1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publications
  5. Belief in Free Will Is Related to Intern...
  6. Output formats
  7. //

Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Standard

Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception. / Genschow, Oliver; Lange, Jens.
In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 13, No. 8, 01.11.2022, p. 1259-1268.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Genschow, O & Lange, J 2022, 'Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception', Social Psychological and Personality Science, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1259-1268. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211057711

APA

Genschow, O., & Lange, J. (2022). Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(8), 1259-1268. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211057711

Vancouver

Genschow O, Lange J. Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2022 Nov 1;13(8):1259-1268. doi: 10.1177/19485506211057711

Bibtex

@article{1ab85632f41d4ab4915bac306484ed58,
title = "Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception",
abstract = "Past research indicates that individuals{\textquoteright} belief in free will is related to attributing others{\textquoteright} behavior to internal causes. An open question is whether belief in free will is related to the attribution of one{\textquoteright}s own action. To answer this question, we tested two opposing predictions against each other by assessing the relation of belief in free will with the self-serving bias—individuals{\textquoteright} tendency to attribute personal success more strongly to internal forces and failure to external forces. The resource hypothesis predicts that a higher endorsement in free will belief relates to a lower self-serving bias. The intention attribution hypothesis predicts that belief in free will relates to higher internal attributions, as compared with external attributions, irrespective of success and failure. Meta-analytic evidence across five high-powered studies (total N = 1,137) supports the intention attribution hypothesis, but not the resource hypothesis (materials and data are available on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/2a89c/).",
keywords = "free will belief, intention attribution, self-regulation, self-serving bias, Business psychology",
author = "Oliver Genschow and Jens Lange",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2022.",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/19485506211057711",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1259--1268",
journal = "Social Psychological and Personality Science",
issn = "1948-5506",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Lange, Jens

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2022.

PY - 2022/11/1

Y1 - 2022/11/1

N2 - Past research indicates that individuals’ belief in free will is related to attributing others’ behavior to internal causes. An open question is whether belief in free will is related to the attribution of one’s own action. To answer this question, we tested two opposing predictions against each other by assessing the relation of belief in free will with the self-serving bias—individuals’ tendency to attribute personal success more strongly to internal forces and failure to external forces. The resource hypothesis predicts that a higher endorsement in free will belief relates to a lower self-serving bias. The intention attribution hypothesis predicts that belief in free will relates to higher internal attributions, as compared with external attributions, irrespective of success and failure. Meta-analytic evidence across five high-powered studies (total N = 1,137) supports the intention attribution hypothesis, but not the resource hypothesis (materials and data are available on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/2a89c/).

AB - Past research indicates that individuals’ belief in free will is related to attributing others’ behavior to internal causes. An open question is whether belief in free will is related to the attribution of one’s own action. To answer this question, we tested two opposing predictions against each other by assessing the relation of belief in free will with the self-serving bias—individuals’ tendency to attribute personal success more strongly to internal forces and failure to external forces. The resource hypothesis predicts that a higher endorsement in free will belief relates to a lower self-serving bias. The intention attribution hypothesis predicts that belief in free will relates to higher internal attributions, as compared with external attributions, irrespective of success and failure. Meta-analytic evidence across five high-powered studies (total N = 1,137) supports the intention attribution hypothesis, but not the resource hypothesis (materials and data are available on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/2a89c/).

KW - free will belief

KW - intention attribution

KW - self-regulation

KW - self-serving bias

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123941583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/63be21c8-3009-3944-bcae-0bbe3d340b87/

U2 - 10.1177/19485506211057711

DO - 10.1177/19485506211057711

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85123941583

VL - 13

SP - 1259

EP - 1268

JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science

JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science

SN - 1948-5506

IS - 8

ER -

Related by journal

Gendered Self-Views Across 62 Countries: A Test of Competing Models

Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Bosson, J. K., Jurek, P., Besta, T., Olech, M., Vandello, J. A., Bender, M., Dandy, J., Hoorens, V., Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Mankowski, E., Venäläinen, S., Abuhamdeh, S., Agyemang, C. B., Akbaş, G., Albayrak-Aydemir, N., Ammirati, S., Anderson, J., Anjum, G., Ariyanto, A., Aruta, J. J. B. R., Ashraf, M., Bakaitytė, A., Becker, M., Bertolli, C., Bërxulli, D., Best, D. L., Bi, C., Block, K., Boehnke, M., Bongiorno, R., Bosak, J., Casini, A., Chen, Q., Chi, P., Cubela Adoric, V., Daalmans, S., de Lemus, S., Dhakal, S., Dvorianchikov, N., Egami, S., Etchezahar, E., Esteves, C. S., Froehlich, L., Garcia-Sanchez, E., Gavreliuc, A., Gavreliuc, D., Gomez, Á., Guizzo, F., Graf, S., Greijdanus, H., Grigoryan, A., Grzymała-Moszczyńska, J., Guerch, K., Gustafsson Sendén, M., Hale, M. L., Hämer, H., Hirai, M., Hoang Duc, L., Hřebíčková, M., Hutchings, P. B., Jensen, D. H., Karabati, S., Kelmendi, K., Kengyel, G., Khachatryan, N., Ghazzawi, R., Kinahan, M., Kirby, T. A., Kovacs, M., Kozlowski, D., Krivoshchekov, V., Kryś, K., Kulich, C., Kurosawa, T., Lac An, N. T., Labarthe-Carrara, J., Lauri, M. A., Latu, I., Lawal, A. M., Li, J., Lindner, J., Lindqvist, A., Maitner, A. T., Makarova, E., Makashvili, A., Malayeri, S., Malik, S., Mancini, T., Manzi, C., Mari, S., Martiny, S. E., Mayer, C. H., Mihić, V., MiloševićĐorđević, J., Moreno-Bella, E., Moscatelli, S., Moynihan, A. B., Muller, D., Narhetali, E., Neto, F., Noels, K. A., Nyúl, B., O’Connor, E. C., Ochoa, D. P., Ohno, S., Olanrewaju Adebayo, S., Osborne, R., Pacilli, M. G., Palacio, J., Patnaik, S., Pavlopoulos, V., de León, P. P., Piterová, I., Porto, J. B., Puzio, A., Pyrkosz-Pacyna, J., Rentería Pérez, E., Renström, E., Rousseaux, T., Ryan, M. K., Safdar, S., Sainz, M., Salvati, M., Samekin, A., Schindler, S., Sevincer, A. T., Seydi, M., Shepherd, D., Sherbaji, S., Schmader, T., Simão, C., Sobhie, R., Sobiecki, J., De Souza, L., Sarter, E., Sulejmanović, D., Sullivan, K. E., Tatsumi, M., Tavitian-Elmadjian, L., Thakur, S. J., Thi Mong Chi, Q., Torre, B., Torres, A., Torres, C. V., Türkoğlu, B., Ungaretti, J., Valshtein, T., Van Laar, C., van der Noll, J., Vasiutynskyi, V., Vauclair, C. M., Vohra, N., Walentynowicz, M., Ward, C., Włodarczyk, A., Yang, Y., Yzerbyt, V., Zanello, V., Zapata-Calvente, A. L., Zawisza, M., Žukauskienė, R. & Żadkowska, M., 09.2023, In: Social Psychological and Personality Science. 14, 7, p. 808-824 17 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Global Consciousness Predicts Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence From 35 Cultures

Chen, S. X., Ng, J. C. K., Hui, B. P. H., Au, A. K. Y., Lam, B. C. P., Wu, W. C. H., Pun, N., Beattie, P., Welzel, C. & Liu, J. H., 01.06.2023, In: Social Psychological and Personality Science. 14, 5, p. 662-671 10 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

A Multilab Replication of the Ego Depletion Effect

Dang, J., Barker, P., Baumert, A., Bentvelzen, M., Berkman, E., Buchholz, N., Buczny, J., Chen, Z., De Cristofaro, V., de Vries, L., Dewitte, S., Giacomantonio, M., Gong, R., Homan, M., Imhoff, R., Ismail, I., Jia, L., Kubiak, T., Lange, F., Li, D. Y., Livingston, J., Ludwig, R., Panno, A., Pearman, J., Rassi, N., Schiöth, H. B., Schmitt, M., Sevincer, A. T., Shi, J., Stamos, A., Tan, Y. C., Wenzel, M., Zerhouni, O., Zhang, L. W., Zhang, Y. J. & Zinkernagel, A., 01.2021, In: Social Psychological and Personality Science. 12, 1, p. 14-24 11 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Professional Judges’ Disbelief in Free Will Does Not Decrease Punishment

Genschow, O., Hawickhorst, H., Rigoni, D., Aschermann, E. & Brass, M., 01.04.2021, In: Social Psychological and Personality Science. 12, 3, p. 357-362 6 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

“Terrorist” or “Mentally Ill”: Motivated Biases Rooted in Partisanship Shape Attributions About Violent Actors

Noor, M., Kteily, N., Siem, B. & Mazziotta, A., 01.05.2019, In: Social Psychological and Personality Science. 10, 4, p. 485-493 9 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Other publications by the same author(s)

Automatic Imitation

Genschow, O. (Editor) & Cracco, E. (Editor), 2025, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 355 p.

Research output: Books and anthologies › Collected editions and anthologies › Research

Introduction to Automatic Imitation

Genschow, O. & Cracco, E., 2025, Automatic Imitation. Genschow, O. & Cracco, E. (eds.). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, p. 1-7 7 p.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review

Perceptions of science, science communication, and climate change attitudes in 68 countries - the TISP dataset

Author Collaboration for "Perceptions of science, science communication, and climate change attitudes in 68 countries - the TISP dataset", Mede, N. G., Cologna, V., Berger, S., Besley, J., Genschow, O. & Westfal, M., 20.01.2025, In: Scientific data. 12, 1, 27 p., 114.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Social Modulation of Imitative Behavior

Genschow, O. & Cracco, E., 2025, Automatic Imitation. Genschow, O. & Cracco, E. (eds.). Springer Nature Switzerland AG, p. 219–239 21 p.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review

Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries

Author Collaboration of " Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries", Cologna, V., Mede, N. G., Berger, S., Besley, J., Brick, C., Genschow, O. & Westfal, M., 04.2025, In: Nature Human Behaviour. 9, 4, p. 713-730 18 p., e2108576118.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Indigenous and local knowledge in biocultural approaches to sustainability:
  2. A call for statistical editors in ecology
  3. Запрос населения на государственную поддержку и оценки последствий деятельности социального государства в России и Европе
  4. Collaborative Filmmaking
  5. The Problem of Institutional Fit
  6. Variational Pragmatics
  7. Two high-mountain burnet moth species (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae) react differently to the global change drivers climate and land-use
  8. How real options and ecological resilience thinking can assist in environmental risk management
  9. Reliability and validity of the self-report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in primary school children
  10. The influence of a consequence on the readiness potential preceding a self-initiated motor act
  11. Seth Price. Decimating Digital Data
  12. The influence of group membership on cross-contextual imitation
  13. Editorial zum Themenschwerpunkt
  14. Warm, lively, rough?
  15. Heat and light
  16. Asking elaborate questions: Focus groups and the management of spontaneity
  17. Technological governance - technological citizenship?
  18. The Concept Benign by Design
  19. Gender perspectives in resilience, vulnerability and adaptation to global environmental change
  20. To the unknown reader: Constructing absent readership in the eighteenth-century novel: Fielding, Sterne and Richardson
  21. Evidence-Based Entrepreneurship
  22. Numerical dynamic simulation and analysis of a lithium bromide/water long term solar heat storage system
  23. Sozialfaschismusthese
  24. Influences of SiC Particle Additions on the Grain Refinement of Mg–Zn Alloys
  25. On the Differential and Shared Effects of Leadership for Learning on Teachers’ Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction

Press / Media

  1. Zeit der Gewinner