Franchising as a Strategy for Combining Small and Large Group Advantages (Logics) in Social Entrepreneurship: A Hayekian Perspective
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 3, 06.2014, p. 502-522.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Franchising as a Strategy for Combining Small and Large Group Advantages (Logics) in Social Entrepreneurship
T2 - A Hayekian Perspective
AU - Beckmann, Markus
AU - Zeyen, Anica
PY - 2014/6
Y1 - 2014/6
N2 - This article develops a Hayekian perspective on social franchising that distinguishes between the end-connected logic of the small group and the rule-connected logic of the big group. Our key claim is that mission-driven social entrepreneurs often draw on the small-group logic when starting their social ventures and then face difficulties when the process of scaling shifts their operations toward a big-group logic. In this situation, social franchising offers a strategy to replicate the small group despite systemwide scaling, to mobilize decentrally accessible social capital, and to reduce agency costs through mechanisms of self-selection and self-monitoring. By employing a Hayekian perspective, we are thus able to offer an explanation as to why social franchising is a suitable scaling strategy for some social entrepreneurship organizations and not for others. We illustrate our work using the Ashoka Fellow Wellcome.
AB - This article develops a Hayekian perspective on social franchising that distinguishes between the end-connected logic of the small group and the rule-connected logic of the big group. Our key claim is that mission-driven social entrepreneurs often draw on the small-group logic when starting their social ventures and then face difficulties when the process of scaling shifts their operations toward a big-group logic. In this situation, social franchising offers a strategy to replicate the small group despite systemwide scaling, to mobilize decentrally accessible social capital, and to reduce agency costs through mechanisms of self-selection and self-monitoring. By employing a Hayekian perspective, we are thus able to offer an explanation as to why social franchising is a suitable scaling strategy for some social entrepreneurship organizations and not for others. We illustrate our work using the Ashoka Fellow Wellcome.
KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics
KW - agency theory
KW - scaling
KW - social entrepreneurship
KW - social franchising
KW - volunteer involvement
KW - agency theory
KW - scaling
KW - social entrepreneurship
KW - social franchising
KW - volunteer involvement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901922428&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0899764012470758
DO - 10.1177/0899764012470758
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:84901922428
VL - 43
SP - 502
EP - 522
JO - Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
JF - Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
SN - 0899-7640
IS - 3
ER -