Between mutuality, autonomy and domination: Rethinking digital platforms as contested relational structures

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Between mutuality, autonomy and domination: Rethinking digital platforms as contested relational structures. / Schüßler, Elke; Attwood-Charles, Will; Kirchner, Stefan et al.
in: Socio-Economic Review, Jahrgang 19, Nr. 4, 01.10.2021, S. 1217-1243.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Schüßler E, Attwood-Charles W, Kirchner S, Schor JB. Between mutuality, autonomy and domination: Rethinking digital platforms as contested relational structures. Socio-Economic Review. 2021 Okt 1;19(4):1217-1243. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwab038

Bibtex

@article{af5c3841ccfa4b779cadec506c653a59,
title = "Between mutuality, autonomy and domination: Rethinking digital platforms as contested relational structures",
abstract = "This Special Issue advances a new understanding of digital platforms as dynamic and relational. An archetypal transaction platform, we argue, is comprised of three canonical social relationships which exist in tension with each other. The first is mutuality—the practices of sharing and reciprocity which animated the early days of the {\textquoteleft}sharing economy{\textquoteright}. The second is autonomy—representing the desire for freedom and independence attracting many earners to platforms. The third is domination—the exercise of power and control which drives many platform owners and managers. As we argue below, these three social relationships are present in varying degrees on all platforms. By conceptualizing platforms as contested relational structures, we aim to bridge prior attempts to classify {\textquoteleft}what platforms are{\textquoteright} with diverse empirical studies of {\textquoteleft}what platforms do{\textquoteright} in different contexts. In our view, platforms can do different things at the same time because they are different things at the same time.",
keywords = "Management studies, Capitalism, Digital platforms, Labour markets, Political economy, Social order, Technological change",
author = "Elke Sch{\"u}{\ss}ler and Will Attwood-Charles and Stefan Kirchner and Schor, {Juliet B.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: VC The Author(s) 2021.",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ser/mwab038",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1217--1243",
journal = "Socio-Economic Review",
issn = "1475-1461",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between mutuality, autonomy and domination

T2 - Rethinking digital platforms as contested relational structures

AU - Schüßler, Elke

AU - Attwood-Charles, Will

AU - Kirchner, Stefan

AU - Schor, Juliet B.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: VC The Author(s) 2021.

PY - 2021/10/1

Y1 - 2021/10/1

N2 - This Special Issue advances a new understanding of digital platforms as dynamic and relational. An archetypal transaction platform, we argue, is comprised of three canonical social relationships which exist in tension with each other. The first is mutuality—the practices of sharing and reciprocity which animated the early days of the ‘sharing economy’. The second is autonomy—representing the desire for freedom and independence attracting many earners to platforms. The third is domination—the exercise of power and control which drives many platform owners and managers. As we argue below, these three social relationships are present in varying degrees on all platforms. By conceptualizing platforms as contested relational structures, we aim to bridge prior attempts to classify ‘what platforms are’ with diverse empirical studies of ‘what platforms do’ in different contexts. In our view, platforms can do different things at the same time because they are different things at the same time.

AB - This Special Issue advances a new understanding of digital platforms as dynamic and relational. An archetypal transaction platform, we argue, is comprised of three canonical social relationships which exist in tension with each other. The first is mutuality—the practices of sharing and reciprocity which animated the early days of the ‘sharing economy’. The second is autonomy—representing the desire for freedom and independence attracting many earners to platforms. The third is domination—the exercise of power and control which drives many platform owners and managers. As we argue below, these three social relationships are present in varying degrees on all platforms. By conceptualizing platforms as contested relational structures, we aim to bridge prior attempts to classify ‘what platforms are’ with diverse empirical studies of ‘what platforms do’ in different contexts. In our view, platforms can do different things at the same time because they are different things at the same time.

KW - Management studies

KW - Capitalism

KW - Digital platforms

KW - Labour markets

KW - Political economy

KW - Social order

KW - Technological change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116123558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8cadbadd-c996-325a-9430-6af10baf76eb/

U2 - 10.1093/ser/mwab038

DO - 10.1093/ser/mwab038

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85116123558

VL - 19

SP - 1217

EP - 1243

JO - Socio-Economic Review

JF - Socio-Economic Review

SN - 1475-1461

IS - 4

ER -

DOI