Cabinets and Decision-Making Processes: Re-Assessing the Literature

Michelangelo Vercesi

Cabinets and Decision-Making Processes: Re-Assessing the Literature

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Standard

Cabinets and Decision-Making Processes: Re-Assessing the Literature. / Vercesi, Michelangelo.
In: Journal of Comparative Politics, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2012, p. 4-27.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Bibtex

@article{83f2af39230d4885ba3fcae0668ad7e7,

title = "Cabinets and Decision-Making Processes: Re-Assessing the Literature",

abstract = "When it comes to illustrate how cabinets work and to classify them, one very promising way is to look at their internal decision-making processes. In this paper, I give a comprehensive picture of cabinets in parliamentary and semi-presidential systems on this basis. In particular, in the first part, I review what the literature has proposed in this respect. Secondly, after illustrating some shortcomings of the works at issue, I revise a famous Andeweg{\textquoteright}s proposal, providing an amended typology of cabinets based on two dimensions. For each of the eight ideal-types stemming from it, some empirical examples are illustrated",

keywords = "Politics, Cabinet, Decision-Making, Typology, Prime Minister, Executive",

author = "Michelangelo Vercesi",

year = "2012",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

pages = "4--27",

journal = "Journal of Comparative Politics",

issn = "1338-1385",

publisher = "University of Ljubljana",

number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cabinets and Decision-Making Processes

T2 - Re-Assessing the Literature

AU - Vercesi, Michelangelo

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - When it comes to illustrate how cabinets work and to classify them, one very promising way is to look at their internal decision-making processes. In this paper, I give a comprehensive picture of cabinets in parliamentary and semi-presidential systems on this basis. In particular, in the first part, I review what the literature has proposed in this respect. Secondly, after illustrating some shortcomings of the works at issue, I revise a famous Andeweg’s proposal, providing an amended typology of cabinets based on two dimensions. For each of the eight ideal-types stemming from it, some empirical examples are illustrated

AB - When it comes to illustrate how cabinets work and to classify them, one very promising way is to look at their internal decision-making processes. In this paper, I give a comprehensive picture of cabinets in parliamentary and semi-presidential systems on this basis. In particular, in the first part, I review what the literature has proposed in this respect. Secondly, after illustrating some shortcomings of the works at issue, I revise a famous Andeweg’s proposal, providing an amended typology of cabinets based on two dimensions. For each of the eight ideal-types stemming from it, some empirical examples are illustrated

KW - Politics

KW - Cabinet

KW - Decision-Making

KW - Typology

KW - Prime Minister

KW - Executive

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 5

SP - 4

EP - 27

JO - Journal of Comparative Politics

JF - Journal of Comparative Politics

SN - 1338-1385

IS - 2

ER -