Evidence-Based Management

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapter

Standard

Evidence-Based Management. / Mensmann, Mona; Rousseau, Denise M.; Frese, Michael.
Handbook of Philosophy of Management. ed. / Cristina Neesham; Markus Reihlen; Dennis Schoeneborn. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2022. p. 39-54 (Handbooks in Philosophy).

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapter

Harvard

Mensmann, M, Rousseau, DM & Frese, M 2022, Evidence-Based Management. in C Neesham, M Reihlen & D Schoeneborn (eds), Handbook of Philosophy of Management. Handbooks in Philosophy, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, pp. 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76606-1_50

APA

Mensmann, M., Rousseau, D. M., & Frese, M. (2022). Evidence-Based Management. In C. Neesham, M. Reihlen, & D. Schoeneborn (Eds.), Handbook of Philosophy of Management (pp. 39-54). (Handbooks in Philosophy). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76606-1_50

Vancouver

Mensmann M, Rousseau DM, Frese M. Evidence-Based Management. In Neesham C, Reihlen M, Schoeneborn D, editors, Handbook of Philosophy of Management. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2022. p. 39-54. (Handbooks in Philosophy). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-76606-1_50

Bibtex

@inbook{b85fd478342141a2aa30a75f01e9f2f4,
title = "Evidence-Based Management",
abstract = "This chapter deals with the concept of evidence-based management (EBM), with a focus on the tension between scientific knowledge and organizational reality, which underlies this managerial practice. It first describes the philosophical roots of EBM and shed light on the multiple sources of knowledge that can and should inform action in organizations. It then discusses why abstract scientific knowledge and managerial acumen often appear incompatible in the context of organizational practice, especially in times of urgency and uncertainty. The chapter concludes by offering ways to reduce this tension by making knowledge actionable and turning action into knowledge. The presented advice regarding the future of EBM may help scholars contribute to more scholarship-informed practice and help practitioners to better balance scientific knowledge and reflective practice for more effective decisions and action.",
keywords = "Management studies, Evidence-based management, Realist rationality, Reflective praxis",
author = "Mona Mensmann and Rousseau, {Denise M.} and Michael Frese",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-76606-1_50",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-030-76605-4",
series = "Handbooks in Philosophy",
publisher = "Springer Nature Switzerland AG",
pages = "39--54",
editor = "Cristina Neesham and Markus Reihlen and Dennis Schoeneborn",
booktitle = "Handbook of Philosophy of Management",
address = "Switzerland",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Evidence-Based Management

AU - Mensmann, Mona

AU - Rousseau, Denise M.

AU - Frese, Michael

PY - 2022/12

Y1 - 2022/12

N2 - This chapter deals with the concept of evidence-based management (EBM), with a focus on the tension between scientific knowledge and organizational reality, which underlies this managerial practice. It first describes the philosophical roots of EBM and shed light on the multiple sources of knowledge that can and should inform action in organizations. It then discusses why abstract scientific knowledge and managerial acumen often appear incompatible in the context of organizational practice, especially in times of urgency and uncertainty. The chapter concludes by offering ways to reduce this tension by making knowledge actionable and turning action into knowledge. The presented advice regarding the future of EBM may help scholars contribute to more scholarship-informed practice and help practitioners to better balance scientific knowledge and reflective practice for more effective decisions and action.

AB - This chapter deals with the concept of evidence-based management (EBM), with a focus on the tension between scientific knowledge and organizational reality, which underlies this managerial practice. It first describes the philosophical roots of EBM and shed light on the multiple sources of knowledge that can and should inform action in organizations. It then discusses why abstract scientific knowledge and managerial acumen often appear incompatible in the context of organizational practice, especially in times of urgency and uncertainty. The chapter concludes by offering ways to reduce this tension by making knowledge actionable and turning action into knowledge. The presented advice regarding the future of EBM may help scholars contribute to more scholarship-informed practice and help practitioners to better balance scientific knowledge and reflective practice for more effective decisions and action.

KW - Management studies

KW - Evidence-based management

KW - Realist rationality

KW - Reflective praxis

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-76606-1_50

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-76606-1_50

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-030-76605-4

T3 - Handbooks in Philosophy

SP - 39

EP - 54

BT - Handbook of Philosophy of Management

A2 - Neesham, Cristina

A2 - Reihlen, Markus

A2 - Schoeneborn, Dennis

PB - Springer Nature Switzerland AG

CY - Cham

ER -