Assessing empirical research on value-based management: Guidelines for improved hypothesis testing
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 60, No. 1, 03.2010, p. 1-47.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing empirical research on value-based management
T2 - Guidelines for improved hypothesis testing
AU - Lueg, Rainer
AU - Schäffer, Utz
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - The claims that value-based management (VBM) increases corporate performance have attracted considerable interest among researchers and organizations over the last three decades. Even though many studies have been conducted, the evidence on whether users outperform non-users is inconsistent. This paper attempts to place these diverse findings into perspective, and provide venues for future research. For that purpose, we drafted a framework to analyze 120 empirical studies on VBM. We concluded that meaningful hypothesis tests have been impaired by the narrow scope of data sets as well as methodological misspecifications. Based on this analysis, we categorized studies into four streams of research, employing factor analysis and cluster analysis. We then suggested that the most sophisticated studies identified positive performance effects of VBM. Lastly, we derived guidelines to improve the hypothesis testing of future studies on VBM.
AB - The claims that value-based management (VBM) increases corporate performance have attracted considerable interest among researchers and organizations over the last three decades. Even though many studies have been conducted, the evidence on whether users outperform non-users is inconsistent. This paper attempts to place these diverse findings into perspective, and provide venues for future research. For that purpose, we drafted a framework to analyze 120 empirical studies on VBM. We concluded that meaningful hypothesis tests have been impaired by the narrow scope of data sets as well as methodological misspecifications. Based on this analysis, we categorized studies into four streams of research, employing factor analysis and cluster analysis. We then suggested that the most sophisticated studies identified positive performance effects of VBM. Lastly, we derived guidelines to improve the hypothesis testing of future studies on VBM.
KW - Literature review
KW - Shareholder value
KW - Strategic performance measurement
KW - Value-based management
KW - Value-driver
KW - Management studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73149103910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11301-009-0055-9
DO - 10.1007/s11301-009-0055-9
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:73149103910
VL - 60
SP - 1
EP - 47
JO - Journal für Betriebswirtschaft
JF - Journal für Betriebswirtschaft
SN - 2198-1620
IS - 1
ER -