Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters

Research output: Journal contributionsComments / Debate / ReportsResearch

Authors

  • Aníbal Pauchard
  • Laura A. Meyerson
  • Sven Bacher
  • Tim M. Blackburn
  • Giuseppe Brundu
  • Marc W. Cadotte
  • Franck Courchamp
  • Franz Essl
  • Piero Genovesi
  • Nick D. Holmes
  • Philip E. Hulme
  • Jonathan M. Jeschke
  • Julie L. Lockwood
  • Ana Novoa
  • Martin A. Nuñez
  • Duane A. Peltzer
  • Petr Pyšek
  • David M. Richardson
  • Daniel Simberloff
  • Kevin Smith
  • Brian W. van Wilgen
  • Montserrat Vilà
  • John R.U. Wilson
  • Marten Winter
  • Rafael D. Zenni
Recent global efforts in biodiversity accounting, such as those undertaken through the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), are vital if we are to track conservation progress, ensure that we can address the challenges of global change, and develop powerful and scientifically sound indicators. Schlaepfer [1] proposes that we should work toward inventories of biodiversity that account for native and non-native species regardless of species origin and ecological context. We strongly disagree with the approach of combining counts of native and non-native species because this will reduce our capacity to detect the effects of non-native spe-
cies on native biodiversity with potentially devastating consequences. Compelling and abundant evidence demonstrates that some non-native species can become invasive and produce major ecosystem disruptions and even native species extinction. Unfortunately, we still cannot be certain which non-native species will be the most detrimental (e.g., [2]). Combining native and non-native species together into a single biodiversity index would not only inflate biodiversity estimates and risk promoting the spread of invasive non-native species but would also ignore the fundamental ecological differences between the two groups. The critical differences
that should be considered when assessing biodiversity include the following.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2006686
JournalPLoS Biology
Volume16
Issue number11
Number of pages4
ISSN1544-9173
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13.11.2018
Externally publishedYes

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Messung von Lehrerexpertise in der Klassenführung: Diskussion.
  2. The German Assisted Return Regime – an interpretive approach
  3. “Staging Venice (as protagonist?) – Max Reinhardt’s Merchant of Venice (1905-1934)”.
  4. Issues in Contemporary Marxism. Marx between Spinoza and the Nietzsche-Heideggerian Legacy
  5. Sustainability in education: Master Management & Sustainable Accounting and Finance
  6. IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control Education - ACE 2016
  7. European Group for Organizational Studies (Externe Organisation)
  8. A Modernist in Exile. The International Reception of H. G. Adler
  9. Unterrichtsqualität durch Bildungsstandards - Utopie oder Wirklichkeit?
  10. 24th PhD Summer School on Political Parties in New Democracies
  11. Science and politics: the changeful relations between France and Germany by the example of child and adolescent psychiatry
  12. Analyse & Kritik (Fachzeitschrift)
  13. European Center on Space Law (Externe Organisation)
  14. Responsible Supply Chains and Networks: Challenges for Governance and Sustainability 2012
  15. Digitale Vortragsreihe: Troubling Childhoods?
  16. Arlene Raven: Collaborative Writing as Feminist Strategy: Session 13 – Having Words: Artist-writer relationships
  17. Pierre Bourdieus Rechtsdenken: die Integration von sozialstruktureller und kulturtheoretischer Perspektive
  18. Vom Regieren der Affekte und ihrer medientechnischen Zurichtung
  19. Unternehmensstrategische Ebene der ESG-Berichterstattung: Implikationen für Geschäftsmodelle, Interne Kontrollsysteme und Risikomanagementsysteme
  20. Postervortrag: Vorstellungen von Schüler_innen der Sekundarstufe I zur Energiewende
  21. Conference - 7th Global Meeting on Law & Society
  22. E-Portfolios as opportunities to reflect: Unterschiede zwischen Form und Medium der Reflexion.