Audit pricing in China and Pakistan: A comparative review of audit practices
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Accounting and Management Information Systems, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2014, p. 98-110 .
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Audit pricing in China and Pakistan
T2 - A comparative review of audit practices
AU - Younas, Zahid Irshad
AU - Velte, Patrick
AU - Ashfaq, K.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - The purpose of this study is to investigate the firm level factors effecton the audit pricing in China and Pakistan. For this purpose, we used the panel data of 160 firms of each country of study for the period from 2005 to 2011. First, we run the combined model for two countries and observed that complexity of business transaction is the only variable contributing positively and significantly in audit pricing of both countries. Then, for comparative review, we segregated the data of each country and run separate model. The results of separate models show that, in the case of Pakistan auditors mainly consider complexity of business transactions and client risk while pricing their engagement as an auditor.However, in the case of China the auditors only consider the Big 4 audit firm effect as a reputational tool while pricing their audit activity. The auditors in China totally ignore the client risk and complexity of business transactions which may be problematic for their auditing firm in future. The study concludes that audit pricing in Pakistan is more rational in comparison to China.
AB - The purpose of this study is to investigate the firm level factors effecton the audit pricing in China and Pakistan. For this purpose, we used the panel data of 160 firms of each country of study for the period from 2005 to 2011. First, we run the combined model for two countries and observed that complexity of business transaction is the only variable contributing positively and significantly in audit pricing of both countries. Then, for comparative review, we segregated the data of each country and run separate model. The results of separate models show that, in the case of Pakistan auditors mainly consider complexity of business transactions and client risk while pricing their engagement as an auditor.However, in the case of China the auditors only consider the Big 4 audit firm effect as a reputational tool while pricing their audit activity. The auditors in China totally ignore the client risk and complexity of business transactions which may be problematic for their auditing firm in future. The study concludes that audit pricing in Pakistan is more rational in comparison to China.
KW - Management studies
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 13
SP - 98
EP - 110
JO - Accounting and Management Information Systems
JF - Accounting and Management Information Systems
SN - 1843-8105
IS - 1
ER -