Between mutuality, autonomy and domination: Rethinking digital platforms as contested relational structures
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.10.2021, p. 1217-1243.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Between mutuality, autonomy and domination
T2 - Rethinking digital platforms as contested relational structures
AU - Schüßler, Elke
AU - Attwood-Charles, Will
AU - Kirchner, Stefan
AU - Schor, Juliet B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: VC The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - This Special Issue advances a new understanding of digital platforms as dynamic and relational. An archetypal transaction platform, we argue, is comprised of three canonical social relationships which exist in tension with each other. The first is mutuality—the practices of sharing and reciprocity which animated the early days of the ‘sharing economy’. The second is autonomy—representing the desire for freedom and independence attracting many earners to platforms. The third is domination—the exercise of power and control which drives many platform owners and managers. As we argue below, these three social relationships are present in varying degrees on all platforms. By conceptualizing platforms as contested relational structures, we aim to bridge prior attempts to classify ‘what platforms are’ with diverse empirical studies of ‘what platforms do’ in different contexts. In our view, platforms can do different things at the same time because they are different things at the same time.
AB - This Special Issue advances a new understanding of digital platforms as dynamic and relational. An archetypal transaction platform, we argue, is comprised of three canonical social relationships which exist in tension with each other. The first is mutuality—the practices of sharing and reciprocity which animated the early days of the ‘sharing economy’. The second is autonomy—representing the desire for freedom and independence attracting many earners to platforms. The third is domination—the exercise of power and control which drives many platform owners and managers. As we argue below, these three social relationships are present in varying degrees on all platforms. By conceptualizing platforms as contested relational structures, we aim to bridge prior attempts to classify ‘what platforms are’ with diverse empirical studies of ‘what platforms do’ in different contexts. In our view, platforms can do different things at the same time because they are different things at the same time.
KW - Management studies
KW - Capitalism
KW - Digital platforms
KW - Labour markets
KW - Political economy
KW - Social order
KW - Technological change
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116123558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8cadbadd-c996-325a-9430-6af10baf76eb/
U2 - 10.1093/ser/mwab038
DO - 10.1093/ser/mwab038
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85116123558
VL - 19
SP - 1217
EP - 1243
JO - Socio-Economic Review
JF - Socio-Economic Review
SN - 1475-1461
IS - 4
ER -