Effectiveness of an Internet- and App-Based Intervention for College Students With Elevated Stress: Randomized Controlled Trial

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Effectiveness of an Internet- and App-Based Intervention for College Students With Elevated Stress: Randomized Controlled Trial. / Harrer, Mathias; Adam, Sophia Helen; Fleischmann, Rebecca Jessica et al.
In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 20, No. 4, e136, 23.04.2018.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Harrer, M, Adam, SH, Fleischmann, RJ, Baumeister, H, Auerbach, R, Bruffaerts, R, Cuijpers, P, Kessler, RC, Berking, M, Lehr, D & Ebert, DD 2018, 'Effectiveness of an Internet- and App-Based Intervention for College Students With Elevated Stress: Randomized Controlled Trial', Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 20, no. 4, e136. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9293

APA

Harrer, M., Adam, S. H., Fleischmann, R. J., Baumeister, H., Auerbach, R., Bruffaerts, R., Cuijpers, P., Kessler, R. C., Berking, M., Lehr, D., & Ebert, D. D. (2018). Effectiveness of an Internet- and App-Based Intervention for College Students With Elevated Stress: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(4), Article e136. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9293

Vancouver

Harrer M, Adam SH, Fleischmann RJ, Baumeister H, Auerbach R, Bruffaerts R et al. Effectiveness of an Internet- and App-Based Intervention for College Students With Elevated Stress: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2018 Apr 23;20(4):e136. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9293

Bibtex

@article{6af4c501db934c49952751931ac64bd1,
title = "Effectiveness of an Internet- and App-Based Intervention for College Students With Elevated Stress: Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Background: Mental health problems are highly prevalent among college students. Most students with poor mental health, however, do not receive professional help. Internet-based self-help formats may increase the utilization of treatment. Objective: The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of an internet-based, app-supported stress management intervention for college students. Methods: College students (n=150) with elevated levels of stress (Perceived Stress Scale 4-item version, PSS-4 =8) were randomly assigned to either an internet- and mobile-based stress intervention group with feedback on demand or a waitlist control group. Self-report data were assessed at baseline, posttreatment (7 weeks), and 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was perceived stress posttreatment (PSS-4). Secondary outcomes included mental health outcomes, modifiable risk and protective factors, and college-related outcomes. Subgroup analyses were conducted in students with clinically relevant symptoms of depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies' Depression Scale >17). Results: A total of 106 participants (76.8%) indicated that they were first-time help-seekers, and 77.3% (intervention group: 58/75; waitlist control group: 58/75) showed clinically relevant depressive symptoms at baseline. Findings indicated significant effects of the intervention compared with the waitlist control group for stress (d=0.69; 95% CI 0.36-1.02), anxiety (d=0.76; 95% CI 0.43-1.09), depression (d=0.63; 95% CI 0.30-0.96), college-related productivity (d=0.33; 95% CI 0.01-0.65), academic work impairment (d=0.34; 95% CI 0.01-0.66), and other outcomes after 7 weeks (posttreatment). Response rates for stress symptoms were significantly higher for the intervention group (69%, 52/75) compared with the waitlist control group (35%, 26/75, P<.001; number needed to treat=2.89, 95% CI 2.01-5.08) at posttest (7 weeks). Effects were sustained at 3-month follow-up, and similar findings emerged in students with symptoms of depression. Conclusions: Internet- and mobile-based interventions could be an effective and cost-effective approach to reduce consequences of college-related stress and might potentially attract students with clinically relevant depression who would not otherwise seek help. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00010212; http://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do? navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00010212 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6w55Ewhjd).",
keywords = "randomized controlled trial, stress, psychological, depression, telemedicine, students, help-seeking behavior, Psychology",
author = "Mathias Harrer and Adam, {Sophia Helen} and Fleischmann, {Rebecca Jessica} and Harald Baumeister and Randy Auerbach and Ronny Bruffaerts and Pim Cuijpers and Kessler, {Ronald C.} and Matthias Berking and Dirk Lehr and Ebert, {David Daniel}",
note = "Funding Information: The study was partly funded by BARMER, a major health care insurance company in Germany. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Mathias Harrer, Sophia Helen Adam, Rebecca Jessica Fleischmann, Harald Baumeister, Randy Auerbach, Ronny Bruffaerts, Pim Cuijpers, Ronald C Kessler, Matthias Berking, Dirk Lehr, David Daniel Ebert.",
year = "2018",
month = apr,
day = "23",
doi = "10.2196/jmir.9293",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "JMIR Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of an Internet- and App-Based Intervention for College Students With Elevated Stress

T2 - Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Harrer, Mathias

AU - Adam, Sophia Helen

AU - Fleischmann, Rebecca Jessica

AU - Baumeister, Harald

AU - Auerbach, Randy

AU - Bruffaerts, Ronny

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Kessler, Ronald C.

AU - Berking, Matthias

AU - Lehr, Dirk

AU - Ebert, David Daniel

N1 - Funding Information: The study was partly funded by BARMER, a major health care insurance company in Germany. Publisher Copyright: © Mathias Harrer, Sophia Helen Adam, Rebecca Jessica Fleischmann, Harald Baumeister, Randy Auerbach, Ronny Bruffaerts, Pim Cuijpers, Ronald C Kessler, Matthias Berking, Dirk Lehr, David Daniel Ebert.

PY - 2018/4/23

Y1 - 2018/4/23

N2 - Background: Mental health problems are highly prevalent among college students. Most students with poor mental health, however, do not receive professional help. Internet-based self-help formats may increase the utilization of treatment. Objective: The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of an internet-based, app-supported stress management intervention for college students. Methods: College students (n=150) with elevated levels of stress (Perceived Stress Scale 4-item version, PSS-4 =8) were randomly assigned to either an internet- and mobile-based stress intervention group with feedback on demand or a waitlist control group. Self-report data were assessed at baseline, posttreatment (7 weeks), and 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was perceived stress posttreatment (PSS-4). Secondary outcomes included mental health outcomes, modifiable risk and protective factors, and college-related outcomes. Subgroup analyses were conducted in students with clinically relevant symptoms of depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies' Depression Scale >17). Results: A total of 106 participants (76.8%) indicated that they were first-time help-seekers, and 77.3% (intervention group: 58/75; waitlist control group: 58/75) showed clinically relevant depressive symptoms at baseline. Findings indicated significant effects of the intervention compared with the waitlist control group for stress (d=0.69; 95% CI 0.36-1.02), anxiety (d=0.76; 95% CI 0.43-1.09), depression (d=0.63; 95% CI 0.30-0.96), college-related productivity (d=0.33; 95% CI 0.01-0.65), academic work impairment (d=0.34; 95% CI 0.01-0.66), and other outcomes after 7 weeks (posttreatment). Response rates for stress symptoms were significantly higher for the intervention group (69%, 52/75) compared with the waitlist control group (35%, 26/75, P<.001; number needed to treat=2.89, 95% CI 2.01-5.08) at posttest (7 weeks). Effects were sustained at 3-month follow-up, and similar findings emerged in students with symptoms of depression. Conclusions: Internet- and mobile-based interventions could be an effective and cost-effective approach to reduce consequences of college-related stress and might potentially attract students with clinically relevant depression who would not otherwise seek help. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00010212; http://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do? navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00010212 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6w55Ewhjd).

AB - Background: Mental health problems are highly prevalent among college students. Most students with poor mental health, however, do not receive professional help. Internet-based self-help formats may increase the utilization of treatment. Objective: The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of an internet-based, app-supported stress management intervention for college students. Methods: College students (n=150) with elevated levels of stress (Perceived Stress Scale 4-item version, PSS-4 =8) were randomly assigned to either an internet- and mobile-based stress intervention group with feedback on demand or a waitlist control group. Self-report data were assessed at baseline, posttreatment (7 weeks), and 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was perceived stress posttreatment (PSS-4). Secondary outcomes included mental health outcomes, modifiable risk and protective factors, and college-related outcomes. Subgroup analyses were conducted in students with clinically relevant symptoms of depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies' Depression Scale >17). Results: A total of 106 participants (76.8%) indicated that they were first-time help-seekers, and 77.3% (intervention group: 58/75; waitlist control group: 58/75) showed clinically relevant depressive symptoms at baseline. Findings indicated significant effects of the intervention compared with the waitlist control group for stress (d=0.69; 95% CI 0.36-1.02), anxiety (d=0.76; 95% CI 0.43-1.09), depression (d=0.63; 95% CI 0.30-0.96), college-related productivity (d=0.33; 95% CI 0.01-0.65), academic work impairment (d=0.34; 95% CI 0.01-0.66), and other outcomes after 7 weeks (posttreatment). Response rates for stress symptoms were significantly higher for the intervention group (69%, 52/75) compared with the waitlist control group (35%, 26/75, P<.001; number needed to treat=2.89, 95% CI 2.01-5.08) at posttest (7 weeks). Effects were sustained at 3-month follow-up, and similar findings emerged in students with symptoms of depression. Conclusions: Internet- and mobile-based interventions could be an effective and cost-effective approach to reduce consequences of college-related stress and might potentially attract students with clinically relevant depression who would not otherwise seek help. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00010212; http://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do? navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00010212 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6w55Ewhjd).

KW - randomized controlled trial

KW - stress

KW - psychological

KW - depression

KW - telemedicine

KW - students

KW - help-seeking behavior

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047549982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/jmir.9293

DO - 10.2196/jmir.9293

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 29685870

VL - 20

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 4

M1 - e136

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Edward Lear, A book of nonsense
  2. Modeling Turning Points In Global Equity Market
  3. Performativity, performance studies and digital cultures
  4. Future work
  5. Changing learning environments at university?
  6. Explaining age and gender differences in employment rates
  7. Mechanisms behind elevational plant species richness patterns revealed by a trait-based approach
  8. 2D QSAR of PPARγ agonist binding and transactivation.
  9. Komparative studier i børnelitterature
  10. The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management
  11. Die Unterwerfung
  12. A new and benign hegemon on the horizon?
  13. A target costing approach to developing an online distribution channel
  14. Radicalisation of ‘lone actors’
  15. Healthier and Sustainable Food Systems: Integrating Underutilised Crops in a ‘Theory of Change Approach’
  16. Dynamicland
  17. Non-audit fees of the external auditor, audit committees and earnings quality : An empirical analysis of German (non) listed firms
  18. Theorising the dynamics of collaborative consumption practices
  19. Functional domains of business incubators for refugee entrepreneurs
  20. Can radicals get a seat on the negotiation table? A Dynamic Perspective on Legitimation Processes.
  21. The effectiveness of interventions during and after residence in women’s shelters
  22. The Career Engagement Scale: Development and validation of a measure of proactive career behaviors
  23. § 44 VwGO (Objektive Klagehäufung)
  24. Der extrovertierte Rechtstaat
  25. Integrative Management of Sustainability Performance, Measurement and Reporting
  26. Ideological Stances in Yoruba Nation Secessionist Discourse in Nigerian Virtual Communities
  27. Students' Time Allocation and School Performance
  28. Effect of Deformation Speed on Stress Corrosion and Fracture Toughness of Extruded Mg10Dy and Mg10Dy1Nd Using C-Ring Tests
  29. Development from the Margins
  30. New methods for the analysis of links between international firm activities and firm performance
  31. Beyond the “local”
  32. Das Langzeitpraktikum in Corona-Zeiten
  33. Cycling at varying load
  34. The effects of pre-intervention mindset induction on a brief intervention to increase risk perception and reduce alcohol use among university students
  35. Using structure biodegradability relationships for environmentally benign design of organosilicons – An experimental comparison of organosilicons and their carbon analogues
  36. Technology management and collaboration profile: virtual companies and industrial platforms in the high-tech biotechnology industries