TY - JOUR

T1 - Framing environmental sustainability challenges for research and innovation in European policy agendas

AU - Diedrich, Amy

AU - Upham, Paul

AU - Levidow, Les

AU - van den Hove, Sybille

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Recent EU policy has linked research agendas with societal challenges, which has resulted in an increased emphasis on the need for exchange of knowledge between research and non-research actors, especially civil society organisations. Concurrent with this, has been a call for democratic accountability of research agendas and science that addresses Grand Societal Challenges. The challenge of environmental sustainability features strongly in these discussions with an emphasis on global warming, the tightening of energy, water and food supplies, and the overarching goal of achieving an 'eco-efficient economy'. However, this challenge can be defined in various ways, with different definitions orienting towards different solutions many of which we argue may be contradictory to the goal of environmental sustainability. In this commentary we illustrate how dominant research agendas are often orientated towards the partisan agendas of influential stakeholders, favouring myopic technological fixes and marginalising other civil society actors and critical insights from social science. Our main recommendations include a more dominant role for social sciences, involving civil society more actively in research agenda setting, increased communication, information sharing and capacity building, and increased interdisciplinarity.

AB - Recent EU policy has linked research agendas with societal challenges, which has resulted in an increased emphasis on the need for exchange of knowledge between research and non-research actors, especially civil society organisations. Concurrent with this, has been a call for democratic accountability of research agendas and science that addresses Grand Societal Challenges. The challenge of environmental sustainability features strongly in these discussions with an emphasis on global warming, the tightening of energy, water and food supplies, and the overarching goal of achieving an 'eco-efficient economy'. However, this challenge can be defined in various ways, with different definitions orienting towards different solutions many of which we argue may be contradictory to the goal of environmental sustainability. In this commentary we illustrate how dominant research agendas are often orientated towards the partisan agendas of influential stakeholders, favouring myopic technological fixes and marginalising other civil society actors and critical insights from social science. Our main recommendations include a more dominant role for social sciences, involving civil society more actively in research agenda setting, increased communication, information sharing and capacity building, and increased interdisciplinarity.

KW - Civil society

KW - Co-operative research

KW - Environmental sustainability

KW - Europe

KW - Social science

KW - Societal challenges

KW - Techno-environmental innovation

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82655172443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e4cc1abd-cedb-3299-81e7-aab150e1b335/

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.07.012

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.07.012

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:82655172443

VL - 14

SP - 935

EP - 939

JO - Environmental Science & Policy

JF - Environmental Science & Policy

SN - 1462-9011

IS - 8

ER -