Balancing ecological and social goals in PES design – Single objective strategies are not sufficient

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Felipe Benra
  • L. Nahuelhual
  • María R. Felipe-Lucia
  • A. Jaramillo
  • C. Jullian
  • Aletta Bonn
Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) are key instruments to foster environmental conservation and, arguably, social development goals. PES are, however, commonly designed based on a single environmental objective (e.g., conservation of native forest areas), and expected to simultaneously fulfil social goals which are rarely evaluated. Thus, to meet social goals, PES design needs to transcend single environmental objectives. Here, we evaluate the performance of three PES strategies composed of different targeting criteria. The strategies were (1) conserving native forest cover, (2) production of a specific ecosystem service (ES) based on a single ecological objective and (3) production of a specific ES based on multiple social and ecological objectives. We illustrate the performance of the three PES strategies for a forest dominated rural area in southern Chile using a Surface Measure Overall Performance (SMOP) analysis. We evaluate the outcomes of the three strategies based on ten ecological and social criteria, namely ecosystem service supply productivity, threats to ES supply, farm property size, social vulnerability, indigenous status of land tenure, landscape connectivity, proportion of native forest cover, number of targeted properties, number of small-sized targeted properties, and proportion of ES supply. Strategies based on a single objective (1 and 2) resulted in higher scores for the criteria landscape connectivity and ES productivity, while failing to improve social goals by targeting mainly large non-indigenous properties. In contrast, the multiple-objective strategy (3) achieved a better balance between ecological and social criteria and targeted mainly small-sized properties belonging to indigenous landowners. Our results show that selecting sound PES objectives is key to achieving a balance between social and ecological goals in forest-dominated rural landscapes threatened by land use change. Relying on commonly employed single objective PES strategies is not sufficient to foster sustainable development.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101385
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume53
Number of pages15
ISSN2212-0416
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.02.2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. The Myth of Deconsolidation
  2. Erratum zu
  3. Bird community responses to the edge between suburbs and reserves
  4. Temperature-dependent mechanical behavior of aluminum AM structures generated via multi-layer friction surfacing
  5. Die Rechtschreibung beim Textschreiben
  6. The balanced scorecard’s missing link to compensation
  7. Radverkehrsförderung 3.0
  8. Systematic literature review of flipping classroom in mathematics
  9. Habitat specialization, distribution range size and body size drive extinction risk in carabid beetles
  10. Introducing ‘cultures of rejection’
  11. Calibration of the Chemcatcher ® passive sampler for monitoring selected polar and semi-polar pesticides in surface water
  12. PragmatiKK: Target Group-specific Approach in a web-based Stress Prevention Platform for Micro and Small Companies
  13. Towards a decision support system for radiotherapy business continuity in a pandemic crisis
  14. Challenges and solutions to establishing and sustaining citizen science projects in South Africa
  15. Toward a Framework for University-Based Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Human Capital Development in Sub-Saharan Africa
  16. A new approach to semantic sustainability assessment
  17. The Anonymous Powers of the Habitus
  18. Leading digital innovation in schools
  19. Akteure, Berater und Beobachter, oder: wie kommt Strategie in die Politik?
  20. Angels of Efficiency
  21. Best-Practice-Beispiel: Wie kann Mentoring in die neue Studienorganisation implementiert werden?
  22. From negative to positive sustainability performance measurement and assessment? A qualitative inquiry drawing on framing effects theory
  23. Climate and animal distribution
  24. Attention and Information Acquisition
  25. Moral sensitivity in business
  26. Embracing conflicts for interpersonal competence development in project-based sustainability courses
  27. Defining Value in Sustainable Business Models
  28. Foraging wireworms are attracted to root-produced volatile aldehydes
  29. From grief to hope in conservation
  30. Kunstdidaktik
  31. The emergence of local open government
  32. Language, Literature and the Environment
  33. Accounting for Information Infrastructure as Medium for Organisational Change
  34. An empirical survey on biobanking of human genetic material and data in six EU countries
  35. Sintflut
  36. Image Match
  37. Theodor Fontane, das Fremde und die Juden
  38. Constitutive views on csr communication
  39. Readings in applied organizational behavior from the Lüneburg Symposium
  40. What Do They Reflect on?—A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Physical Education Preservice Teachers’ Written Reflections After a Long-Term Internship