Environmental Governance of China's Belt and Road Initiative
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Environmental Policy and Governance, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2021, p. 3-17.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental Governance of China's Belt and Road Initiative
AU - Coenen, Johanna
AU - Bager, Simon
AU - Meyfroidt, Patrick
AU - Newig, Jens
AU - Challies, Edward
N1 - We would like to thank Joel Persson for his valuable comments made on earlier versions of this article. This work was funded by the Marie Skłodowska‐Curie actions (MSCA grant agreement No 765408) from the European Commission: COUPLED “Operationalising Telecouplings for Solving Sustainability Challenges for Land Use”. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. Environmental Policy and Governance published by ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), launched in 2013, is rapidly subsuming much of China's political and economic involvement abroad. As a far‐reaching infrastructure development and investment strategy, officially involving more than 130 countries, the expansion of the BRI raises important questions about its environmental impacts and its implications for environmental governance. This article examines how China is actively and rapidly developing an institutional architecture for its envisioned “green BRI,” considering the key actors, policies, and initiatives involved in the environmental governance of the BRI. We find that the current institutional architecture of the “green BRI” relies on voluntary corporate self‐governance and a multitude of international and transnational sustainability initiatives. The effectiveness of the environmental governance of the BRI not only hinges on China's priorities and commitments, but also on the political willingness and capacity of BRI partner countries to maintain, implement, and enforce stringent environmental laws and regulations. We conclude by outlining several environmental governance challenges and an agenda for future research.
AB - China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), launched in 2013, is rapidly subsuming much of China's political and economic involvement abroad. As a far‐reaching infrastructure development and investment strategy, officially involving more than 130 countries, the expansion of the BRI raises important questions about its environmental impacts and its implications for environmental governance. This article examines how China is actively and rapidly developing an institutional architecture for its envisioned “green BRI,” considering the key actors, policies, and initiatives involved in the environmental governance of the BRI. We find that the current institutional architecture of the “green BRI” relies on voluntary corporate self‐governance and a multitude of international and transnational sustainability initiatives. The effectiveness of the environmental governance of the BRI not only hinges on China's priorities and commitments, but also on the political willingness and capacity of BRI partner countries to maintain, implement, and enforce stringent environmental laws and regulations. We conclude by outlining several environmental governance challenges and an agenda for future research.
KW - Environmental Governance
KW - environmental policy
KW - global environmental governance
KW - new silk road
KW - sustainable development
KW - telecoupling
KW - environmental policy
KW - global environmental governance
KW - new silk road
KW - sustainable development
KW - telecouping
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/950a603b-1a69-33ed-9c3a-43fc06ec01e9/
U2 - 10.1002/eet.1901
DO - 10.1002/eet.1901
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 31
SP - 3
EP - 17
JO - Environmental Policy and Governance
JF - Environmental Policy and Governance
SN - 1756-932X
IS - 1
ER -