Board Ancestral Diversity and Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Emission Disclosure
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: British Journal of Management, Vol. 35, No. 3, 07.2024, p. 1512-1529.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Board Ancestral Diversity and Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Emission Disclosure
AU - Barg, Johannes A.
AU - Drobetz, Wolfgang
AU - El Ghoul, Sadok
AU - Guedhami, Omrane
AU - Schröder, Henning
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. British Journal of Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Academy of Management.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - This paper examines the relationship between board diversity and firms’ decisions to voluntarily disclose information about their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. We focus on board ancestral diversity as a relatively new dimension of (deep-level) board structure and document that it has a positive and statistically significant effect on a firm's scope and quality of voluntary GHG emission disclosure. The effect goes beyond the impact of more common (surface-level) dimensions of board diversity and remains robust after addressing endogeneity concerns. In line with the theoretical conjecture that diversity enhances a board's advising and monitoring capacity, we find that the impact of diverse boards is stronger in more complex firms and in firms with low levels of institutional ownership. Overall, our findings provide evidence for board diversity being a relevant governance factor in corporate environmental decision making.
AB - This paper examines the relationship between board diversity and firms’ decisions to voluntarily disclose information about their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. We focus on board ancestral diversity as a relatively new dimension of (deep-level) board structure and document that it has a positive and statistically significant effect on a firm's scope and quality of voluntary GHG emission disclosure. The effect goes beyond the impact of more common (surface-level) dimensions of board diversity and remains robust after addressing endogeneity concerns. In line with the theoretical conjecture that diversity enhances a board's advising and monitoring capacity, we find that the impact of diverse boards is stronger in more complex firms and in firms with low levels of institutional ownership. Overall, our findings provide evidence for board diversity being a relevant governance factor in corporate environmental decision making.
KW - Management studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177234265&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5da3c4f8-6e31-3531-b2ac-95f540b5e2ae/
U2 - 10.1111/1467-8551.12778
DO - 10.1111/1467-8551.12778
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85177234265
VL - 35
SP - 1512
EP - 1529
JO - British Journal of Management
JF - British Journal of Management
SN - 1045-3172
IS - 3
ER -