Exploring the interdependence of climate, finance, energy, and geopolitics: A conceptual framework for systemic risks amidst multiple crises
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Applied Energy, Vol. 361, 122885, 01.05.2024.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the interdependence of climate, finance, energy, and geopolitics
T2 - A conceptual framework for systemic risks amidst multiple crises
AU - Hoffart, Franziska M.
AU - D'Orazio, Paola
AU - Holz, Franziska
AU - Kemfert, Claudia
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/5/1
Y1 - 2024/5/1
N2 - Navigating the transition toward a zero-emission and just future amidst multiple crises requires a nuanced understanding of potential hindrances to investments and energy transitions. As current approaches hardly consider the big picture of interacting crises, this study offers a framework to analyze the dynamics and risk channels between 1) the climate crisis, 2) financial (in)stability, 3) the geopolitical energy crisis, and 4) the energy transitions. Our framework reveals that the dynamics depends on the specific emergency policy. Hence, we apply the framework to a German Case study. Our findings reveal that fossil energy security policies and insufficient macroprudential policies can threaten the energy transition and financial stability exacerbating negative feedback loops. The discussion highlights that short-term emergency policies outweighing long-term climate goals fail to secure financial stability, reduce transition risks, or accelerate the energy transition. In conclusion, crises can catalyse the transition if short-term emergency policies are harmonized with long-term climate goals advocating for a coherent policy framework.
AB - Navigating the transition toward a zero-emission and just future amidst multiple crises requires a nuanced understanding of potential hindrances to investments and energy transitions. As current approaches hardly consider the big picture of interacting crises, this study offers a framework to analyze the dynamics and risk channels between 1) the climate crisis, 2) financial (in)stability, 3) the geopolitical energy crisis, and 4) the energy transitions. Our framework reveals that the dynamics depends on the specific emergency policy. Hence, we apply the framework to a German Case study. Our findings reveal that fossil energy security policies and insufficient macroprudential policies can threaten the energy transition and financial stability exacerbating negative feedback loops. The discussion highlights that short-term emergency policies outweighing long-term climate goals fail to secure financial stability, reduce transition risks, or accelerate the energy transition. In conclusion, crises can catalyse the transition if short-term emergency policies are harmonized with long-term climate goals advocating for a coherent policy framework.
KW - Climate policy
KW - Climate-related risks
KW - Compound risks
KW - Energy transition
KW - Financial stability
KW - Geopolitical risk
KW - Environmental Governance
KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186540831&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0a9b9c5a-4abb-39cf-bdcb-7060a206e0d9/
U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122885
DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122885
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85186540831
VL - 361
JO - Applied Energy
JF - Applied Energy
SN - 0306-2619
M1 - 122885
ER -