF - Journal of Enterprising Communities

SN - 1750-6204

IS - 5

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Magnesium recycling: State-of-the-Art developments, part I
  2. A virus of distrust?
  3. The Altmark Trans judgment: consequences for the hospital sector
  4. Hochschulentwicklung als Lernkontext: Studierende zu Mitgestaltenden machen durch Forschendes Lernen
  5. Who participates in which type of teacher professional development?
  6. Das Reflexivitätsproblem und die Kategorienlehre
  7. Ein Jahr geht noch
  8. Tolerance of ambiguity
  9. No matter what the name, we’re all the same? Examining ethnic online discrimination in ridesharing marketplaces
  10. Extended Kalman Filter for Temperature Estimation and Control of Peltier Cells in a Novel Industrial Milling Process
  11. Sphodrini
  12. Microstructure, mechanical and corrosion properties of Mg-Dy-Gd-Zr alloys for medical applications
  13. A servo piezo mechanical hydraulic actuator and its control for camless internal combustion engines
  14. Sind ausbildende Handwerksbetriebe erfolgreicher?
  15. Environmental Management Accounting for Staff Appraisal
  16. Demographic change in work organizations
  17. Existenzgründung
  18. An Appealing Option?
  19. Interactions between Climate and Trade Policies
  20. Postmoderne
  21. Wertwissen
  22. Glen Mills Schools
  23. Automatisierung eines ToF-Messstands
  24. Führung in Heterarchien
  25. Analysis of nutrition-relevant trace elements in human blood and serum by means of total reflection X-ray fluorescence (TXRF) spectroscopy
  26. The informed society
  27. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a web-based and mobile stress-management intervention for employees
  28. Digital Transformation of Interdisciplinary Engineering Education
  29. Begriff und Merkmale junger Unternehmen