Functional domains of business incubators for refugee entrepreneurs

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Functional domains of business incubators for refugee entrepreneurs. / Harima, Aki; Freudenberg, Julia; Halberstadt, Jantje.
In: Journal of Enterprising Communities, Vol. 14, No. 5, 10.12.2020, p. 687-711.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Harima A, Freudenberg J, Halberstadt J. Functional domains of business incubators for refugee entrepreneurs. Journal of Enterprising Communities. 2020 Dec 10;14(5):687-711. Epub 2019 Mar 18. doi: 10.1108/JEC-11-2018-0081

Bibtex

@article{31dde64c7b9e4c34b57b73c2ab5eb3f2,
title = "Functional domains of business incubators for refugee entrepreneurs",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize business incubators and their support for entrepreneurial refugees. While the number of initiatives supporting refugees{\textquoteright} entrepreneurial activities has increased in recent years, we still know little about how they differ from other types of business incubators. Design/methodology/approach: This case study investigates a business incubator in Hamburg, Germany, targeting enterprising refugees. For this paper, 14 in-depth interviews with program participants and incubation managers were conducted. Findings: This paper inductively derives five functional domains of refugee business incubators: providing structured entrepreneurial knowledge; alleviating anxiety related to institutional differences; guiding through the process at the incubator and motivating participants; understanding and tapping into social capital in the host country; and providing soft support concerning personal matters. The findings show that business incubators could and possibly should address specific needs of refugees and that there is much room for improvement. This study suggests that the five domains listed above represent key characteristics that distinguish refugee business incubators from traditional business incubators. Practical implications: This paper offers valuable practical insights for refugee business incubators, which need to consider and develop functional domains listed above. Because these kinds of incubators are a fairly recent phenomenon, there is a general lack of and need for blueprints. The findings of this paper suggest that business incubators could integrate and support entrepreneurial refugees provided that they consider the five functional domains identified here. The findings also provide evidence that entrepreneurship can be a possible means of vocational integration for refugees and one way of institutions and policy-makers in host country seeking to support refugees{\textquoteright} entrepreneurial activities, for example, by developing or subsidizing business incubators targeting refugees. Originality/value: This paper{\textquoteright}s contributions are twofold. First, this paper addresses a gap in the literature on refugee entrepreneurship by providing insights concerning the important role of support institutions. Second, this paper conceptualizes business incubators for enterprising refugees as a distinctive type of business incubators. This paper has, however, some limitations. Because it only considered a relatively small number of refugee entrepreneurs, it is difficult to generalize the findings. The cross-cultural setting of the empirical study, with its potential for linguistic and cultural misunderstandings, may have affected the results.",
keywords = "Entrepreneurial support, Institutional barriers, Non-profit business incubators, Refugee entrepreneurs, Entrepreneurship, Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics",
author = "Aki Harima and Julia Freudenberg and Jantje Halberstadt",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1108/JEC-11-2018-0081",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "687--711",
journal = "Journal of Enterprising Communities",
issn = "1750-6204",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional domains of business incubators for refugee entrepreneurs

AU - Harima, Aki

AU - Freudenberg, Julia

AU - Halberstadt, Jantje

PY - 2020/12/10

Y1 - 2020/12/10

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize business incubators and their support for entrepreneurial refugees. While the number of initiatives supporting refugees’ entrepreneurial activities has increased in recent years, we still know little about how they differ from other types of business incubators. Design/methodology/approach: This case study investigates a business incubator in Hamburg, Germany, targeting enterprising refugees. For this paper, 14 in-depth interviews with program participants and incubation managers were conducted. Findings: This paper inductively derives five functional domains of refugee business incubators: providing structured entrepreneurial knowledge; alleviating anxiety related to institutional differences; guiding through the process at the incubator and motivating participants; understanding and tapping into social capital in the host country; and providing soft support concerning personal matters. The findings show that business incubators could and possibly should address specific needs of refugees and that there is much room for improvement. This study suggests that the five domains listed above represent key characteristics that distinguish refugee business incubators from traditional business incubators. Practical implications: This paper offers valuable practical insights for refugee business incubators, which need to consider and develop functional domains listed above. Because these kinds of incubators are a fairly recent phenomenon, there is a general lack of and need for blueprints. The findings of this paper suggest that business incubators could integrate and support entrepreneurial refugees provided that they consider the five functional domains identified here. The findings also provide evidence that entrepreneurship can be a possible means of vocational integration for refugees and one way of institutions and policy-makers in host country seeking to support refugees’ entrepreneurial activities, for example, by developing or subsidizing business incubators targeting refugees. Originality/value: This paper’s contributions are twofold. First, this paper addresses a gap in the literature on refugee entrepreneurship by providing insights concerning the important role of support institutions. Second, this paper conceptualizes business incubators for enterprising refugees as a distinctive type of business incubators. This paper has, however, some limitations. Because it only considered a relatively small number of refugee entrepreneurs, it is difficult to generalize the findings. The cross-cultural setting of the empirical study, with its potential for linguistic and cultural misunderstandings, may have affected the results.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize business incubators and their support for entrepreneurial refugees. While the number of initiatives supporting refugees’ entrepreneurial activities has increased in recent years, we still know little about how they differ from other types of business incubators. Design/methodology/approach: This case study investigates a business incubator in Hamburg, Germany, targeting enterprising refugees. For this paper, 14 in-depth interviews with program participants and incubation managers were conducted. Findings: This paper inductively derives five functional domains of refugee business incubators: providing structured entrepreneurial knowledge; alleviating anxiety related to institutional differences; guiding through the process at the incubator and motivating participants; understanding and tapping into social capital in the host country; and providing soft support concerning personal matters. The findings show that business incubators could and possibly should address specific needs of refugees and that there is much room for improvement. This study suggests that the five domains listed above represent key characteristics that distinguish refugee business incubators from traditional business incubators. Practical implications: This paper offers valuable practical insights for refugee business incubators, which need to consider and develop functional domains listed above. Because these kinds of incubators are a fairly recent phenomenon, there is a general lack of and need for blueprints. The findings of this paper suggest that business incubators could integrate and support entrepreneurial refugees provided that they consider the five functional domains identified here. The findings also provide evidence that entrepreneurship can be a possible means of vocational integration for refugees and one way of institutions and policy-makers in host country seeking to support refugees’ entrepreneurial activities, for example, by developing or subsidizing business incubators targeting refugees. Originality/value: This paper’s contributions are twofold. First, this paper addresses a gap in the literature on refugee entrepreneurship by providing insights concerning the important role of support institutions. Second, this paper conceptualizes business incubators for enterprising refugees as a distinctive type of business incubators. This paper has, however, some limitations. Because it only considered a relatively small number of refugee entrepreneurs, it is difficult to generalize the findings. The cross-cultural setting of the empirical study, with its potential for linguistic and cultural misunderstandings, may have affected the results.

KW - Entrepreneurial support

KW - Institutional barriers

KW - Non-profit business incubators

KW - Refugee entrepreneurs

KW - Entrepreneurship

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

U2 - 10.1108/JEC-11-2018-0081

DO - 10.1108/JEC-11-2018-0081

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85063590704

VL - 14

SP - 687

EP - 711

JO - Journal of Enterprising Communities

JF - Journal of Enterprising Communities

SN - 1750-6204

IS - 5

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Promoting recovery in daily life
  2. Lekcja 27-28
  3. Studiengang "Master in Auditing" an der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg
  4. Effects of introspective vs. extraspective instruction in scaling of hedonic properties of flavouring ingredients by Chinese and German subjects
  5. Generalising IRT to Discriminate Between Examinees
  6. Application of Adaptive Element-Free Galerkin Method to Simulate Friction Stir Welding of Aluminum
  7. The relevance of international restoration principles for ecosystem restoration practice in Rwanda
  8. Sexing Berlin?
  9. Der extrovertierte Rechtstaat
  10. Diversion
  11. Akademisches Schreiben
  12. Green and Sustainable Extraction of High-Value Compounds
  13. Provenance- and life-history stage-specific responses of the dwarf shrub Calluna vulgaris to elevated vapour pressure deficit
  14. Political Representation in the EU
  15. Analysis of estrogenic activity in coastal surface waters of the Baltic Sea using the yeast estrogen screen
  16. Decentralized planning and control for assembly areas driven by Gentelligent® parts
  17. What Is the Impact of Financial Penalties on the Performance and Stock Returns of Banks?
  18. Plant–flower visitor interaction webs
  19. Measuring Variation in Gaze Following Across Communities, Ages, and Individuals
  20. The state of the internets
  21. Significance of Antibiotics in the Environment
  22. Perspective as Practice. Renaissance Cultures of Optics, (About the development of optics and perspective between the fifteenth and seventeenth centuries) (TECHNE 1) Dupré, Sven (ed.): Brepols, Turnhout 2019
  23. VIPs in der Lesesozialisation ?
  24. Calibration of the Chemcatcher ® passive sampler for monitoring selected polar and semi-polar pesticides in surface water
  25. Lebhafte Artefakte oder „Wenn Roboter Hände schütteln“
  26. An innovative teaching approach in Engineering Education to impart reflective digitalization competences