Democratic Stress and Political Institutions: Drives of Reforms of Bicameralism in Times of Crisis
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Representation. Journal of Representative Democracy, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2022, p. 85-102.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Democratic Stress and Political Institutions
T2 - Drives of Reforms of Bicameralism in Times of Crisis
AU - Vercesi, Michelangelo
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 McDougall Trust, London.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Traditional patterns of political participation and party representation in Europe have been put to the test by the so-called crisis of representative democracy: mainstream parties have been perceived as more unfit to govern; the level of electoral participation has decreased; and voters have shown increasing dissatisfaction with representative institutions. In several cases, these changes have pushed governing elites to (seek to) redefine the ‘rules’ of the political process, in response to the challenges posed by new party contesters. In particular, in different European countries political actors have stressed the need to undermine the role of second chambers as veto players. This article focuses on both successful and failed attempts of reforms of bicameralism between 2006 and 2016 in seven EU countries (Belgium; Germany; Ireland; Italy; Romania; Spain; UK). It tries (1) to understand if political elites in Europe have pursued parliamentary reforms as a reaction to ‘democratic stress’ and (2) to single out the circumstances of success and failures. A discussion of the detectable trends of institutional reforms during democratic crises and some tentative explanations are finally provided
AB - Traditional patterns of political participation and party representation in Europe have been put to the test by the so-called crisis of representative democracy: mainstream parties have been perceived as more unfit to govern; the level of electoral participation has decreased; and voters have shown increasing dissatisfaction with representative institutions. In several cases, these changes have pushed governing elites to (seek to) redefine the ‘rules’ of the political process, in response to the challenges posed by new party contesters. In particular, in different European countries political actors have stressed the need to undermine the role of second chambers as veto players. This article focuses on both successful and failed attempts of reforms of bicameralism between 2006 and 2016 in seven EU countries (Belgium; Germany; Ireland; Italy; Romania; Spain; UK). It tries (1) to understand if political elites in Europe have pursued parliamentary reforms as a reaction to ‘democratic stress’ and (2) to single out the circumstances of success and failures. A discussion of the detectable trends of institutional reforms during democratic crises and some tentative explanations are finally provided
KW - Politics
KW - Second parliamentary chambers
KW - party democracy
KW - Constitutional reform
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068639412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00344893.2019.1635195
DO - 10.1080/00344893.2019.1635195
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 58
SP - 85
EP - 102
JO - Representation. Journal of Representative Democracy
JF - Representation. Journal of Representative Democracy
SN - 0034-4893
IS - 1
ER -