Fast response of groundwater to heavy rainfall

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Fast response of groundwater to heavy rainfall. / Wittenberg, Hartmut; Aksoy, Hafzullah; Miegel, Konrad.

In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 571, 01.04.2019, p. 837-842.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wittenberg H, Aksoy H, Miegel K. Fast response of groundwater to heavy rainfall. Journal of Hydrology. 2019 Apr 1;571:837-842. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.037

Bibtex

@article{bc51a65fca6f4a0c89afc5d1f83e4fa3,
title = "Fast response of groundwater to heavy rainfall",
abstract = "Groundwater recharge by precipitation is often assumed by practitioners as well as scientists to be a slow process of filtration through layers of uniform texture analogous to Darcy's law. In most basins, however, rainwater also finds its way through macropores and preferential pathways to the shallow unconfined aquifers within hours of falling. Recharge phases may extend over several days, increasing groundwater levels, stored volume and hence baseflows into adjoining rivers. In this study, groundwater recharge and storage are computed from baseflow as separated with a nonlinear reservoir algorithm from time series of daily flows at gauging stations in northern Germany. Results are compared to groundwater level fluctuation in the catchments and to daily seepage rates measured in a lysimeter station. Peak times of the fast transfer of rain water through the vadose zone are generally the same. However, while recharge from baseflow ends when baseflow assumes its typical recession, the attenuation of lysimeter seepage may last much longer. The volume of lysimeter seepage is generally higher than the recharge in catchments due not only to different vegetation but also to rim effects impeding direct runoff. Furthermore, the lysimeter walls allow vertical fluxes only. Without further evidence or improved devices, lysimeter seepage should therefore not be indicated as groundwater recharge for the site or catchment. Findings also indicate that the shape of derived recharge unit responses is practically time invariant but with a strong seasonal variation in the recharge-rainfall ratio of precipitation events.",
keywords = "Ecosystems Research",
author = "Hartmut Wittenberg and Hafzullah Aksoy and Konrad Miegel",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.037",
language = "English",
volume = "571",
pages = "837--842",
journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
issn = "0022-1694",
publisher = "Elsevier Publishing",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fast response of groundwater to heavy rainfall

AU - Wittenberg, Hartmut

AU - Aksoy, Hafzullah

AU - Miegel, Konrad

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Groundwater recharge by precipitation is often assumed by practitioners as well as scientists to be a slow process of filtration through layers of uniform texture analogous to Darcy's law. In most basins, however, rainwater also finds its way through macropores and preferential pathways to the shallow unconfined aquifers within hours of falling. Recharge phases may extend over several days, increasing groundwater levels, stored volume and hence baseflows into adjoining rivers. In this study, groundwater recharge and storage are computed from baseflow as separated with a nonlinear reservoir algorithm from time series of daily flows at gauging stations in northern Germany. Results are compared to groundwater level fluctuation in the catchments and to daily seepage rates measured in a lysimeter station. Peak times of the fast transfer of rain water through the vadose zone are generally the same. However, while recharge from baseflow ends when baseflow assumes its typical recession, the attenuation of lysimeter seepage may last much longer. The volume of lysimeter seepage is generally higher than the recharge in catchments due not only to different vegetation but also to rim effects impeding direct runoff. Furthermore, the lysimeter walls allow vertical fluxes only. Without further evidence or improved devices, lysimeter seepage should therefore not be indicated as groundwater recharge for the site or catchment. Findings also indicate that the shape of derived recharge unit responses is practically time invariant but with a strong seasonal variation in the recharge-rainfall ratio of precipitation events.

AB - Groundwater recharge by precipitation is often assumed by practitioners as well as scientists to be a slow process of filtration through layers of uniform texture analogous to Darcy's law. In most basins, however, rainwater also finds its way through macropores and preferential pathways to the shallow unconfined aquifers within hours of falling. Recharge phases may extend over several days, increasing groundwater levels, stored volume and hence baseflows into adjoining rivers. In this study, groundwater recharge and storage are computed from baseflow as separated with a nonlinear reservoir algorithm from time series of daily flows at gauging stations in northern Germany. Results are compared to groundwater level fluctuation in the catchments and to daily seepage rates measured in a lysimeter station. Peak times of the fast transfer of rain water through the vadose zone are generally the same. However, while recharge from baseflow ends when baseflow assumes its typical recession, the attenuation of lysimeter seepage may last much longer. The volume of lysimeter seepage is generally higher than the recharge in catchments due not only to different vegetation but also to rim effects impeding direct runoff. Furthermore, the lysimeter walls allow vertical fluxes only. Without further evidence or improved devices, lysimeter seepage should therefore not be indicated as groundwater recharge for the site or catchment. Findings also indicate that the shape of derived recharge unit responses is practically time invariant but with a strong seasonal variation in the recharge-rainfall ratio of precipitation events.

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062303008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.037

DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.037

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85062303008

VL - 571

SP - 837

EP - 842

JO - Journal of Hydrology

JF - Journal of Hydrology

SN - 0022-1694

ER -