1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publications
  5. Belief in Free Will Is Related to Intern...
  6. Output formats
  7. //

Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Standard

Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception. / Genschow, Oliver; Lange, Jens.

In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 13, No. 8, 01.11.2022, p. 1259-1268.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Genschow, O & Lange, J 2022, 'Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception', Social Psychological and Personality Science, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1259-1268. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211057711

APA

Genschow, O., & Lange, J. (2022). Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(8), 1259-1268. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211057711

Vancouver

Genschow O, Lange J. Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2022 Nov 1;13(8):1259-1268. doi: 10.1177/19485506211057711

Bibtex

@article{1ab85632f41d4ab4915bac306484ed58,
title = "Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception",
abstract = "Past research indicates that individuals{\textquoteright} belief in free will is related to attributing others{\textquoteright} behavior to internal causes. An open question is whether belief in free will is related to the attribution of one{\textquoteright}s own action. To answer this question, we tested two opposing predictions against each other by assessing the relation of belief in free will with the self-serving bias—individuals{\textquoteright} tendency to attribute personal success more strongly to internal forces and failure to external forces. The resource hypothesis predicts that a higher endorsement in free will belief relates to a lower self-serving bias. The intention attribution hypothesis predicts that belief in free will relates to higher internal attributions, as compared with external attributions, irrespective of success and failure. Meta-analytic evidence across five high-powered studies (total N = 1,137) supports the intention attribution hypothesis, but not the resource hypothesis (materials and data are available on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/2a89c/).",
keywords = "free will belief, intention attribution, self-regulation, self-serving bias, Business psychology",
author = "Oliver Genschow and Jens Lange",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2022.",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/19485506211057711",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1259--1268",
journal = "Social Psychological and Personality Science",
issn = "1948-5506",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Belief in Free Will Is Related to Internal Attribution in Self-Perception

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Lange, Jens

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2022.

PY - 2022/11/1

Y1 - 2022/11/1

N2 - Past research indicates that individuals’ belief in free will is related to attributing others’ behavior to internal causes. An open question is whether belief in free will is related to the attribution of one’s own action. To answer this question, we tested two opposing predictions against each other by assessing the relation of belief in free will with the self-serving bias—individuals’ tendency to attribute personal success more strongly to internal forces and failure to external forces. The resource hypothesis predicts that a higher endorsement in free will belief relates to a lower self-serving bias. The intention attribution hypothesis predicts that belief in free will relates to higher internal attributions, as compared with external attributions, irrespective of success and failure. Meta-analytic evidence across five high-powered studies (total N = 1,137) supports the intention attribution hypothesis, but not the resource hypothesis (materials and data are available on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/2a89c/).

AB - Past research indicates that individuals’ belief in free will is related to attributing others’ behavior to internal causes. An open question is whether belief in free will is related to the attribution of one’s own action. To answer this question, we tested two opposing predictions against each other by assessing the relation of belief in free will with the self-serving bias—individuals’ tendency to attribute personal success more strongly to internal forces and failure to external forces. The resource hypothesis predicts that a higher endorsement in free will belief relates to a lower self-serving bias. The intention attribution hypothesis predicts that belief in free will relates to higher internal attributions, as compared with external attributions, irrespective of success and failure. Meta-analytic evidence across five high-powered studies (total N = 1,137) supports the intention attribution hypothesis, but not the resource hypothesis (materials and data are available on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/2a89c/).

KW - free will belief

KW - intention attribution

KW - self-regulation

KW - self-serving bias

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123941583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/63be21c8-3009-3944-bcae-0bbe3d340b87/

U2 - 10.1177/19485506211057711

DO - 10.1177/19485506211057711

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85123941583

VL - 13

SP - 1259

EP - 1268

JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science

JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science

SN - 1948-5506

IS - 8

ER -

Related by journal

Gendered Self-Views Across 62 Countries: A Test of Competing Models

Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Bosson, J. K., Jurek, P., Besta, T., Olech, M., Vandello, J. A., Bender, M., Dandy, J., Hoorens, V., Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Mankowski, E., Venäläinen, S., Abuhamdeh, S., Agyemang, C. B., Akbaş, G., Albayrak-Aydemir, N., Ammirati, S., Anderson, J., Anjum, G., Ariyanto, A., Aruta, J. J. B. R., Ashraf, M., Bakaitytė, A., Becker, M., Bertolli, C., Bërxulli, D., Best, D. L., Bi, C., Block, K., Boehnke, M., Bongiorno, R., Bosak, J., Casini, A., Chen, Q., Chi, P., Cubela Adoric, V., Daalmans, S., de Lemus, S., Dhakal, S., Dvorianchikov, N., Egami, S., Etchezahar, E., Esteves, C. S., Froehlich, L., Garcia-Sanchez, E., Gavreliuc, A., Gavreliuc, D., Gomez, Á., Guizzo, F., Graf, S., Greijdanus, H., Grigoryan, A., Grzymała-Moszczyńska, J., Guerch, K., Gustafsson Sendén, M., Hale, M. L., Hämer, H., Hirai, M., Hoang Duc, L., Hřebíčková, M., Hutchings, P. B., Jensen, D. H., Karabati, S., Kelmendi, K., Kengyel, G., Khachatryan, N., Ghazzawi, R., Kinahan, M., Kirby, T. A., Kovacs, M., Kozlowski, D., Krivoshchekov, V., Kryś, K., Kulich, C., Kurosawa, T., Lac An, N. T., Labarthe-Carrara, J., Lauri, M. A., Latu, I., Lawal, A. M., Li, J., Lindner, J., Lindqvist, A., Maitner, A. T., Makarova, E., Makashvili, A., Malayeri, S., Malik, S., Mancini, T., Manzi, C., Mari, S., Martiny, S. E., Mayer, C. H., Mihić, V., MiloševićĐorđević, J., Moreno-Bella, E., Moscatelli, S., Moynihan, A. B., Muller, D., Narhetali, E., Neto, F., Noels, K. A., Nyúl, B., O’Connor, E. C., Ochoa, D. P., Ohno, S., Olanrewaju Adebayo, S., Osborne, R., Pacilli, M. G., Palacio, J., Patnaik, S., Pavlopoulos, V., de León, P. P., Piterová, I., Porto, J. B., Puzio, A., Pyrkosz-Pacyna, J., Rentería Pérez, E., Renström, E., Rousseaux, T., Ryan, M. K., Safdar, S., Sainz, M., Salvati, M., Samekin, A., Schindler, S., Sevincer, A. T., Seydi, M., Shepherd, D., Sherbaji, S., Schmader, T., Simão, C., Sobhie, R., Sobiecki, J., De Souza, L., Sarter, E., Sulejmanović, D., Sullivan, K. E., Tatsumi, M., Tavitian-Elmadjian, L., Thakur, S. J., Thi Mong Chi, Q., Torre, B., Torres, A., Torres, C. V., Türkoğlu, B., Ungaretti, J., Valshtein, T., Van Laar, C., van der Noll, J., Vasiutynskyi, V., Vauclair, C. M., Vohra, N., Walentynowicz, M., Ward, C., Włodarczyk, A., Yang, Y., Yzerbyt, V., Zanello, V., Zapata-Calvente, A. L., Zawisza, M., Žukauskienė, R. & Żadkowska, M., 2022, (Accepted/In press) In: Social Psychological and Personality Science.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Global Consciousness Predicts Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence From 35 Cultures

Chen, S. X., Ng, J. C. K., Hui, B. P. H., Au, A. K. Y., Lam, B. C. P., Wu, W. C. H., Pun, N., Beattie, P., Welzel, C. & Liu, J. H., 2022, (Accepted/In press) In: Social Psychological and Personality Science.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

A Multilab Replication of the Ego Depletion Effect

Dang, J., Barker, P., Baumert, A., Bentvelzen, M., Berkman, E., Buchholz, N., Buczny, J., Chen, Z., De Cristofaro, V., de Vries, L., Dewitte, S., Giacomantonio, M., Gong, R., Homan, M., Imhoff, R., Ismail, I., Jia, L., Kubiak, T., Lange, F., Li, D. Y., Livingston, J., Ludwig, R., Panno, A., Pearman, J., Rassi, N., Schiöth, H. B., Schmitt, M., Sevincer, A. T., Shi, J., Stamos, A., Tan, Y. C., Wenzel, M., Zerhouni, O., Zhang, L. W., Zhang, Y. J. & Zinkernagel, A., 01.2021, In: Social Psychological and Personality Science. 12, 1, p. 14-24 11 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Professional Judges’ Disbelief in Free Will Does Not Decrease Punishment

Genschow, O., Hawickhorst, H., Rigoni, D., Aschermann, E. & Brass, M., 01.04.2021, In: Social Psychological and Personality Science. 12, 3, p. 357-362 6 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

“Terrorist” or “Mentally Ill”: Motivated Biases Rooted in Partisanship Shape Attributions About Violent Actors

Noor, M., Kteily, N., Siem, B. & Mazziotta, A., 01.05.2019, In: Social Psychological and Personality Science. 10, 4, p. 485-493 9 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Other publications by the same author(s)

Do unbiased people act more rationally? - The case of comparative realism and vaccine intention

Izydorczak, K., Dolinski, D., Genschow, O., Kulesza, W., Muniak, P., Casara, B. G. S. & Suitner, C., 01.02.2023, In: Royal Society Open Science. 10, 2, 19 p., 220775.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

It Is Belief in Dualism, and Not Free Will, That Best Predicts Helping: A Conceptual Replication and Extension of Baumeister et al. (2009)

Genschow, O., 2023, (Accepted/In press) In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

It Matters to Whom You Compare Yourself: The Case of Unrealistic Optimism and Gender-Specific Comparisons

Kulesza, W., Dolinski, D., Suitner, C., Genschow, O., Muniak, P., Izydorczak, K. & Salvador Casara, B. G., 31.01.2023, (E-pub ahead of print) In: American Journal of Men's Health. 17, 1, 13 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Relativity in Social Cognition: Basic processes and novel applications of social comparisons

Unkelbach, C., Alves, H., Baldwin, M., Crusius, J., Diel, K., Galinsky, A. D., Gast, A., Hofmann, W., Imhoff, R., Genschow, O., Lammers, J., Pauels, E., Schneider, I., Topolinski, S., Westfal, M. & Mussweiler, T., 10.01.2023, (E-pub ahead of print) In: European Review of Social Psychology. 54 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Automatic or controlled: How does disbelief in free will influence cognitive functioning?

Katzir, M. & Genschow, O., 01.11.2022, In: British Journal of Psychology. 113, 4, p. 1121-1142 22 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

DOI