Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a web-based and mobile stress-management intervention for employees: Design of a randomized controlled trial
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 13, No. 1, 655, 15.07.2013.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a web-based and mobile stress-management intervention for employees
T2 - Design of a randomized controlled trial
AU - Heber, Elena
AU - Ebert, David Daniel
AU - Lehr, Dirk
AU - Nobis, Stephanie
AU - Berking, Matthias
AU - Riper, Heleen
N1 - Funding Information: We would like to acknowledge the European Union (EFRE) for funding this project within the Lueneburg Innovation Incubator, TM 1.1 (project number: CCI 2007DE161PR001). Additionally, this study is funded by the health insurance company “Barmer GEK”, which provides financial support for the payments of the eCoaches. Furthermore, we would like to acknowledge our colleagues Hanne Thiart and Torsten Tarnowski for contributing to the development of the intervention.
PY - 2013/7/15
Y1 - 2013/7/15
N2 - Background: Work-related stress is associated with a variety of mental and emotional problems and can lead to substantial economic costs due to lost productivity, absenteeism or the inability to work. There is a considerable amount of evidence on the effectiveness of traditional face-to-face stress-management interventions for employees; however, they are often costly, time-consuming, and characterized by a high access threshold. Web-based interventions may overcome some of these problems yet the evidence in this field is scarce. This paper describes the protocol for a study that will examine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a web-based guided stress-management training which is based on problem solving and emotion regulation and aimed at reducing stress in adult employees. Methods. The study will target stressed employees aged 18 and older. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) design will be applied. Based on a power calculation of d=.35 (1-β of 80%, α =.05), 264 participants will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the intervention group or a six-month waitlist control group. Inclusion criteria include an elevated stress level (Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale-10 ≥ 22) and current employment. Exclusion criteria include risk of suicide or previously diagnosed psychosis or dissociative symptoms. The primary outcome will be perceived stress, and secondary outcomes include depression and anxiety. Data will be collected at baseline and seven weeks and six months after randomization. An extended follow up at 12 months is planned for the intervention group. Moreover, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted from a societal perspective and will include both direct and indirect health care costs. Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis and per protocol. Discussion. The substantial negative consequences of work-related stress emphasize the necessity for effective stress-management trainings. If the proposed internet intervention proves to be (cost-) effective, a preventative, economical stress-management tool will be conceivable. The strengths and limitations of the present study are discussed. Trial registration. German Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS): DRKS00004749.
AB - Background: Work-related stress is associated with a variety of mental and emotional problems and can lead to substantial economic costs due to lost productivity, absenteeism or the inability to work. There is a considerable amount of evidence on the effectiveness of traditional face-to-face stress-management interventions for employees; however, they are often costly, time-consuming, and characterized by a high access threshold. Web-based interventions may overcome some of these problems yet the evidence in this field is scarce. This paper describes the protocol for a study that will examine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a web-based guided stress-management training which is based on problem solving and emotion regulation and aimed at reducing stress in adult employees. Methods. The study will target stressed employees aged 18 and older. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) design will be applied. Based on a power calculation of d=.35 (1-β of 80%, α =.05), 264 participants will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the intervention group or a six-month waitlist control group. Inclusion criteria include an elevated stress level (Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale-10 ≥ 22) and current employment. Exclusion criteria include risk of suicide or previously diagnosed psychosis or dissociative symptoms. The primary outcome will be perceived stress, and secondary outcomes include depression and anxiety. Data will be collected at baseline and seven weeks and six months after randomization. An extended follow up at 12 months is planned for the intervention group. Moreover, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted from a societal perspective and will include both direct and indirect health care costs. Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis and per protocol. Discussion. The substantial negative consequences of work-related stress emphasize the necessity for effective stress-management trainings. If the proposed internet intervention proves to be (cost-) effective, a preventative, economical stress-management tool will be conceivable. The strengths and limitations of the present study are discussed. Trial registration. German Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS): DRKS00004749.
KW - Psychology
KW - Depression
KW - Internetintervention
KW - Efficacy
KW - Work-related stress
KW - Occupational health
KW - Stressmanagement
KW - Cost-effectiveness
KW - Cost-effectiveness
KW - Depression
KW - Efficacy
KW - Internet intervention
KW - Occupational health
KW - Prevention
KW - Stress management
KW - Work-related stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880112078&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1a1131ea-2ef2-3cb0-ab6f-7ece1385bdd5/
U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-13-655
DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-13-655
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 23855376
VL - 13
JO - BMC Public Health
JF - BMC Public Health
SN - 1471-2458
IS - 1
M1 - 655
ER -