Democratic Stress and Political Institutions: Drives of Reforms of Bicameralism in Times of Crisis

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Democratic Stress and Political Institutions: Drives of Reforms of Bicameralism in Times of Crisis . / Vercesi, Michelangelo.
In: Representation. Journal of Representative Democracy, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2022, p. 85-102.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{64a84303924545cc92863bbc40cc72d9,
title = "Democratic Stress and Political Institutions: Drives of Reforms of Bicameralism in Times of Crisis ",
abstract = "Traditional patterns of political participation and party representation in Europe have been put to the test by the so-called crisis of representative democracy: mainstream parties have been perceived as more unfit to govern; the level of electoral participation has decreased; and voters have shown increasing dissatisfaction with representative institutions. In several cases, these changes have pushed governing elites to (seek to) redefine the {\textquoteleft}rules{\textquoteright} of the political process, in response to the challenges posed by new party contesters. In particular, in different European countries political actors have stressed the need to undermine the role of second chambers as veto players. This article focuses on both successful and failed attempts of reforms of bicameralism between 2006 and 2016 in seven EU countries (Belgium; Germany; Ireland; Italy; Romania; Spain; UK). It tries (1) to understand if political elites in Europe have pursued parliamentary reforms as a reaction to {\textquoteleft}democratic stress{\textquoteright} and (2) to single out the circumstances of success and failures. A discussion of the detectable trends of institutional reforms during democratic crises and some tentative explanations are finally provided",
keywords = "Politics, Second parliamentary chambers, party democracy, Constitutional reform",
author = "Michelangelo Vercesi",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 McDougall Trust, London.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/00344893.2019.1635195",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "85--102",
journal = "Representation. Journal of Representative Democracy",
issn = "0034-4893",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Democratic Stress and Political Institutions

T2 - Drives of Reforms of Bicameralism in Times of Crisis

AU - Vercesi, Michelangelo

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 McDougall Trust, London.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Traditional patterns of political participation and party representation in Europe have been put to the test by the so-called crisis of representative democracy: mainstream parties have been perceived as more unfit to govern; the level of electoral participation has decreased; and voters have shown increasing dissatisfaction with representative institutions. In several cases, these changes have pushed governing elites to (seek to) redefine the ‘rules’ of the political process, in response to the challenges posed by new party contesters. In particular, in different European countries political actors have stressed the need to undermine the role of second chambers as veto players. This article focuses on both successful and failed attempts of reforms of bicameralism between 2006 and 2016 in seven EU countries (Belgium; Germany; Ireland; Italy; Romania; Spain; UK). It tries (1) to understand if political elites in Europe have pursued parliamentary reforms as a reaction to ‘democratic stress’ and (2) to single out the circumstances of success and failures. A discussion of the detectable trends of institutional reforms during democratic crises and some tentative explanations are finally provided

AB - Traditional patterns of political participation and party representation in Europe have been put to the test by the so-called crisis of representative democracy: mainstream parties have been perceived as more unfit to govern; the level of electoral participation has decreased; and voters have shown increasing dissatisfaction with representative institutions. In several cases, these changes have pushed governing elites to (seek to) redefine the ‘rules’ of the political process, in response to the challenges posed by new party contesters. In particular, in different European countries political actors have stressed the need to undermine the role of second chambers as veto players. This article focuses on both successful and failed attempts of reforms of bicameralism between 2006 and 2016 in seven EU countries (Belgium; Germany; Ireland; Italy; Romania; Spain; UK). It tries (1) to understand if political elites in Europe have pursued parliamentary reforms as a reaction to ‘democratic stress’ and (2) to single out the circumstances of success and failures. A discussion of the detectable trends of institutional reforms during democratic crises and some tentative explanations are finally provided

KW - Politics

KW - Second parliamentary chambers

KW - party democracy

KW - Constitutional reform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068639412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00344893.2019.1635195

DO - 10.1080/00344893.2019.1635195

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 58

SP - 85

EP - 102

JO - Representation. Journal of Representative Democracy

JF - Representation. Journal of Representative Democracy

SN - 0034-4893

IS - 1

ER -