Beeinflussen Regierungen die parlamentarische Tagesordnung? Agendakontrolle und Zeitverteilung im britischen Unterhaus und im Deutschen Bundestag
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
Beeinflussen Regierungen die parlamentarische Tagesordnung? Agendakontrolle und Zeitverteilung im britischen Unterhaus und im Deutschen Bundestag. / Koß, Michael; Tan, Miryam.
In: Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2019, p. 368-384.Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Beeinflussen Regierungen die parlamentarische Tagesordnung? Agendakontrolle und Zeitverteilung im britischen Unterhaus und im Deutschen Bundestag
AU - Koß, Michael
AU - Tan, Miryam
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Do governments use their control of the parliamentary agenda to influence the allocation of plenary time and devote relatively less time to important legislation? Using an original dataset comprising all plenary debates during two parliamentary sessions each in the British House of Commons and the German Bundestag in which all (legislative and non-legislative) debates on matters of national importance are identified, one can find no support for this claim . Both in absolute and relative terms, more legislative time is allocated to important legislation under centralized agenda control in the House of Commons . If one additionally considers non-legislative debates, the relative shares of plenary time devoted to important topics is similar . However, in absolute terms, more than twice as much time is allocated to important topics in the House of Commons than in the Bundestag .
AB - Do governments use their control of the parliamentary agenda to influence the allocation of plenary time and devote relatively less time to important legislation? Using an original dataset comprising all plenary debates during two parliamentary sessions each in the British House of Commons and the German Bundestag in which all (legislative and non-legislative) debates on matters of national importance are identified, one can find no support for this claim . Both in absolute and relative terms, more legislative time is allocated to important legislation under centralized agenda control in the House of Commons . If one additionally considers non-legislative debates, the relative shares of plenary time devoted to important topics is similar . However, in absolute terms, more than twice as much time is allocated to important topics in the House of Commons than in the Bundestag .
KW - Politikwissenschaft
U2 - 10.5771/0340-1758-2019-2-368
DO - 10.5771/0340-1758-2019-2-368
M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze
VL - 50
SP - 368
EP - 384
JO - Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen
JF - Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen
SN - 0340-1758
IS - 2
ER -