Effectiveness of an Internet-Based Self-Help Intervention versus Public Mental Health Advice to Reduce Worry during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pragmatic, Parallel-Group, Randomized Controlled Trial

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{063ea4c1c6ec49e0b81f19730860c138,
title = "Effectiveness of an Internet-Based Self-Help Intervention versus Public Mental Health Advice to Reduce Worry during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pragmatic, Parallel-Group, Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Introduction: The mental health burden for the general population due to the COVID-19 pandemic has been highlighted. Evidence on effective, easily accessible public health interventions to reduce worry, a major transdiagnostic risk-factor for, e.g., anxiety and depression, is scarce. Objective: In a pragmatic randomized controlled trial, we aimed to assess whether an internet cognitive-behavioral self-help intervention could reduce worry more than public mental health advice in the general population. Methods: Eligible internet users above the age of 18 were recruited from the German general population and randomly assigned, to either get.calm-move.on (GCMO), a 10-day unguided, internet-based self-help intervention, or mental health advice waiting group (MHA-W, receiving officially endorsed mental health recommendations). The primary outcome was level of worry, using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), 2 weeks after randomization. Baseline assessment and 2-month and 6-month follow-ups were conducted. The trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00021153). Results: Between April 7, 2020 and December 11, 2020, we randomly assigned 351 individuals to receive either GCMO (n = 175) or MHA-W (n = 176). Participants receiving GCMO (PSWQ = 46.6; change -10.3) reported significantly less worrying at post-intervention (F1,219 = 12.9; p < 0.001; d = 0.38) than MHA-W controls (PSWQ = 51.6; change -5.1). Improvements were also seen on most secondary outcomes, including symptoms of anxiety and depression, general well-being, resiliency, and emotion regulation skills. Improvements made from baseline were stable until the 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: This internet-based self-help intervention providing cognitive-behavioral techniques to cope with the threatening pandemic situation is effective in reducing worry in the general population and should complement existing and potentially effective mental health recommendations. ",
keywords = "COVID-19, Internet-based intervention, Randomized controlled trial, Self-help, Worry, Health sciences",
author = "Hanna Heckendorf and Dirk Lehr and Leif Bo{\ss}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1159/000521302",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "398--410",
journal = "Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics",
issn = "0033-3190",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of an Internet-Based Self-Help Intervention versus Public Mental Health Advice to Reduce Worry during the COVID-19 Pandemic

T2 - A Pragmatic, Parallel-Group, Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Heckendorf, Hanna

AU - Lehr, Dirk

AU - Boß, Leif

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

PY - 2022/11/1

Y1 - 2022/11/1

N2 - Introduction: The mental health burden for the general population due to the COVID-19 pandemic has been highlighted. Evidence on effective, easily accessible public health interventions to reduce worry, a major transdiagnostic risk-factor for, e.g., anxiety and depression, is scarce. Objective: In a pragmatic randomized controlled trial, we aimed to assess whether an internet cognitive-behavioral self-help intervention could reduce worry more than public mental health advice in the general population. Methods: Eligible internet users above the age of 18 were recruited from the German general population and randomly assigned, to either get.calm-move.on (GCMO), a 10-day unguided, internet-based self-help intervention, or mental health advice waiting group (MHA-W, receiving officially endorsed mental health recommendations). The primary outcome was level of worry, using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), 2 weeks after randomization. Baseline assessment and 2-month and 6-month follow-ups were conducted. The trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00021153). Results: Between April 7, 2020 and December 11, 2020, we randomly assigned 351 individuals to receive either GCMO (n = 175) or MHA-W (n = 176). Participants receiving GCMO (PSWQ = 46.6; change -10.3) reported significantly less worrying at post-intervention (F1,219 = 12.9; p < 0.001; d = 0.38) than MHA-W controls (PSWQ = 51.6; change -5.1). Improvements were also seen on most secondary outcomes, including symptoms of anxiety and depression, general well-being, resiliency, and emotion regulation skills. Improvements made from baseline were stable until the 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: This internet-based self-help intervention providing cognitive-behavioral techniques to cope with the threatening pandemic situation is effective in reducing worry in the general population and should complement existing and potentially effective mental health recommendations.

AB - Introduction: The mental health burden for the general population due to the COVID-19 pandemic has been highlighted. Evidence on effective, easily accessible public health interventions to reduce worry, a major transdiagnostic risk-factor for, e.g., anxiety and depression, is scarce. Objective: In a pragmatic randomized controlled trial, we aimed to assess whether an internet cognitive-behavioral self-help intervention could reduce worry more than public mental health advice in the general population. Methods: Eligible internet users above the age of 18 were recruited from the German general population and randomly assigned, to either get.calm-move.on (GCMO), a 10-day unguided, internet-based self-help intervention, or mental health advice waiting group (MHA-W, receiving officially endorsed mental health recommendations). The primary outcome was level of worry, using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), 2 weeks after randomization. Baseline assessment and 2-month and 6-month follow-ups were conducted. The trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00021153). Results: Between April 7, 2020 and December 11, 2020, we randomly assigned 351 individuals to receive either GCMO (n = 175) or MHA-W (n = 176). Participants receiving GCMO (PSWQ = 46.6; change -10.3) reported significantly less worrying at post-intervention (F1,219 = 12.9; p < 0.001; d = 0.38) than MHA-W controls (PSWQ = 51.6; change -5.1). Improvements were also seen on most secondary outcomes, including symptoms of anxiety and depression, general well-being, resiliency, and emotion regulation skills. Improvements made from baseline were stable until the 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: This internet-based self-help intervention providing cognitive-behavioral techniques to cope with the threatening pandemic situation is effective in reducing worry in the general population and should complement existing and potentially effective mental health recommendations.

KW - COVID-19

KW - Internet-based intervention

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - Self-help

KW - Worry

KW - Health sciences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124085739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000521302

DO - 10.1159/000521302

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 35051939

AN - SCOPUS:85124085739

VL - 91

SP - 398

EP - 410

JO - Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

JF - Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

SN - 0033-3190

IS - 6

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. A Kinetic Approach to the study of Ideal Multipole Resonance Probe
  2. Regionalism and Diffusion Revisited
  3. AmQA
  4. Transformative learning in the field of sustainability: a systematic literature review (1999-2019)
  5. § 63 Geheimhaltung und Datenschutz
  6. Moving beyond abundance distributions
  7. Transformative research for sustainability
  8. Snowdrops in West Philadelphia
  9. The current challenges of liability for loss of satellite-based services
  10. Influence of three different balance shoes on EMG-activity during walking
  11. An Estimation of the Total Benefit Value of the British Countryside for Recreational Activities
  12. The Availability of Things
  13. Teachers' beliefs about and dispositions towards Inquiry-based Science Education
  14. Action, Adventure, Desire
  15. Individuelle oder kollektive Unternehmensführung?
  16. Discursive Tropes of Aggression Against Queer-Sexuality in Nigerian Standup Comedy
  17. The Return of the Plague of Ornaments
  18. Linking transitions to sustainability
  19. Upheaval in the Depot’s Wake
  20. §13 Grundlagen der Zusammenarbeit
  21. Assistenz für wen?
  22. Interlanguage pragmatics: From use to acquisition to second language pedagogy
  23. Das Licht, das Auge und die Identität der Farbe
  24. Absicht zur Erwerbstätigkeit im (zukünftigen) Ruhestand
  25. Helmut Schelsky: Ein öffentlicher „(Anti-)Soziologe“
  26. Transferring sustainability solutions across contexts through city-university partnerships
  27. Reisen als Möglichkeit eines Anderssein-Könnens
  28. Vorwort
  29. The Relationship Between Theory and Practice in Vocational Education:
  30. Praxisorientierte Weiterbildung zu nachhaltiger Regionalentwicklung
  31. Manuela Leinhoß
  32. Ǐnci Dirim / Anke Wegner (Hrsg.): Normative Grundlagen und reflexive Verortungen im Feld DaF_DaZ*
  33. Rapid Rise in the Groundwater after Heavy Rain